The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

67 protocols using anti c myc

1

Immunoblotting of Transfected Cell Lysates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblotting was performed as detailed elsewhere [18 (link), 74 (link)]. Transfected cells were lysed in NP40 buffer with 6M urea (20 mM Tris HCl pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 0.6 % NP-40, 2 mM EDTA) for 20 minutes on ice. The proteins were then separated from the cell debris by centrifugation at 7,000 g during 10 minute. The proteins were denatured by the addition of Laemmli 1 x loading buffer before analysis by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using anti-Flag (1:1,000; M2; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), anti-C-Myc (1:50) 9E10, anti-GAPDH (1:2,000; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) monoclonal antibodies and rabbit polyclonal anti-P/V antiserum (1:40,000 [75 (link)]).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Plasmid Constructs for NF-κB Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following expression plasmids were used in this study: pYNC989 (vFLIP-myc), pNF-kB-Luc (Stratagene), pGL4.70[hRluc] (Promega) and pcDNA3.1. pCMV-myc-RAUL-WT and the pCMV-myc-RAUL dominant negative mutant (C1051A) were provided by Cecile Pickart [17] (link). pSEW R01 (WT RTA), pSEW R03, pSEW R04, pSEW R06, pSEW R11 and RTA H145L have been described previously [13] (link), [18] (link). V5 tagged RTA 11–149 was cloned into pcDNA3.1 using the following primers: F- 5′-ATCGGAATTCGTTATGGTTCGGCGGTCCTGTGTGGAAAG and R-5′-TATATCTAGATTTTCACGTAGAATCGAGACCGAGGAGAGGGTTAGGGATAG GCTTACCCAGGCATTTGGCCTTCATTTCAG. The following reagents were used in this study: MG132 (Boston Biochem), doxycycline (Sigma), hygromycin (Roche), and antibodies anti-cmyc (Millipore), anti-tubulin (Sigma), anti-β-actin (Sigma), rabbit anti-RTA and rabbit anti-RAUL (24, 25).)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

ChIP Assay for c-Myc Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP assays were performed as described previously36 (link). Briefly, after puromycin selection, cells were sonicated, and chromatin (25 µg) was immunoprecipitated by adding the antibody of interest followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C. The following antibodies were used for ChIP: Anti-c-Myc and Normal Rabbit IgG (12–370, Millipore, Burlington, USA). Immunoprecipitated fractions and 5% input were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR in duplicate using the SYBR Green Master Mix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with specific primers (mentioned in the Supplementary Table S2) of predicted c-Myc binding regions. Normalization was performed to input using the formula: [2^(Ct input – CT immunoprecipitation)]. Resultant values were further normalized relative to the rabbit Ig control ChIP values for the primer set. Student’s t-test was used to identify the significance between two different groups. P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunoblotting of Epitope-Tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The agro-infiltrated leaf tissues were homogenized in 500 μl of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 2 mM Na3VO4, 25 mM β-glycerophosphate, 10 mM NaF, 0.05–0.1% Tween, 1 mM PMSF, pH 7.5). The homogenates were centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C, then the supernatants were collected and the protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method64 (link). Aliquots of 50 μg of protein were separated on 8% acrylamide gels and were then electro-transferred to PVDF membranes using the Bio-Rad gel transfer apparatus in TBST buffer for 1 h. Membranes were blocked in a 3% BSA/TBST buffer solution at room temperature for 0.5 h, followed by incubation with the appropriate primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight [anti-FLAG, Abmart, cat # M20008 at 1:1000 dilution; anti-HA, Roche, cat # 12013819001 at 1:1000 dilution; anti-c-Myc, Millipore, cat # 05-724 at 1:1000 dilution). Following incubation, the membranes were washed three times with TBST and incubated with an HRP-conjugated goat, anti-mouse secondary antibody (Abmart, lot # M21001 at 1:1000 dilution). The blots were washed again three times with TBST buffer and the immunoreactive bands were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

