The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rat anti mouse f4 80 monoclonal antibody

Manufactured by Abcam
Sourced in United Kingdom

Rat anti-mouse F4/80 monoclonal antibody is a laboratory reagent used for the detection and identification of the F4/80 antigen in mouse samples. The antibody recognizes the F4/80 antigen, which is expressed on the surface of mouse macrophages. This antibody can be used in various immunological techniques, such as flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and Western blotting, to study the distribution and function of macrophages in mouse models.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using rat anti mouse f4 80 monoclonal antibody

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Muscle Biopsy in DMD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The muscle biopsy specimens from DMD patients and non-DMD controls were freshly frozen in liquid nitrogen–cooled isopentane. The frozen muscle Sects. (8 μm) were stained with HE and pathological changes were observed under a light microscope. IHC assay was according to the previous manufacturer's suggestion [25 (link)]. Briefly, the dry slides were preblocked in PBS containing 10% normal goat serum and incubated overnight with the primary antibodies for macrophages (rat monoclonal anti-mouse F4/80 antibody, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), CD4 positive T cells (mouse monoclonal antibody against CD4, Maxim, Fuzhou, China) or CD8 positive T cells (mouse monoclonal antibody against CD8, Maxim, Fuzhou, China), respectively. Then, the cells were rinsed and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody (Proteintech, Wuhan, China) at 20 ℃ for 20 min. 3,3-diaminobenzedine tetrahydrocloride (Solarbio, Beijing, China) was used as chromogenic substrate. Lastly, the cells were counterstained with haematoxylin and mounted. The Ab binding was observed under a microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Immune Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections using following antibodies and dilution ratios: rat monoclonal anti-mouse F4/80 antibody (1:250, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), rabbit polyclonal anti-mouse CD3 antibody (1:500, Abcam), and rat monoclonal anti-mouse E-cadherin (1:200, eBioscience). Briefly, after dewaxing and rehydration, a heat-inducing antigen retrieval procedure using citrate buffer at pH 6.0 for 21 min was performed on all tissue sections, with subsequent washing in PBS and endogenous peroxidase blocking with EnVisionTM FLEX Peroxidase-Blocking Reagent (Dako, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for 10 min. Sections were incubated with primary antibodies overnight. Sections stained with anti-F4/80 and anti-E-cadherin antibody were incubated with secondary polyclonal rabbit anti-rat immunoglobulins/HRP (1:500, Dako) for 60 min. The CD3 sections were treated by applying the commercial EnVisionTM FLEX/HRP detection reagent (Dako). Immunoreactions were developed with diaminobenzidine (DAB, Dako) diluted in EnVisionTM FLEX Substarte Buffer (Dako). The sections were counterstained with haematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Thrombus Cellular Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
48 hours following IVC ligation, the formed thrombi were isolated and fixed in zinc formation. Cellular components of thrombi were determined using corresponding antibodies on paraffin-embedded sections. Macrophages were identified with a rat anti-mouse F4/80 monoclonal antibody (1:100) (Abcam, Cambridge, MA). Neutrophils were identified with a rabbit anti-mouse myeloperoxidase (MPO) polyclonal antibody (1:200) (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA). The NET-related markers cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide (CRAMP) and citrullinated histone H3 (Cit-H3) were detected using a rabbit anti-mouse CRAMP polyclonal antibody (1:200) (Innovagen, Lund, Sweden) and a rabbit anti-mouse Cit-H3 polyclonal antibody (1:100) (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) as described previously42 (link). Positive cells were detected with corresponding biotin-conjugated secondary antibodies. Stained cells were counted manually from five positively stained fields in each section using NIH ImageJ software and expressed as a percentage of positive cells per unit area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibody Sources and Reagents for Metabolic Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies were obtained from the following sources: mouse anti-human ASS1 monoclonal antibody from BD Pharmingen and Cell Signaling Technology, Inc; rabbit anti-human ASS1 polyclonal antibody from Aviva Systems Biology; rabbit anti-human ASL polyclonal antibody from Atlas (UK); rat anti-mouse F4/80 monoclonal antibody from Abcam; anti-mouse AlexaFluor 488 and anti-rabbit AlexaFluor 568 from Invitrogen. Argininosuccinic acid, arginine (1119-34-2), and citrulline (C7629) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, UK, and 13C6 arginine and D4 citrulline were from Cambridge Isotopes laboratory, MA, USA. LC–MS grade water, acetonitrile, and formic acid were obtained from Fisher Scientific, UK.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Macrophage Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 4-μm-thick slide-mounted sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated with graded ethanols. The slides were incubated in 1:50 dilution of rat anti-mouse F4/80 monoclonal antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) overnight at 4°C. Then, the slides were incubated with 1:200 diluted biotinylated goat anti-rat secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 30 min, and subsequently reacted with streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate and 3’, 3’-diaminobenzidine. The slides were examined under light microscope at a magnification of ×200 and macrophages positive for F4/80 were counted in 10 microscopic fields of the cortex. Results were expressed as the number of macrophages per high power field (HPF).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!