The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

109 protocols using kod plus

1

Engineered Orthologous TadAs-Derived Base Editors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TadA-8e and codon-optimized engineered orthologous TadAs were synthesized commercially (Synbio Technologies). The mutagenesis strategy (KOD-plus, Toyobo, Cat#: KOD-201) was used to induce specific mutations for corresponding base editors. To generate TadA ortholog-derived base editors, the docking site at residue 1249 was initially inserted with SpeI-NLS-BamHI-NheI-linker-XbaI sequence, and then engineered orthologous TadAs were inserted via BamHI-NheI double digestion strategy. Plasmids expressing dSaCas9-UGI-T2A-mCherry and U6-sgsaRNA, which were used in R-loop assay, were derived from PX602 (Addgene #61593), in which D10A and N580A were induced via mutagenesis strategy (KOD-plus, Toyobo, Cat#: KOD-201), and then UGI-T2A-mCherry cassette was inserted through BamHI-EcoRI double digestion strategy. SgRNA expression vectors were U6-sgRNA-EF1alpha-UGI-T2A-mCherry as described previously, and to generate plasmid expressing sgRNAs for puromycin-based enrichment, mCherry was replaced with a puromycin resistance gene. Information for sgRNAs used in this study was listed in Supplementary Data 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation and Sequencing of P35S Promoter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primers used for isolating the P35S sequences from different transgenic events were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 software (PREMIER Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA) according to the nucleotide sequences flanking the P35S promoter. Primers were synthesized by Sangon (Shanghai, China); their sequences are given in Supplementary Table S3 online. The PCR samples were prepared using a KOD-Plus kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) in a sample volume of 50 μL containing 20 ng of genomic DNA, 1× KOD-Plus PCR buffer, 200 μM of each dNTP, 1 mM MgSO4, 100 nM of each primer, and 0.5 units of KOD-Plus DNA polymerase. PCRs were performed on a C1000™ Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA) using the following program: 94°C for 2 min (initial denaturation); 35 cycles of 94°C for 15 s (denaturation) and 68°C for 3 min (annealing and extension); and 68°C for 7 min (final extension). PCR products harboring a target band were recovered and subcloned into the pZErO-2 vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) via an EcoRV restriction enzyme site. Ligation products were transformed into Escherichia coli strain TOP10F (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and positive clones screened. Plasmids containing the PCR products were sequenced using M13 forward and reverse primers (Tsingke, Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Identification and Structural Modeling of SmsHSP24.1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The putative eggplant mitochondria localized nuclear SmsHSP24.1 gene was identified using NCBI expressed sequence tags (ESTs) database (Supplementary Figure 1A). The full-length SmsHSP24.1 cDNA was amplified by nested PCR using a high-fidelity DNA polymerase (KOD plus, Toyobo, Japan) with primer pairs of SmsHSP24.1_F1/R1 and F2/R2 (Supplementary Table 2) and cloned into PCR-4-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, United States). Sequence confirmation was done using universal M13 forward and reverse primers through the Macrogen sequencing platform (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (macrogen.com/ko). MODELLER 9 version 11 (Sali et al., 1995 (link)) program was used for homology modeling of SmsHSP24.1 against Mito_AtHsp21 (Protein databank ID P31170) (Supplementary Figure 1B). Evaluation tools ProCheck (Laskowski, 1993 (link)) and Verify3D (Eisenberg et al., 1997 (link)) were applied to assess the predicted three-dimensional model of SmsHSP24.1 protein. The Muscle (Edgar, 2004 (link)) program was used for multiple sequence alignment, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGAX (Kumar et al., 2018 (link)) according to the neighbor-joining method with bootstrap value 1,000 (Supplementary Figure 1C).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cloning of AOBGL11 cDNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 4

