The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nanoelectrospray ion source

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in Germany, United States

The Nanoelectrospray ion source is a lab equipment used for the ionization of analytes during mass spectrometry analysis. It generates a fine spray of charged droplets from a liquid sample, enabling the efficient transfer of ions into the mass spectrometer for detection and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

56 protocols using nanoelectrospray ion source

1

Protease Analysis of S. fusiformis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein sequence analysis of protease from S. fusiformis was performed nano-Reverse Phase LC coupled to a QExactive Hybrid Quadrupole—Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) through a nanoelectrospray ion source (ThermoScientific, Bremen, Germany) as following: a protein band of protease was in gel-digested for 3 h at 37 °C by trypsin. The resulting peptide mixture was resolved and applied on LC–MS/MS. Raw MS files were analyzed by the MaxQuant v1.5.3.3 proteomics software package. Precursor and MS/MS mass tolerance was set to 20 ppm for the first search (for the identification of the maximum number of peptides for mass and retention time calibration) and 4.5 ppm for the main search (for the refinement of the identifications). Protein and peptide false discovery rate (FDR) were set to 1%. FDR was calculated based on the number of spectra matched to peptides of a random proteome database (reversed sequence database) in relation to the number of spectra matching to the reference proteome. Peptide features were aligned between different runs and masses were matched (“match between runs” feature), with a match time window of 3 min and a mass alignment window of 20 min. Protein quantification was performed using the iBAQ algorithm through MaxQuant software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nano-ESI-MS Analysis of Metal-Ligand Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Direct infusion nano-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry was carried out in positive ionization mode on a Thermo Electron LTQ-Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer equipped with a nano electrospray ion source (ThermoFisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) and operated under Xcalibur software 2.2 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) as described by Kubicova et al. [32 (link)]. Theoretical masses and characteristic iron isotopic patterns were calculated by Xcalibur software 2.2 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). The mass spectra were recorded for various metal-to-ligand ratios (2:1, 1:1, 1:2 and 1:4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ubiquitin Remnant Motif Enrichment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysis, digestion and peptide desalting procedure was done as previously described54 . N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) was used as the alkylating reagent.
Peptide pre-fractionation, antibody cross-linking, and K-ε-GlyGly affinity enrichment was done using the PTMScan® Ubiquitin Remnant Motif (K-ε-GlyGly) Kit #5562 from Cell Signaling Technology with some modifications55 as described54 .
K-ε-GlyGly enriched peptide samples were analysed using an EASY II nano-UPLC (Thermo Scientific) connected on-line to an Orbitrap Elite hybrid and Fusion tribrid mass spectrometers with a nanoelectrospray ion source (Thermo Scientific) using settings and instrument arrangements similar to those previously described56 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Identification of Synthetic Peptides by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mixture consisting of 19 synthetic peptides obtained from the Challenge organizing team was analyzed using Dionex Ultimate 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) connected to a Hybrid Ion Trap-Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), equipped with a nanoelectrospray ion source (Thermo Scientific). Peptides were loaded onto the trap column Zorbax 300SB-C18 (C18 5 μm 0.3 mm inner diameter and 5 mm length, Agilent Technologies, USA) and washed for 5 min at a flow rate of 10 μl/min. Peptide separation was performed on a RP-HPLC Zorbax 300SB-C18 column (C18 3.5 μm 75 μm inner diameter and 150 mm length, Agilent Technologies, USA) using a linear gradient from 5% to 60% solvent B (0.1% formic acid, 80% acetonitrile) over 30 min at a flow rate of 0.4 μl/min.
CID has been used as a fragmentation method. Both MS and MS/MS spectra have been obtained in an orbitrap analyzer. Resolution was set at 60,000 (m/z400) for MS and 15,000 (m/z400) for MS/MS scans.
The mass spectra have been analyzed using the trial version of PEAKS (Bioinformatics solutions Inc.) [1 ] and SearchGUI [2 ] with the parameters described in the next section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nano-LC-MS/MS Peptide Separation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were eluted from StageTips with 50 μl buffer B (80% acetonitrile (ACN) and 0.5% acetic acid), the organic solvent was removed in a SpeedVac concentrator for 20 min, and peptides were resuspended in 10 μl of Buffer A (2% ACN and 0.1% TFA). 3 μl of each sample was analyzed by nanoflow liquid chromatography on an EASY-nLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) on-line coupled to an Q Exactive HF-X quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) through a nanoelectrospray ion source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A 50 cm column with 75 μm inner diameter was used for the chromatography, in-house packed with 3 μm reversed-phase silica beads (ReproSil-Pur C18-AQ, Dr. Maisch GmbH, Germany). Peptides were separated and directly electrosprayed into the mass spectrometer using a linear gradient from 5% to 60% ACN in 0.5% acetic acid over 120 min at a constant flow of 300 nl/min. The linear gradient was followed by a washout with up to 95% ACN to clean the column for the next run. The overall gradient length was 145 min. The QExactive HF-X was operated in a data-dependent mode, switching automatically between one full-scan and subsequent MS/MS scans of the fifteen most abundant peaks (Top15 method), with full-scans (m/z 300–1650) acquired in the Orbitrap analyzer with a resolution of 60,000 at 100 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Proteomic Workflow for LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tryptic peptide fractions and lysates were reconstituted in 20 μL 3% acetonitrile/0.1% FA/doubly distilled water, and 1 ug per sample was loaded onto an EASY-nano-HPLC system (Proxeon) equipped with a RP-HPLC column (75 μm × 10.5 cm) packed in-house with 10 cm stationary phase (Magic C18 AQ 1.9 μm, 200 Å, Michrom BioResources). The HPLC was coupled to a QExactive plus MS (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a nano-electrospray ion source (Thermo Scientific). Peptides were loaded onto the column with buffer A (0.1% FA) and were eluted with 300 nL min−1 buffer B (99.9% ACN, 0.1% FA). Subsequently, the column was washed with 98% buffer B. The tryptic peptide fractions were eluted with a 100 min gradient of 5–20% B followed by a 20 min gradient from 20–28% B, and a final 4-min step from 28–50% B. The column was washed with 98% buffer B. The MS was operated in data-dependent manner, with an automatic switch between MS to MS/MS scans. High-resolution MS scans were acquired (70,000, target value 106) within 300–1700 m/z. The 15 most intense precursor ions were fragmented using higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) to acquire MS/MS scans (minimum signal threshold 420, target value 5 × 104, isolation width 1.5 m/z). Unassigned and singly charged ions were excluded from HCD, and dynamic exclusion was set to 30 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Proteomic Workflow Using Q Exactive

