The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using ms 500 mass spectrometer

1

LC-MS Analysis of Polyphenol Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phenolic composition was investigated by LC/DAD-ESI-MS following the procedure described by Pinto et al. [13 (link)], using an Agilent 1260 liquid chromatography (LC) equipment attached to a diode array detector (DAD), a electrospray ion (ESI) source operating in negative ion mode and a Varian 500-MS mass spectrometer (MS). The column used was an Agilent Eclipse C18 3 × 100 mm (3.5 µm) and the elution was ternary. The mobile phases were water with 1% formic acid (A), acetonitrile (B), methanol (C), and water with 0.1% formic acid (D) applied in the following gradients: 0–12 min, 5% A, 5% B and 90% D; 12–18 min, 5% A, 15% B, 20% C and 60% D; 18–20 min, 5% A, 70% B, 20% C and 5% D; and then, 5% A, 5% B and 90% D. The flow rate and the injection volume were 400 µL/min and 10 µL, respectively. Turbo data-depending scanning (TDDS) was used to attain the fragmentation patterns of the eluted compounds. The ultraviolet (UV) spectrum was also confirmed for the compounds identified in comparison with the respective standards and literature. For quantification purposes, ellagic acid, protocatechuic acid, and pyrogallol were used as standards. The results are presented as µg of each phenolic compound per gram on DW.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Trisiloxane Structure Confirmation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The water solution of a mixture of organomodified trisiloxanes (Dergall) was used as a test material (Dergall, ICB Pharma, Jaworzno, Poland; Patent No. WO 2016/061259).
The formation of the aforementioned structure was confirmed by the determination of the amount of silicon from the siloxane chain to the silicon present in the trisiloxane structure by the use of a Varian 500-MS mass spectrometer in the following conditions: positive ionization, drying gas temperature 150°C, drying gas pressure 25 psi, capillary voltage 70 V, needle voltage 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of Polyphenol Classes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Separation of polyphenols was achieved on an Agilent Eclipse XDB C-18 (3.0 × 150 mm) 3.5 μm eluting with acetonitrile (A) and H2O 0.1% formic acid (B). A gradient program was used as follows: 0 → 15th min: A:B (5:95) → A:B (15:85) 15 → 35th min: A:B (85:15) → A:B (100:0) 48 → 53th min: A:B(100:0) → A:B (5:95). After the chromatography column a “T” junction split the flow to DAD and Varian MS 500 mass spectrometer with ESI as ion source. Flow rate was set at 500 µL/min. For qualitative purposes, MSn spectra was used for identification of the compound, with the use of reference when available. For quantification, DAD detector was set at 280, 330 and 350 nm. Compounds were identified on the basis of MS data and UV spectra and classified in four classes namely proanthocyanidins, dihydrochalcones, hydroxycinnamic acids and flavonols. For quantification of these classes of compounds the following reference compounds were used namely catechin, phloridzin, chlorogeinc acid and rutin. Standard solutions were prepared for the calibration curves in the concentration range of 5–100 µg/mL: catechin at 280 nm, y = 20.525x + 3.2962 (r2 = 0.999); phloridzin at 280 nm, y = 87.029x – 1.832 (r2 = 0.9998); chlorogenic acid at 330 nm, y = 47.359x + 439.99 (r2 = 0.9951); rutin at 350 nm, y = 27.788x + 330.7 (r2 = 0.9981).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Triterpene Separation and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Triterpenes were separated on an Agilent Eclipse XDB C-18 (3.0 × 150 mm) 3.5 μm using methanol (A) and H2O (B) as mobile phases. A gradient program was used as follows: 0 → 12th min: A:B (45:55) → A:B (80:20) 12 → 48th min: A:B (80:20) → A:B (80:20) 48 → 49th min: A:B (80:20) → A:B (45:55) 49 → 55th min: A:B (45:55) → A:B (45:55). Flow rate was 500 µL/min. After the chromatography column, a Varian MS 500 mass spectrometer was used using APCI as ion source. Identification of triterpene was done on the base of MSn spectra and NMR spectra of isolated compounds as reported in our previous work. [34 (link)]. For quantification purposes we adopted oleanolic acid as the reference standard and the calibration curve was obtained in the range 5–150 µg/mL, y = 18755x + 961.31 (r2 = 0.9992). Quantification was obtained using [M − H] of each triterpene acid referring to oleanolic acid calibration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Analytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Varian MS-500 mass spectrometer with electrospray ionization source (Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used. The obtained data were processed using MS Workstation software (Varian Inc.). The analytes were electrosprayed in the positive mode (ESI(+)-MS). Fragmentation in the ESI-MS2 and ESI-MS3 mode was carried out in the scanning range of m/z 50–500. The source temperature was 350 °C, and the carrier and ionizing gases were nitrogen and helium, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Purification and Characterization of Phytochemicals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methanol, acetonitrile, formic acid, rutin, phloridzin and catechin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy). Procyanidin B2, oleanolic acid, asiatic acid were obtained from Extrasynthese (Genay Cedex, France). An Agilent Eclipse XDB C-18 3.0 × 150 mm (3.5 µm) was used as stationary phase for analytical procedures. For semipreparative HPLC separation of triterpene acids, an Agilent Eclipse C-18 30 × 210 mm (5 µm) stationary phase was used. An Agilent 1100 system equipped with 1100 series diode array, Sedex 60 Evaporative Light Scattering Detector (ELSD) and Agilent 1260 series fraction collector was used for purification of triterpene acids. For LC-DAD-MS analysis an Agilent 1260 chromatograph equipped with 1260 series diode array was used (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). After the chromatography column a “T” junction split the flow to DAD and Varian MS 500 mass spectrometer (Varian, Santa Clara, CA, USA). MS spectra were acquired using two different approaches, one using Electrospray (ESI) and one Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization (APCI) sources for polyphenols and triterpenes, respectively. For both analyses the spectrometer operated in negative ion mode acquiring spectra in the range m/z 50–2000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!