The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Qiaxtractor

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom

The QIAxtractor is a laboratory equipment designed for the automated extraction and purification of nucleic acids from various sample types. It utilizes a versatile and efficient magnetic bead-based technology to isolate high-quality DNA and RNA. The QIAxtractor automates the entire process, from sample preparation to the final elution of the purified nucleic acids, ensuring consistent and reliable results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

27 protocols using qiaxtractor

1

Streptococcus pyogenes Genome Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Streptococcal DNA was extracted using the QIAxtractor instrument according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) or manually using a phenol-chloroform method (37 (link)). DNA library preparation was conducted according to the Illumina protocol, and sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 with 100-cycle paired-end runs.
Genomes were de novo assembled using Velvet with the pipeline and improvements found at https://github.com/sanger-pathogens/vr-codebase and https://github.com/sanger-pathogens/assembly_improvement (38 (link)). Annotation was performed using Prokka. emm genotypes were determined from the assemblies, and multilocus sequence types (MLSTs) were identified using the MLST database (https://pubmlst.org/spyogenes/) and an in-house script (https://github.com/sanger-pathogens/mlst_check). New MLSTs were submitted to the database (https://pubmlst.org/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Automated DNA Extraction and Microsatellite Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted using the QIAxtractor and QIAcube robots (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were screened at 30 microsatellite markers from Peyran et al. (2020 (link)) and González‐Wangüemert et al. (2014 (link)) following the same genotyping procedure as described in Peyran, Boissin, et al. (2021 (link)). Allele sizes were scored and checked manually using GeneMapper v.5 software (Applied Biosystems). Samples presenting ambiguous peak profiles were re‐amplified, genotyped, and re‐scored, and all peaks that remained unclear were considered as missing data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Automated detection of canine influenza virus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using an automated RNA isolation system (Qiagen Qiaxtractor; Hilden, Germany), viral RNA was extracted from the 200-μl viral transport medium aliquots and eluted in a final volume of 60 μl water. A one-step real-time RT-PCR assay developed by members of or laboratory was performed to identify any CIV-positive clinical samples, as previously described [8 (link)]. Briefly, a 5-μl aliquot of RNA template was mixed with 20 μl of mixture containing iScript One-Step RT-PCR Kit reagents (BioRad; Hercules, CA), 80 nmol of probe, and 200 nmol of forward (5′ GAA CAC CGA TCT TGA GGC ACT C 3′) and 200 nmol of reverse (5′ GGC ATT TTG GAC AAA GCG TCT AC 3′) primers to amplify 144 bp of the conserved influenza A virus matrix gene. Water and viral transport medium were used as negative controls, while the positive control consisted of 10 TCID50 of A/canine/CO/224986/2006 (H3N8). An epMotion Ep5070p (Eppendorf; Hamburg, Germany) automated system was used to load 96-well plates before amplification and detection by Mastercycler Realplex (Eppendorf), using previously described conditions [8 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Rotavirus Genotyping via RT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Viral RNA was extracted using the QIAxtractor (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) platform. Extracted RNA was denatured at 97°C for 5 minutes and reverse transcription-PCR was performed using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with random hexamers (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Norway) by following a single thermal cycle of 25°C for 5 minutes, 37°C for 60 minutes and 95°C for 5 minutes [24 (link)].
5μl of the cDNA was used for G-typing and P-typing PCR reactions of each specimen, following previously established procedures for eight G (1–4, 8–10, 12) types and six P (4, 6, 8–11) types rotavirus strains [25 (link)–26 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Viral Load in Guinea Pigs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood and tissues (lung, liver, and spleen) were collected from euthanized guinea pigs to determine the viral load. For tissue DNA extraction, FastPrep 24 (MP Biomedical) was used to homogenize tissues as a 20% weight/volume homogenate in LysingMatrix D (MP Biomedicals). To obtain DNA from whole blood, 500ul of blood was collected (by toe nail clip bleed) into tubes containing ACD anticoagulant and 200μl of blood was subsequently used per extraction. DNA was extracted using the QIAxtractor (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s liquid (blood) or tissue protocol instructions. Viral load was determined by real time PCR on Lightcycler 480 (Roche Applied Science) as previously described in (67 (link)). Viral load was expressed as copy number/ml of blood or copy number/mg tissue. Results calculated were a mean value of triplicate PCR runs per sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genome Sequencing Using Illumina HiSeq

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted using a QIAxtractor (Qiagen), and library preparation was performed according to the Illumina protocol. Index-tagged libraries were created, and 96 isolates multiplexed per lane and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform (Illumina) to generate 100-bp paired-end reads. The average sequencing depth was 77-fold, with a minimum of 48-fold.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

DNA Extraction from Swab Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each swab was suspended in 400 µl sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) after thawing at room temperature. DNA was extracted from the swab/PBS suspension using an adapted whole blood protocol on the QIAxtractor (Qiagen, Crawley, UK) automated instrument and eluted into a final volume of 50 µl DX Elution Buffer (Qiagen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genomic Analysis of E. coli Bloodstream Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted using the QIAxtractor (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Library preparation was conducted according to the Illumina protocol and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with 100-cycle paired-end runs. Sequence data were retrieved for a further 1,517 open access E. coli isolates associated with bloodstream infections (17 (link), 18 (link)). Of these, 424 were isolated between January 2006 and December 2012 at the Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and 1,093 were submitted to the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Bacteraemia Resistance Surveillance Project by 11 UK hospitals between 2001 and 2011 (for details, see www. bsacsurv.org and Table S1 in the supplemental material) (31 (link)). Previous description and analysis of these genomes (17 (link), 18 (link)) did not include comparisons with isolates from livestock or meat.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Bacterial Genome Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction was performed with the QIAxtractor (Qiagen) instrument according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Illumina sequencing libraries with a 450-bp insert size were prepared according to the manufacturer’s protocols and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2000 with paired-end reads with a length of 100 bp. Ninety-six samples were multiplexed per lane to give an average depth of coverage of ~90-fold. We assembled paired-end sequence reads by employing an assembly and improvement pipeline (51 ) that is based on Velvet (52 (link)) and subsequently annotated the de novo assemblies with Prokka (53 (link)). To perform the pangenome analysis, we took the output from Prokka and analyzed it with Roary (54 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Plaque Purification and Amplification of Co-Infecting Viruses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each tracheal swab obtained from the in vivo co-infection study was serially diluted (ten-fold) in growth media and used to inoculate sub-confluent (80–90% confluency) LMH monolayers in 6-well plates. After 1 hour of adsorption at 37°C, the monolayer was covered with methyl-cellulose overlay media (1% w/v methyl-cellulose in DMEM, with 10% FBS, 50 μg/mL ampicillin, 50 μg/mL gentamicin) and incubated at 37°C. After 24 to 48 hours of incubation, 20 isolated plaques from each swab sample were carefully picked using a micropipette and an inverted light microscope. Then each plaque was individually propagated by inoculating of LMH monolayers grown in 12-well plates. Three plaque picking purification rounds, with one freeze/thaw cycle in-between each round, was performed before a final amplification in one well of a 6-well plate. Nucleic acid was extracted from 200 μL of plaque-purified virus using the automated QIAxtractor (Qiagen) system and Vx reagents (Qiagen). DNA was eluted in 100 μL of elution buffer. In order to control for any recombination that could occur in vitro during the process of inoculation and plaque purification, pure CSW-1 and V1-99 stocks were mixed and immediately used to co-inoculate additional cultures of LMH cells using 1:1 ratio of 1×104 PFU of each virus. Isolated plaques were then picked and processed as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!