The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss software package version 25

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS software package version 25.0 is a statistical analysis tool designed to help users explore data, model relationships, and make predictions. It provides a comprehensive set of features for data management, analysis, and reporting.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

32 protocols using spss software package version 25

1

Comparative Analysis of Solubilization and Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mean comparison of solubilization index, pH of culture media, soluble P and K, germination, seedling growth parameters and the P and K content were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) by using SPSS software Package Version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., USA). The difference between treatments was compared by the least significant difference (LSD) test at P<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multivariate Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The results reported are the means of six replicates (expressed as the mean ± standard error). The data from various treatments were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) by using SPSS software package version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Levels for significant differences were set at p < 0.05. PCA and correlation analysis were performed using OriginPro 2021 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mosquito Density and Exophily Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using SPSS software package version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The mean mosquito density between indoor and outdoor collection was computed using student t-test. Test of significance was estimated assuming α (two sided) = 0.05 and P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant during the analysis. Mean variation of mosquito densities among different species, sites and months were tested using one way ANOVA. Zero inflated data were log transformed before undertaking the planned analysis in order to fit in to the normal distribution model. Frequency distribution of species composition was determined by excel spreadsheet. Absolute mosquitoes’ numbers were converted to capture rate. The exophilic behavior of mosquitoes collected by PSC was determined using the formula developed by Ameneshewa and Service (1993) . Thus, Degree of exophily (DE) was calculated as DE=1(1/(FHGG))100 where, F is the number of fed mosquitoes and HGG is the sum of the gravid and half-gravid mosquitoes collected by PSCs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analysis of Pediatric Height and Weight

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At this stage, the height and weight status data as well as children’s demographic data were entered into SPSS software package version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) to analyze statistically, and then the report of results was written.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Hydrolase Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the significance of the differences between HI of the HPB on screening plates and the degree of synergism between HPB, two-tailed, unpaired t-tests were performed at a confidence level of P < 0.05. The differences between treatments on hydrolase activity between HPB and the nutrient analysis of FW were assessed through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the calculated means were subjected to the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at P < 0.05. Pearson correlation was conducted to quantify correlation coefficients between HI and hydrolase activity, and GBP and temperature dynamic at P < 0.01 confidence interval. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software Package Version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Quantitative Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For statistical analysis, the SPSS software package version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used. The acceptable error threshold was p = 0.05. The normality of the quantitative data was verified with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. In order to describe the continuous quantitative data with normal distribution, the arithmetic mean and the standard deviation (SD) were used, or median, first quartile (q1) and third quartile (q3) for data with distribution. Qualitative data were described using absolute and relative frequencies. Student’s t test for independent samples was used to verify the significant difference between means for quantitative data with normal distribution and a non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test, where necessary. A chi-square test was used to check the association between qualitative data and to quantify the effective size of association, a 95% confidence interval (CI) for OR was calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Radiographic Outcomes of Precontoured LCP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metric data is presented as mean values and standard deviation. The minimum level of significance was set at P ≤ .05. The mean RRS value approximately 12 months postoperatively was set as primary outcome parameter.18 (link),19 (link) Previous examinations showed mean RRS values of 8.2 ± 1.2 for precontoured LCP and 6.3 ± 1.7 for conventional implants after 66.1 and 62.3 weeks in age-pooled cohorts.17 (link)
Based on a probability of less than 5% for type I error and a power of 80%, the sample size was calculated to be 13 per group. Intra- and interrater reliability of the Rasmussen Radiological Score was analyzed in a subset of 15 consecutive cases based on 2 different runs with an interval of 3 months and 2 different raters (WCP and JF). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated based on two-way-mixed effects. Further statistical analyses were performed using parametric and nonparametric tests. The Mann–Whitney U Test and the Student’s t-test were used for interval and ratio scaled data. For nominal or ordinal categories, the χ2 test or the Fisher’s exact test in case of singular low frequencies were applied. Statistical analysis was conducted with the SPSS software package version 25.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Analysis of Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software package version 25.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Differences between means were calculated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired samples t-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Categorical and Continuous Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For statistical analysis, proportion was used as a descriptive statistic for categorical and ordinal variables, the median and interquartile range for ordinal and continuous variables and the mean for continuous variables. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square or Fisher's test for the categorical variables and the Student T-test for analysis of differences in average values. A p value \ 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical calculations were performed with SPSS software package version 25.0 (Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analysis of Solubilization and Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mean comparison of solubilization index, pH of culture media, soluble P and K, germination, seedling growth parameters and the P and K content were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) by using SPSS software Package Version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., USA).
Difference between treatments was compared by least significant difference (LSD) test at P<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!