The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

81 protocols using osteomeasure

1

Histomorphometric Evaluation of Bone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tibial bones were fixed in 4% formalin for 24 h and decalcified in EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich). Serial paraffin sections (2 μm) were stained for tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) using a Leukocyte Acid Phosphatase Kit (Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Osteoclast numbers were quantified using a microscope (Carl Zeiss) equipped with a digital camera and an image analysis system for performing histomorphometry (Osteomeasure; OsteoMetrics). For Calcein labeling, mice were injected with 30 mg/kg body weight of green fluorescent Calcein (Sigma) 11 and 4 days before sacrifice. Undecalcified bones were embedded in methacrylate and 5 mm sections were cut. Unstained sections were used to measure fluorescent Calcein-labeled bone surfaces at a wavelength of 495 nm. Toluidine Blue staining was performed for quantification of osteoblasts and von Kossa staining for bone mineralization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Osteoclast Quantification in Mouse Femurs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Femurs from 10-week-old male mice were fixed for 1 week in 10% neutral buffered formalin at 4°C, then decalcified in 14% EDTA (pH 7.2) for at least 2 weeks before embedding in paraffin. Five micrometer thick sections were obtained and stained for TRAP (Kamiya Biomedical Company #KT-008). We analyzed two sections in the sagittal plane from each bone using a 600 μm wide region of interest that begins 200 μm distal to the growth plate. This region of interest encompasses the secondary spongiosa quantified by micro-CT. The number of TRAP+ osteoclasts per bone perimeter and osteoclast surface per bone surface were determined using Osteomeasure (Osteometrics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tibial Bone Histomorphometry in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were injected with calcein (30 mg/kg, i.p.) on the first day of loading and alizarin (30 mg/kg, i.p.) on the last day of loading. The tibiae were embedded, sectioned, and analyzed by dynamic histomorphometry at Pharmatest (Turku, Finland). After dissection and fixation in formalin, the tibiae were dehydrated in increasing series of ethanol concentrations, defatted in xylene, and embedded in methyl methacrylate. Two hundred micrometer transverse sections from ∼37% of the total length of the tibia distally from the proximal articular surface were analyzed. All parameters were assessed using the OsteoMeasure histomorphometry system (OsteoMetrics, Atlanta, GA, USA) following the guidelines of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (44 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bone Histomorphometry Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All BH analyses were performed by the same investigator (C.A.M.) using a microscope (Nikon Labophot II, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a ultraviolet (UV), high-resolution digital color video camera (Olympus DP71, Center Valley, PA, USA. The image analysis system used was OsteoMeasure (OsteoMetrics, Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA). The analysis was carried out at the Pro-Renal Foundation (Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil). Structural (27) . The indices are expressed according to the recommendations by the ASBMR Nomenclature Committee (28) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Bone Formation and Deposition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To detect and quantify bone formation, calcein double labels were assessed in fluorescent light microscopy. The following parameters were evaluated using OsteoMeasure (OsteoMetrics, Atlanta, GA, USA): The mineralizing surface per bone surface (MS/BS,%), representing active mineralization, calculated as percent of bone surface that displays a calcein label; the mineral apposition rate (MAR, µm/d), representing the rate of new bone deposition, calculated as distance between consecutively deposited double labels divided by the time interval between them; and the bone formation rate (BFR, µm3/µm2/y), representing the amount of new bone formed, calculated by multiplying mineralizing surface with the mineral apposition rate.
Osteoblast- and osteoid-related parameters were also quantified using the OsteoMeasure histomorphometry system. The parameters - number of osteoblasts per bone perimeter (N.Ob/B.Pr, 1/mm), osteoblast surface per bone surface (Ob.S/BS, %) as well as osteoid indices, including osteoid surface per bone surface (OS/BS, %) and osteoid thickness (O.Th, µm), were extracted in order to quantify cell based bone deposition activity. In each sample section, eight microscopic fields were evaluated at 20-fold magnification. The cells were counted in Masson-Goldner-stained sections, and osteoid indices where evaluated in von Kossa/van Gieson-stained sections.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Histological Analysis of Bone Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For histological analysis, tibial bones were fixed in Histofix (Roth) for 12h and decalcified in EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich). Serial paraffin sections (2 μm) were stained for H&E and tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) using a Leukocyte Acid Phosphatase Kit (Sigma) according as to the manufacturer’s instructions. Undecalcified bones were embedded in methacrylate and 5µm section were cut. Toluidine blue staining was performed for quantification of osteoblasts. Osteoclast and osteoblast numbers were quantified using a microscope (Nikon) equipped with a digital camera and an image analysis system for performing histomorphometry (Osteomeasure; OsteoMetrics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Bone Histomorphometry of PAR1 KO Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone histomorphometry was performed on mouse femurs and calvariae from WT and PAR1 KO male mice in a blinded, non-biased manner using a computerized semiautomated system (Osteomeasure, OsteoMetrics, Decatur, GA) with light microscopy. Static histomorphometry and quantification of OC were performed on paraffin embedded tissues that were stained for TRAP. OC were identified as multinucleated TRAP-positive cells adjacent to bone. A separate analysis for dynamic histomorphometry was performed on the contralateral femur, embedded in methylmethacrylate. The measurement terminology and units used for histomorphometric analysis were those recommended by the Nomenclature Committee of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (26 ). All measurements in the femoral trabecular bone were confined to the secondary spongiosa and restricted to an area between 200 and 1000 μm distal to the growth plate-metaphyseal junction of the distal femur.
For the analysis of the resorptive activity in calvaria, we measured: eroded surface per bone perimeter, osteoclast number per bone perimeter, osteoclast surface per bone perimeter and periosteum area using a computerized semiautomated system (Osteomeasure).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Micro-CT and Histomorphometric Analysis of Bone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Micro-CT images of the tibias were acquired as described previously [13] (link). Briefly, the tibias were harvested, fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h and stored in 70% ethanol. All quantifications were performed with digital image analysis (OsteoMeasure; Osteometrics, Atlanta, GA). The following parameters were measured: fraction of bone volume of the total sample volume (bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV)), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp).
Histomorphometric analysis was performed on methacrylate-embedded undecalcified plastic sections of bone and were stained using von Kossa’s stain and TRAP stain. To measure bone formation rate (BFR), all mice were injected with calcein green solution (30 mg/kg, Sigma, MO) at 10 days and 2 days prior to harvesting. The tibias were prepared as described above and the measurements were performed using an image analysis system (OsteoMeasure) and the bone formation rate was calculated and the data are shown as µm3/µm2/year.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescence Staining and Histological Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence staining, sections were incubated with anti-HIF-1α antibody (1:50, H1a67, Novus) and anti-B220 antibody (1:100, RA3-6B2, Abcam) followed by incubation with AF488- and AF647-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:200, VECTOR). Fluorescence images were captured by a Zeiss confocal microscope. For histological analysis, serial paraffin sections were stained using an H&E staining kit (Carl Roth), Leukocyte Acid Phosphatase Kit (Sigma) or Toluidine Blue. For histomorphometry evaluation, a Nikon microscope equipped with a histomorphometry analysis system (OsteoMeasure; Osteometrics) was used. All samples were blinded for quantitative analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bone Histomorphometry Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone histomorphometry was performed using a microscope (Nikon) equipped with a digital camera and an image analysis system (OsteoMeasure; OsteoMetrics). The following parameters were measured: total size of the proliferation and specific of the hypertrophic chondrocyte part. Sections were scored by one independent observer (G. Schett) blinded for the specific mouse strain. No samples were excluded from analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!