The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using itraconazole itz

1

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolates detected as resistant by the screening method were further tested for antifungal susceptibility using the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) microdilution broth reference method [30 ]. All clinically available azole antifungal molecules were tested: itraconazole (ITZ) (Sigma-Aldrich); voriconazole (VCZ) (Sigma-Aldrich); posaconazole (PCZ) (MSD, Kenilworth, NJ, USA); and isavuconazole (ISA) (Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd., Basel, Switzerland). The number of conidia inoculated was 105 to 2.5 × 105 cfu/mL and the concentrations of each drug ranged from 0.016 to 8 mg/L. After 48 h of incubation at 37 °C, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined, both visually, as the lowest drug concentration that could completely inhibit fungal growth, and spectrophotometrically at 550 nm using a 90% growth inhibition endpoint. All tests were performed in triplicate. Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and Candida krusei ATCC 6258 were included as quality controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Itraconazole Nanosuspension Formulation and Optimization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Itraconazole (ITZ) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Supplier: Wuhan Atomole Chemicals Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) and jet-milled prior to use. Hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC-SL; Nippon Soda Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), polysorbate 80 (PS80; Kolb Distribution AG, Hedingen, Switzerland) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; BTC Europe GmbH, Monheim am Rhein, Germany) were used as stabilizers for the nanosuspensions. Milling beads (zirconium oxide, yttrium stabilized, density 6 g/mL, diameter 0.3–0.4 mm (except for investigation of the effect of bead size, see Section 3.2.3)) were purchased from VMA Getzmann GmbH (Reichshof, Germany). For milling trials, 10 mL polypropylene (PP) vials from iphas (iphas Pharma-Verpackung GmbH, Würselen, Germany) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antifungal and Triterpene Stock Solutions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Itraconazole (ITZ), Ketoconazole (KET), and Fluconazole (FLC) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA). Stock solutions were prepared at a final concentration of 500 μg mL−1 in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) 5% v/v. A stock solution of β-escin, 95% purity (Phytolab Vestenbergsgreuth, Germany), was prepared at a final concentration of 200 μg mL−1 in DMSO 5% v/v.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CLSI broth microdilution (CLSI-BMD) method of M27-A3/S4 was used for antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, M27-A3, 2008; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, M27-S4, 2012). AFST included the following antifungal drugs, amphotericin B (AMB), fluconazole (FLZ), voriconazole (VRZ), itraconazole (ITZ) all from (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A), micafungin (MFG) (Astellas, Munich, Germany) and anidulafungin (ANF) (Pfizer, NY, USA). Reference strains of C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) and C. krusei (ATCC 6258) were used for quality control purposes. Due to interlaboratory variation, caspofungin was not used in this study (Espinel-Ingroff et al., 2013 (link)). Plates containing antifungal drugs and isolates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h and data were recorded visually. MIC data were interpreted based on CLSI M60 (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, M60, 2017). Isolates showing a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥8 μg/ml were noted as resistant to FLZ, MFG, and ANF, while those with VRZ MIC ≥1 μg/ml were regarded resistant (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, M60, 2017). AMB and ITZ MIC values were interpreted as epidemiological cut-off values (ECV), where non-wild-types (NWT) isolates had a MIC >2 and >0.5 μg/ml, respectively (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, M60, 2017).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Itraconazole Formulation Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Itraconazole (ITZ) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Phospholipid 90 H was kindly donated by Lipoid GmbH (Ludwigshafen, Germany). Sodium deoxycholate (SDC) and sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) were purchased from Loba Chemie (Mumbai, India). Hydroxyl propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) was purchased from Alpha Chemica (Mumbai, India). All other chemicals were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

In vitro Antifungal Compound Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the in vitro assays, voriconazole (VCZ, Sigma-Aldrich), itraconazole (ITZ, Sigma-Aldrich), amphotericin B (AMB, Sigma-Aldrich), terbinafine (TRB, Sigma-Aldrich), and brilacidin (BRI, supplied by Innovation Pharmaceuticals) were diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMOS); while miltefosine (MFS, Sigma-Aldrich), the milteforan active compound, was diluted in ethanol; and caspofungin (CSP, Sigma-Aldrich) was diluted in distilled water. milteforan (miltefosine 2%) was purchased from Virbac as an oral solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the MIC values of each species, the broth microdilution method using CLSI-M27/A3 was followed [19 ]. AFST included the following antifungals; fluconazole (FLZ) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), voriconazole (VRZ) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), itraconazole (ITZ) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) anidulafungin (AND) (Pfizer, NY, USA), micafungin (MFG) (Astellas, Munich, Germany), and amphotericin B (AMB) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). MIC values were visually read after 24 h of incubation at 35 °C, and Pichia kudriavzveii (ATCC 6258) and C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) were used for quality control purposes. MIC data were interpreted in a species-specific manner as suggested [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!