The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dig dutp

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in China

DIG-dUTP is a nucleotide analog that can be used for the detection and localization of nucleic acid sequences. It contains a digoxigenin (DIG) label that can be detected using anti-DIG antibodies. DIG-dUTP can be incorporated into DNA or RNA during synthesis or labeling experiments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using dig dutp

1

LINC00673 in situ Hybridization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In situ hybridization was performed to detect LINC00673 expression as previously described [55 (link)–57 (link)]. Three probes from different LINC00673 regions (5′-GAAAAACCTCTTG CACCACCTTAGTCTCCAAAGA-3′, 5′-CTTTCCTGTTCTTTCTCCTACCCTTCCTGAC TAG -3′, and 5′-CATGAAGTAATAATAAAGGTTCCGCTTATCAACC-3′) were synthesized and labeled with DIG-dUTP at the 3′ end (Invitrogen, Shanghai, China). Three GAPDH probes used as positive controls were 5′-CCACTTTACCAGAGTTAAAAGCAGCCCTGG-3′, 5′-CAGTAGAGGCAGGGATGATGTTCTGGAGAG-3′, and 5′-GTCAGAGGAGACC ACCTGGTGCTCAGTGTA-3′. A semi-quantitative scoring criterion for in situ hybridization was used in which both the staining intensity and the number of positive cells were recorded. The scoring was graded as 0 (negative), 1 (< 10% positive), 2 (10% - 50% positive), or 3 (> 50% positive) in accordance with the staining proportion and intensity. The final scores were regarded as low expression (0-1) and high expression (2-3). All sections were scored in randomly selected five representative fields of vision at medium magnification by two pathologists who were blinded to the clinicopathological features and the clinical data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying LINC00152 Expression via ISH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In situ hybridization was performed to detect LINC00152 expression as previously described 45 (link)-48 (link). Three probes from different LINC00152 regions (5'-CTATGTCTTAATCCCT TGTCCTTCATTAAAAGC-3', 5'-CTTCATTGAACA GTTTGTATATTGGAAACTTGCC-3', and 5'-GCTGCTTTTAAGTTTCAAATTGACATTCCAGAC-3') were synthesized and labeled with DIG-dUTP at the 3' end (Invitrogen, Shanghai, China). Three GAPDH probes used as positive controls were 5'-CCACTTTACCAGAGTTAAAAGCAGCCCTGG-3', 5'-CAGTAGAGGCAGGG ATGATGTTCTGGAGAG-3', and 5'-GTCAGAGGAGACCACCTGGTGCTCAGT GTA-3'. A semi-quantitative scoring criterion for in situ hybridization was used in which both the staining intensity and the number of positive cells were recorded. The scoring was graded as 0 (negative), 1 (< 10% positive), 2 (10% - 50% positive), or 3 (> 50% positive) in accordance with the staining proportion and intensity. The final scores were regarded as low expression (0-1) and high expression (2-3). The scores corresponding to the overall distribution of LINC00152 were averaged across the different tumor plugs in each case. All sections were independently scored by two pathologists who were blinded to the clinicopathological features and the clinical data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Situ Detection of AFAP1-AS1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In situ hybridization was performed to detect AFAP1-AS1 expression in tissue specimens using three 30-base nucleotide probes from different AFAP1-AS1 regions. The AFAP1-AS1 probes were5′- ATTCCTTTATTTTATGGGATGTTCTGTAGGGAGTT-3′,5′-TAGAAATGAGAAAAGAATCACCAAGAGAGTAAGCA-3′, and 5′- CCCTACAGCTAGTTTCCTCTTCATTTATTCATTT-3′. Three GAPDH probes used as positive controls were 5′-CCACTTTACCAGAGTTAAAAGCAGCCCTGG-3′, 5′-CAGTAGAGGCAGGGATGATGTTCTGGAGAG-3′, and 5′-GTCAGAGGAGACCACCTGGTGCTCAGT GTA-3′. The probes were synthetized and labeled with DIG-dUTP at the 3′ end using a kit from Invitrogen (Shanghai, China). In situ hybridization was performed as previously described [45 (link)]. A semi-quantitative scoring criterion for in situ hybridization was used in which both the staining intensity and the number of positive cells were recorded. All sections were independently scored by two pathologists who were blinded to the clinicopathological features and the clinical data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

AFAP1-AS1 Expression Analysis in Lung Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three different nucleotide probes of AFAP1-AS1 labeled with DIG-dUTP at both of the 3′ and 5′ ends (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) were used for ISH experiment in lung cancer specimens. After paraffin sections were dewaxed, hydrated and blocked with endogenous peroxidase, the ISH kit (Boster, Wuhan, China) was used to detect AFAP1-AS1 expression in lung cancer tissues.
The ISH results were scored according to the staining area and depth. The scoring criteria of staining area were as follows: when the number of positive cells was 0, then the score assigned was 0; 5% < positive cells < 25% were scored 1; 25% < positive cells < 50% were scored 2; 50% < positive cells < 75% were scored 3; positive cells >75% were scored 4. The following is the scoring criteria of color depth. Zero points were assigned when the tissue was not colored. One point is assigned when the tissue appeared light yellow. When the tissue was colored light brown, then 2 points were assigned. When the tissue was stained dark brown, then 3 points were assigned. The two scores were multiplied to get the final score of in situ hybridization for each tissue. Finally, the scores less than 4 were judged as low expression of AFAP1-AS1, while the score greater or equal to 4 was assessed as high expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In situ Hybridization of AFAP1-AS1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In situ hybridization was performed to detect the expression of AFAP1-AS1 in tissue specimens using three 30-nucleotide probes from different regions of AFAP1-AS1. GAPDH was used as a positive control. The probe sequences were as follows.
AFAP1-AS1 probes:
Probe 1: 5′- ATTCCTTTATTTTATGGGATGTTCTGTAGGGAGTT-3′,
Probe 2: 5′-TAGAAATGAGAAAAGAATCACCAAGAGAGTAAGCA -3′,
Probe 3: 5′-CCCTACAGCTAGTTTCCTCTTCATTTATTCATTT-3′
GAPDH probes:
Probe 1: 5′-CCACTTTACCAGAGTTAAAAGCAGCCCTGG-3′
Probe 2: 5′-CAGTAGAGGCAGGGATGATGTTCTGGAGAG-3′
Probe 3: 5′-GTCAGAG GAGACCACCTGGTG CTCAGTGTA-3′
The probes were synthesized and labeled with DIG-dUTP at the 3′ end using a kit from Invitrogen (Shanghai, China) [82 (link)–84 (link)]. The in situ hybridization results were independently scored manually by two pathologists who counted 20 sequential high-power fields judged to be representative of the tumor, while remaining blinded to clinical information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