Cloning of cDNA of AOBGL11

BGL11-1 strain was cultured in 10 mL of a culture medium for enzyme production, and the cells were collected by filtration. The cells were frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground in a mortar, and total RNA was then extracted using RNeasy (QIAGEN). cDNA was synthesized using the SuperScript Double-Stranded cDNA Synthesis Kit (Life Technologies). Using this cDNA as a template, PCR was performed with the primers AOBGL11-F and AOBGL11-R, using KOD-Plus (Toyobo). About 2.52 kbp of the resulting DNA fragment was cloned as AOBGL11 cDNA using the Zero Blunt TOPO PCR cloning Kit (Invitrogen), thus obtaining a plasmid pCR-AOBGL11 cDNA. The nucleotide sequence was confirmed, and was as shown in SEQ ID NO: 1. The comparison between the genomic DNA sequence and the cDNA sequence of AOBGL11 is shown in FIG. 3.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Plasmid Construction and Cloning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TetO-FUW-cMYC was a gift from Rudolf Jaenisch (Addgene plasmid # 20324). The pLL3.7 vector (provided by Luk Van Parijs) was modified by replacing the EGFP gene with the zeocin resistance gene. All shRNA targeting sequences (Supplementary Table 1) were designed and BLASTed to ensure specificity. The oligonucleotides encoding target shRNA were cloned as described before [59 (link)]. The pPyCAGIP expression vector was a gift from Ian Chambers. The full-length ORF of Nac1 was PCR-amplified from mouse ESC cDNA using KOD-Plus- (TOYOBO). The amplified ORF was subsequently cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega) for sequence verification, and then subcloned into pPyCAGIP. The 3×FLAG fragments were generated from the p3×FLAG-CMV plasmid via PCR, and subcloned in-frame into the expression vectors. The c-Myc promoter (positions 2520 to +525) was amplified by PCR from mouse genomic DNA and inserted into pGL3-basic vector (Promega). The primers for construction are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genomic DNA Extraction and Molecular Marker Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh leaves of each plant using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Murray and Thompson, 1980). The polymorphic simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers, randomly distributed across the 12 rice chromosomes, are listed in Table S2. PCRs for amplification of the SSRs were conducted according to the methods in Jin et al. (2010) and the products were run on an 8% denaturing polyacrylamide gel at 120 V for 100 min and the gel was visualized using silver staining. Hd1, including the 1825‐bp coding region, was amplified from genomic DNA using KOD plus (TOYOBO, Tokyo, Japan). PCRs were conducted using standard PCR protocols. The primers used for PCR and sequencing are listed in Table S4. The initial genomic sequence of Hd1 was assembled using DNA star software (DNAStar Inc., Madison, WI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Generation and Validation of ACE2 Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequences of siRNAs used in this study are listed in Table S1, Supporting Information. Primer sequences used for qRT–PCR are listed in Table S2, Supporting Information. ACE2 were subcloned from pcDNA3.1 recombinant plasmid (provided by Prof. Wang PH, Shandong University, China) into the pLV‐C‐Flag bc puro lentivirus vector and pLVX‐C‐AcGFP‐N1 vector. Point mutations were generated by the site‐directed mutagenesis with KOD plus (Toyobo) polymerase. All constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing. Anti‐cancer component library were from SelleckChem. 2‐bromopalmitate (2BP) was from Sigma (#18263‐25‐7); ML348 was from MCE (HY‐100736); Hieff Trans in vitro siRNA/miRNA Transfection Reagent (Cat No. 40806; Yeasen, Shanghai, China) 17‐ODYA was from APExBIO (# 34450‐18‐5); and GW4869 was from MCE (HY‐19363).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genome Editing Protocol Using CRISPR-Cas9

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell culture reagents, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) and penicillin/streptomycin, were obtained from Nakalai Tesque (Kyoto, Japan). Plasmids used in this study, lentiCRISPRv2 (#98290), pCAG-EGxxFP (#50716) (28 (link)), pX330 Cetn1/1 (#50718), and pCAG-EGxxFP-Cetn1 (#50717), were obtained from Addgene (www.addgene.org). lentiCRISPRv2 puro was a gift from Brett Stringer. Synthetic oligonucleotides were obtained from Eurofin Genomics (Tokyo, Japan). DNA iso, RNAiso, Guide-it mutation detection kit, and pMD20-T TA cloning vector were purchased from Takara bio (Kyoto, Japan). Thunderbird® SYBR qPCR Mix, KOD-PLUS, and ReverTraAce were obtained from Toyobo (Tokyo, Japan). PEImax 40000 was obtained from Polyscience Inc. (Warrington, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cloning and Sequencing of Photosynthesis Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNAs were extracted using either an RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) or a FastPure® RNA Kit (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using PrimeScript™ II 1st strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara Bio) with oligo-dT primers provided by the manufacturer. Procedures for cDNA cloning are described in the Supplementary information. Briefly, partial fragments of targeted genes for SrPK, SrPEPtase, SrPEPC, and SrPEPCK were first amplified using PCR with Takara Ex Taq® (Takara Bio) and the primers are listed in Supplementary Table 2. Gene-specific primers were then designed to perform 5′- and 3′-rapid amplification of cDNA ends using SMARTer™RACE cDNA Amplification Kit (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). To isolate full-length cDNAs, final PCR amplifications were performed with the KOD -Plus- (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) with the primers shown in Supplementary Table 2. The obtained fragments were cloned into the T-Vector (pMD19, Takara Bio) and sequenced in both directions. Full-length sequences were determined by isolating at least 2 independent clones with identical sequences. DNA sequences were analyzed using GENETYX software (Genetyx, Tokyo, Japan). Complete cDNAs encoding SrPEPC, SrPK, SrPEPCK, and SrPEPtase were deposited in the DNA Data Bank of Japan with Accession numbers LC155943, LC155944, LC155945, and LC155946, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

CESA4 Gene Mutant Complementation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 5000 F2 mapping population was generated from the cross between fc17 and MH63, an indica cultivar in China. All plants were cultivated in the experimental fields at the Shenyang Agricultural University during the natural growing season. The segregation ratio in F2 population showed that the normal plants and Brittle Culm plants segregated as 3:1. The fc17 gene was localized to 91-kb genomic region that contains the CESA4 gene. The CESA4 gene of the mutant and its corresponding WT were PCR amplified with KOD-PLUS (TOYOBO) and sequenced with a 3730 sequencer (ABI). For complementation analysis, a 8.53-kb genomic DNA fragment containing the entire CESA4 coding region, a 1.8-kb upstream sequence, and a 1.5-kb downstream sequence were cloned into the binary vector pCAMBIA 1305 to generate the transformation plasmid. The binary plasmids were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 and transformed into the fc17 mutant plants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!