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were analysed with the Easy-nLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific), connected online to a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a nanoelectrospray ion source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Tryptic peptides were loaded in a fused silica column (75  µm inner diameter) packed with C18 resin (3-µm beads, Reprosil, Dr. Maisch), with solvent A (0.5% acetic acid). They were then eluted with a 120-minute gradient of solvent B (80% acetonitrile, 0.5% acetic acid) with a constant flow of 250 nL/min. The Q exactive was operated in positive mode with a capillary temperature of 250 °C, using the data-dependent acquisition method, which switches from full MS scans to MS/MS scans for the 12 most intense ions. Fragmentation was achieved by higher-energy collisional dissociation with a normalized collisional energy of 25. Full MS ranged from 300 to 1,750 m/z at a resolution of 70,000, an automatic gain control of 1e6, and a maximum injection time of 120 ms, whereas MS/MS events were scanned at a resolution of 35,000, an automatic gain control of 1e5, maximum injection time of 124 ms, isolation windows of 2 m/z, and an exclusion window of 45 seconds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Proteomic Analysis of Immunoprecipitated Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dried immunoprecipitated peptides were resuspend in Buffer A (0.2% Formic Acid, 2% ACN, nanoLC grade 97.8% H2O) and subjected to proteomic analysis using an EASY II nano-UPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific) connected on-line to an Orbitrap Elite hybrid mass spectrometer with a nanoelectrospray ion source (Thermo Scientific) using settings similar to those previously described (Porras-Yakushi et al., 2015 (link)). Peptides were separated using a 15 cm silica analytical column with a 75 μm inner diameter packed in-house with reversed phase ReproSil-Pur C18AQ 3 μm resin (Dr Maisch GmbH, Amerbuch-Entringen, Germany). The flow rate was set to 350 nl/min, using a linear gradient of 2%-32% B (0.2% Formic Acid, 80% ACN, 19.8% nanoLC grade H2O). Mass spectrometry detectable samples were analyzed on a 159 min gradient, while basic reversed phase immunoprecipitated samples were analyzed on a 90 min gradient. The mass spectrometer was set to collect data in a data-dependent mode, switching automatically between full-scan MS and tandem MS acquisition. All samples were analyzed by ETD and decision tree fragmentation. For ETD fragmentation, the fifteen most intense precursor ions were selected, while the 20 most intense ions were selected for fragmentation using the decision tree method. Data acquisition was managed using Xcalibur 2.0.7 and Tune 2.4 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Nano-LC-MS/MS Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All MS experiments were performed on a nanoscale EASY-nLC 1200 UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) connected to an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos equipped with a nanoelectrospray ion source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Mobile phase A contained 0.1% formic acid (v/v) in water; mobile phase B contained 0.1% formic acid in 80% acetonitrile. The peptides were dissolved in 0.1% formic acid with 2% acetonitrile and separated on a RP-HPLC analytical column (75 μm×25 cm) packed with 2 μm C18 beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a linear gradient ranging from 6% to 26% B in 90 min and followed by a linear increase to 44% B in 15 min at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. The Orbitrap Fusion Lumos acquired data in a manner that alternated between full-scan MS and MS2 scans. The spray voltage was set at 2.2 kV and the temperature of ion transfer capillary was 300 °C. The MS spectra (350−1750 m/z) were collected with a resolution of 60,000, AGC target of 600,000 charges, and a maximal injection time of 60 ms. Precursor ions were isolated with a window of 1.3 m/z, with an AGC target of 200,000 charges, a resolution of 60,000, and a maximal injection time of 120 ms. The precursor fragmentation was accomplished using electron transfer dissociation (ETD) in positive ion mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cardiovascular Proteome Modulation by Meditation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, DIA discovery proteomics was used to systematically investigate the cardiovascular-related proteome mediated by meditation. PRM targeted proteomics was applied to validate the key cardiovascular-related proteins identified in the DIA stage. The two-stage proteomics procedure was applied on two cohorts of Tibetan samples (Figure 1b). Plasma was collected and abundant proteins were removed using PierceTMTop 12 Abundant Proteins Depletion Spin Columns (85165, Thermo Fisher Scientific, NC, U.S.) prior to enzyme digestion. The Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer interfaced with a nano electrospray ion source (Thermo Fisher Scientific, NC, U.S.) was applied for proteome detection. The detailed mass spectrometry methods are in the Supplementary Method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!