TUNEL Staining for Detecting Cell Death

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TUNEL staining was carried out as described [57 (link)]. Morpholinos-injected albinos embryos fixed in MEMFA were rehydrated in PBT and washed in TdT buffer (Invitrogen) for 30 min. End labelling was carried out overnight at room temperature in TdT buffer containing 0.5 μm DIG-dUTP and 150 U/ml TdT (Invitrogen). Embryos were then washed for 2 h at 65°C in PBS/1 mM EDTA. DIG was detected with anti-DIG Fab fragments conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Roche, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; 1:2,000) and the chromogenic reaction performed using BM purple (Roche, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA). Injection of a Morpholino against Sf3b4 was used as a positive control for induction of cell death [27 (link)]. For each MO, a subset of injected embryos injected was processed for in situ hybridization against sox10 as internal control for the effect of the MOs. TUNEL dots were counted in the neural crest region on each side. The neural crest region was defined as the lateral part of the anterior neural fold. Differences between injected and uninjected sides were plotted as well as the frequency distribution of TUNEL dots on the injected side for each condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

LINC01420 Expression in NPC Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In situ hybridization was performed to detect LINC01420 expression in NPC specimens using three nucleotide probes from different LINC01420 regions.
The sequences of LINC01420 ISH probes: Probe-1: 5'-ATTTAAAGAGGGTGGGATTTGGTCAGAAACTCAC-3'; Probe-2: 5'-CAGGACTTGGACCTTCAACACGAAAAATTCAGAAT-3'; Probe-3: 5'-CACTTGAGAAAACCACTGTAGGACAAGAACAACAT-3'. The probes were synthesized and labeled with DIG-dUTP at the 3' and 5' end (Invitrogen, Shanghai, China). In situ hybridization was performed as previously described 12 (link). All sections were independently scored by two pathologists who were blinded to the clinicopathological features and the clinical data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Amplification and Cloning of Target Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Target genes (18S rRNA, U2 snRNA-5S, histone H3, and uncharacterized gene FP-9X) were amplified by PCR using the Emerald PCR master mix (Takara, Japan). The primer sets used are shown in Table 1. PCR was performed in a thermal cycler (WK-0518, Wako, Osaka, Japan) under the following conditions: initial denaturation for 2 min at 98 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min. PCR products were ligated into the pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega, Madison, USA) and 30 ng of the ligation products were used to transform competent cells (JM109, pGMT-T Easy-Vector Systems, Promega). Transformed cells were plated onto Luria broth (LB) plates containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin, 40 μg/ml 5-Bromo-4-Chloro-3-Indolyl-β-D-Galactoside (X-Gal) and 0.05 mmol/L isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). Isolated colonies were screened by FISH. Probes using FISH screening were prepared by random prime labeling with digoxigenin-12-dUTP (DIG-dUTP) or cyanine-3-dUTP (Cy3-dUTP) in accordance with the kit protocol (Invitrogen, Tokyo, Japan). Then, FISH-positive clones were later transferred into 15 ml test tubes containing 1.5 ml of LB/ampicillin medium and grown at 37 °C overnight. Plasmids from the resulting clones were extracted according to the manufacturer’s protocol using a Mini Plus Plasmid DNA Extraction System (Viogene, NACALAI TESQUE, INC., Kyoto, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

TUNEL Staining of Morpholino-Induced Cell Death

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TUNEL staining was carried out as described (Hensey and Gautier, 1998) . Morpholinos-injected albinos embryos fixed in MEMFA were rehydrated in PBT and washed in TdT buffer (Invotrogen) for 30 min. End labeling was carried out overnight at room temperature in TdT buffer containing 0.5 μM DIG-dUTP and 150 U/ml TdT (Invitrogen). Embryos were then washed for 2 hours at 65°C in PBS/1 mM EDTA. DIG was detected with anti-DIG Fab fragments conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Roche, Indianapolis IN; 1:2000) , and the chromogenic reaction performed using BM purple (Roche, Indianapolis). Injection of a Morpholino against Sf3b4 was used as a positive control for induction of cell death (Devotta et al., 2016) . For each MO, a subset of injected embryos injected was processed for in situ hybridization against sox10 as internal control for the effect of the MOs. TUNEL dots were counted in the neural crest region on each side. The neural crest region was defined as the lateral part of the anterior neural fold.
Differences between injected and uninjected sides were plotted as well as the frequency distribution of TUNEL dots on the injected side for each condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!