The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Phoenix 64

Manufactured by Pharsight
Sourced in United States

The Phoenix 64 is a high-performance laboratory equipment designed for conducting advanced analytical and research tasks. It features a powerful 64-bit processing architecture, enabling efficient data processing and analysis. The core function of the Phoenix 64 is to provide reliable and accurate results for a wide range of laboratory applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

3 protocols using phoenix 64

1

Pharmacokinetics of LEO 134310 in Rats and Dogs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pharmacokinetic profile of LEO 134310 was determined in rat (male Sprague Dawley) and dog (female Beagle) after intravenous (i.v.) injection at 1 mg/kg. LEO 134310 was administered in isotonic cyclodextrin solution at 0.5 mg/mL (0.1% Citrate buffer pH 4, 20% hydroxy-propyl-β-cyclodextrin in 0.2% NaCl). The i.v. dose was given as a bolus in rats and as a slow injection over 2 min in dogs. The dosing volume was 2 mL/kg. Blood was immediately diluted after sampling in an inhibitory cocktail containing acetylcholinesterase inhibitor Dichlorvos [1 mg/mL in an 8 mg/mL K2EDTA solution in phosphate buffer (PBS)] and samples were stored at − 80 °C until analysis. Samples were analyzed by LC–MS/MS using an API 5500/API 6500 QTRAP mass spectrometer. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from a non-compartment model in Phoenix64 (Pharsight, Certara).
To evaluate allometric scaling, actual clearance in dog and man were extracted from the literature for 6 ester drugs27 (link)–38 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Selumetinib Pharmacokinetic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Demographic information and clinical outcomes were analyzed descriptively and summarized in terms of frequencies and percentages for categorical variables or medians and ranges for continuous variables. Pharmacokinetic analysis for selumetinib was performed by noncompartmental methods using the WinNonlin, Version 6.3, Phoenix 64 (Pharsight, Cary, NC), and data are summarized using geometric means and coefficient of variations (CV) for Cmax and AUC. Tmax, T1/2 Cl/F, V/F and log-transformed AUC and Cmax values were summarized in terms of means ± standard. Comparisons of PK parameters between dose levels were conducted using a log-normal model (Cmax and AUC) and ttwo-sample t-test (dose normalized AUC and Cmax). All P-values are two-sided and p < 0.05 is used to define statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cannabinoid Pharmacokinetics and Safety

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AEs were tabulated and classified by System Organ Class (SOC) and preferred term using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (version 22.1). Safety data were summarized using descriptive statistics. PK parameters for THC, CBD and metabolites were calculated using non-compartmental analysis (Phoenix 64 version 8.1, Pharsight, a Certara Company, USA). Individual PK parameters and plasma concentration over time were summarized using descriptive statistics. Pre-dose Ctrough plasma levels of CBD and THC at each dose were compared across Days 5–7 for assessment of steady state (where the contrast was not statistically significant, P < 0.05) using a mixed effect analysis of variance (ANOVA). On Days 1, 3 and 7, peak post-treatment value (Emax) for each DEQ item was analyzed using ANOVA, with treatment group as fixed effect and participant as random effect. Least square mean (LSmean) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) reported for each treatment group and for each paired difference between groups were adjusted with Tukey multiple comparison tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!