The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using zoom software

1

Wound Healing Assay with Nanomedicine Treatments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeyA8-MDR/HeyA8, SKOV3-TR/SKOV3-TR (3 × 103) cells were seeded in a 96-well plate. Scratches were generated using a 96-pin wound maker (Essen BioScience, Ann Arbor, MI) and cells were treated with free tariquidar (XR), paclitaxel (PCT), LP(XR), LP(PCT), or LP(XR,PCT) (50 nM, PCT; 40 nM, XR) or not treated. The cells were imaged in real-time every 2 hrs using an IncuCyte® system (Essen BioScience) with phase-contrast microscopy at a 10X magnification (42 (link), 43 (link)). Changes in confluence of the wound/scratch were quantified by Zoom software (Essen BioScience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cytokine Secretion Analysis of CAR-T Cell-Mediated Tumor Killing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5×104 GFP or RFP-labeled tumor cells were cocultured with 5×104 GFP CAR-T cells in 200μL RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS, 10mM HEPES, 2mM L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100μg/mL streptomycin. Triplicate wells were plated in 96-well flat-bottom plates for each condition. Tumor fluorescence was monitored every 2–3 hours with a 10x objective using the Incucyte Zoom system (Essen Bioscience), housed in a cell culture incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2, set to take 4 images per well at each time point. Total integrated GFP or RFP intensity was quantified using the Zoom software (Essen Bioscience). Data were normalized to the first timepoint and plotted as fold change in tumor fluorescence over time. For cytokine secretion analysis, cocultures were setup as above except in 96-well round bottom plates. After approximately 24 hours, plates were spun down to pellet cells and 100uL of supernatant was harvested and stored at −80°C until analysis. IFNγ and IL-2 levels in coculture supernatants were quantified by ELISA (Human ELISA MAX Deluxe, Biolegend) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Negative cytokine values were set to 0. Coculture experiments were setup using day 10 T cells, with the exception of On/Off kinetics experiments in Fig. 1G and S1F, which were setup on Day 14.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying HUVEC Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HUVECs were seeded at a density of 50,000 cells/well into a 96-well ImageLockTM tissue culture plate (Essen BioScience) and incubated in MV2 medium overnight followed by standardized scratching using WoundMakerTM (Essen BioScience). Cells were washed with PBS, and the plate was placed into an IncuCyte ZOOM (Essen BioScience) and scanned every 15 min for 12 h using a 10× objective, during which data were collected using ZOOM software (Essen BioScience). Cellular migration was analyzed using MTrackJ in ImageJ by manually marking the cells at each time frame. The migration speed of one cell was obtained by dividing the migration distance by time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The complement-dependent cytotoxicity assay (CDC) was performed with IgG purified from pre-immunized (day 1) and post-immunized (day 126) sera of cynomolgus monkeys using Zeba™ Spin Desalting Columns (Thermo Scientific) and the Melon Gel IgG Purification Kit (Thermo Scientific). CDC activity was evaluated in Jurkat-GFP cells and MCF-7, SHIN3 and OVCAR cells labeled with 5 μM of CFSE (carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester, Life Technologies). Cells (6000/well) were incubated with cynomolgus antibodies at various concentrations and DRAQ7 viability dye (Abcam) at 2 μM, in the presence or absence of 1 % of rabbit complement-MA (Cedarlane) for 2 h in 384-well plates (37 °C). Green fluorescence (live cells) and red (dead cells) fluorescence were measured on an Incucyte™ ZOOM instrument (Essen Bioscience), and the number of cells was calculated using ZOOM software (Essen Bioscience). All measurements were performed in duplicate. The percentage of CDC was determined as follows: % of CDC = ((% of dead cells)complement – (% of dead cells)medium) normalized against the control without antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mouse Lung Endothelial Cell Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse lung iECs were seeded at the density of 50,000 cells/well into a 96‐well ImageLock™ tissue culture plate (Essen BioScience) and incubated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) GlutaMAX™ growth media (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FCS, 50 μg/ml heparin, 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma), and 1% non‐essential amino acids (Gibco) overnight followed by standardized scratching using WoundMaker™ (Essen BioScience). Cells were washed with PBS and stimulated with 50 ng/ml mouse VEGFA (PeproTech) in DMEM GlutaMAX™ with 0.5% FCS. The plate was placed into an IncuCyte ZOOM (Essen BioScience) and scanned every 15 min for 12 h using a 10× objective during which data were collected using ZOOM software (Essen BioScience). Cellular migration was analyzed using MTrackJ in ImageJ (NIH). Single cell tracks were selected manually, and data were collected for quantitative analysis of migration speed. Migration speed of one cell was obtained by dividing the migration distance (measured by the software) by time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microscopic Imaging of Cell Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phase contrast images were taken on an Eclipse TS100 inverted microscope (Nikon) using QCapture Pro software version 5.1.1.14 (QImaging). UV fluorescence was used to take GFP pictures of cells. The IncuCyte microscope (Essen Biosciences) was used to take phase contrast and GFP fluorescent images and ZOOM software (Essen Biosciences) was used to extract and export the images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!