c-Myc Binding Regulation of SPTLC1 Promoter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay was performed using anti- c-myc and a ChIP assay kit (Millipore, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Anti-IgG antibody was used as the negative control. Briefly, HOS-MNNG and ZOSM cells were fixed, harvested, and sonicated, and the samples immunoprecipitated with the respective antibodies. The bound DNA fragments were subjected to qPCR using four primer sets to amplify the c-myc-binding region(s) of the SPTLC1 promoter. Primers used to amplify specific genomic regions are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunodetection and Western Blotting Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunodetection: anti-Smad4 (#38454, 1:200, Cell Signaling), anti-Jagged1 (AF599, 1 μg/ ml, R&D systems), anti-α-SMA (CY3-SMA, #C6198, 1:200, Sigma), anti-pS6 (#5364, 1:200, Cell Signaling), IB4 (#121412, 10 μg/ml, Life Technologies), anti-FOXO1 (#2880, 1:100, Cell Signaling), anti-cMYC (#6340, 1:100, Millipore), anti-KLF4 (#AF3158, 1:200, R&D systems), anti-NG2 (#Ab5320; 1:200, EMD Millipore), anti-PH3 (#06570; 1:500, EMD Millipore), anti-EPHB4 (#AF446, 1:100, R&D systems), anti-UNC5B (#AF1006, 1:100, R&D systems) anti-NRP2 (#AF567, 1:100, R&D systems).
For western blotting: anti-ALK1 (7R-49334, 1:1000, Fitzgerald), anti-Smad4 (#38454, 1:1.000, Cell Signaling), anti-pAKT (#4060, 1:1.000, Cell Signaling), anti-AKT (#9272, 1:1.000, Cell Signaling), anti-pPTEN (#9549, 1:1.000, Cell Signaling) and anti-PTEN (#9188, 1:1.000, Cell Signaling) and anti β-ACTIN (#A1978 1:3000, Sigma).
Appropriate secondary antibodies were fluorescently labelled (Alexa Fluor donkey anti-rabbit, Alexa Fluor donkey anti-goat) or conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Anti-Rabbit and Anti-mouse IgG (H+L), 1:8.000, Vector Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blotting Analysis of Cell Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting analysis was performed according to standard methods as previously described.12 (link) The following primary antibodies were used: anti-Sam68 (sc-333, dilution, 1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Delaware Ave Santa Cruz, CA), anti-beta-catenin, anticyclin D1, anti-p21cip1, anti-p27KIP1, anti-p-Rb, antitotal-Rb, anti-p-AKT, antitotal-AKT, anti-c-Myc (1:1000, Millipore, Billerica, MA), anti-P-84, anti-LEF-1 (1:500, Abcam, Cambridge, MA), anti-α-tubulin, anti-TCF-4, anti-LEF1, and anti-GAPDH (1:1000, Sigma, Saint Louis, MO). Nuclear extracts were prepared using the Nuclear Extraction Kit (Active Motif), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Analysis of FoxO1 Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HUVEC and ISO-HAS-B cells were cultured on gelatin coated coverslips and were either left untreated or transfected for ectopic expression of FoxO1 mutants. Cells were fixed for 10 min with 4% paraformaldehyde, washed with PBS and then permeabilized with 0.5% Triton-100 × -PBS for 10 min. Subsequently cells were blocked with 5% FCS 0.01% Tween-20-PBS for 30 min followed by incubation with anti-aPKC (1:100; Beckton Dickison), anti-VE-cadherin (1:100; R&D Systems); anti-c-Myc (1:100; Millipore); and anti-FLAG-M2 (1:400; Sigma) overnight at 4°C. Coverslips were then washed and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies (Alexafluor fluorescently conjugated; 1:400; Invitrogen) and Hoescht 33342 or DAPI, and mounted with Vectashield.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Expression Analysis in Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FSEC at confluence were washed three times with cold PBS 1x supplemented with 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, and then lysed in ice with Complete Tablet buffer (Roche) supplemented with 2 mM sodium orthovanadate and 50 μM MG132 (Sigma-Aldrich). Thirty-five μg of proteins from each lysate were loaded on 15 or 5 % SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (PVDF, GE Healthcare Europe GmbH, Milan, Italy). They were incubated overnight at 4 °C with specific primary antibody: anti-PAX8 (1:500, Abnova, DBA ITALIA S.r.l., Milan, Italy), anti-VDR (1:200, Santa-Cruz), anti-p53 (1:500, Santa-Cruz), anti-cMyc (1:200, Millipore S.p.A., Milan, Italy), anti-Ki67 (1:500, Santa-Cruz), and anti-pan-Ras (1:500, Santa-Cruz). Protein expression was normalized and verified through ß-actin detection (1:5000; Sigma, Milan, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Proteasome Inhibition and Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MG132 (Boston Biochem) was used for proteasome inhibition. The following plasmids were generously provided by Annie Angers Flag-Itch and Flag-Itch-C830A (Angers et al., 2004 (link)). myc-vFLIP (pYNC989) and RTA (pSEW-R01) were provided by Gary Hayward and were described previously (Ehrlich et al., 2014 (link); Wang et al., 2003 (link); Yu et al., 2005 (link)). Recombinant V5-His-vFLIP: vFLIP was cloned into pET-DEST42 using Gateway cloning technology (Invitrogen). HA tagged ubiquitin was provided by Joanna Shisler.
The following antibodies were used: anti-RTA (G. Hayward), anti-cmyc (Millipore), anti-Itch (BD Biosciences), anti-β-actin (ThermoScientific), anti-tubulin (ThermoScientific), anti-Flag (Sigma-Aldrich) Secondary antibodies were either HRP or AP labled and obtained from Jackson ImmunoResearch.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!