The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Chicken ovalbumin ova

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

Chicken ovalbumin (OVA) is a laboratory-grade protein derived from egg whites. It is a widely used standard and control substance in various biochemical and immunological assays. The core function of OVA is to serve as a reference material for quantification, standardization, and quality control purposes in research and diagnostic applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using chicken ovalbumin ova

1

Optimizing In Vivo Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GR was obtained from Korea Ginseng Corporation (Seoul, Republic of Korea) and GB was provided from R&D Center, Amorepacific Corporation as described previously (Gyeongi-do, Republic of Korea) [15 (link)]. Chicken ovalbumin (OVA) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The endotoxin levels contained in the amount of GR and GB (50 mg/kg) and OVA (50 μg) used in each in vivo experiment were evaluated using a Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay kit (Lonza) and were less than 0.1 endotoxin unit/ml.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunophenotyping of Dendritic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chicken ovalbumin (OVA) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Mouse fluorescein-conjugated antibodies against CD11c, I-Ab, CD80, CD86, CD40, and FcγRIIB were purchased from eBioscience. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for the detection of mouse interleukin (IL)-12, IL-6, IL-4, and IL-13 as well as an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit for evaluation of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) were bought from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA).Rabbit anti-mouse Cox-2 and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit Ig secondary antibodies were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification and Endotoxin Removal of G. formosanum Polysaccharide

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The major polysaccharide fraction PS-F2 was purified from the submerged culture of G. formosanum Chang et Chen (ATCC 76538) as previously described (Wang et al. 2011 (link)). The purified PS-F2 was passed through an endotoxin removal column (Detoxi-Gel Endotoxin Removing Gel, Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) and the endotoxin level in the samples was determined to be < 0.3 EU/mg by the Pyrotell Limulus Amebocytes Lysate (LAL) test (Associates of Cape Cod, Falmouth, MA). Chicken ovalbumin (OVA) and pentobarbital sodium were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) and passed though the Detoxi-Gel Endotoxin Removing Gel before use. Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS) was purchased from Thermo Scientific HyClone (Logan, UT). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Biological Industries (Beit-Haemek, Israel). Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline (DPBS) was purchased from Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD). All other chemicals were purchased from commercial sources at the highest purity available.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Induction of Allergic Airway Inflammation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We followed our previously established protocol to induce acute allergic airway inflammation with OVA with minor changes [15 (link)]. Briefly, mice were sensitized to 8 μg chicken ovalbumin (OVA; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) bound to 4 mg aluminium hydroxide (Sigma-Aldrich) in phosphate-buffered saline intraperitoneally (i.p.) at day 1 and 6. On days 14–18, the mice were challenged once a day intranasally (i.n.) with 100 μg OVA in 25 μL PBS to induce allergic airway inflammation (12 OVA/OVA mice). The control group was exposed to PBS only during these 5 days (10 OVA/PBS mice).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Tracking T Cell Responses with Radiolabeled Antibodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Singe cell suspensions of CD4+ T cells (from OT-II donor mice) and CD8+ T cells (from OT-I donor mice) were prepared from spleen and lymph nodes using the naive CD4+ isolation kit and the CD8a+ isolation kit, respectively, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Miltenyi Biotec). The purity of the isolated cells was >95 % as determined by cytofluorimetry. Pooled cells were washed and resuspended in PBS, followed by retro-orbital injection of 2 x 106 CD4+ and/or CD8a+ cells into RAG1−/− recipients. On day 1 after cell transfer, mice received 100 μg of chicken ovalbumin (OVA) (Sigma-Aldrich), emulsified in complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) (1:1 ratio), by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection in the scruff of the neck. Immunized mice received 50 μCi (1850 kBq) radiolabeled anti-CD4 scFv or anti-CD8 VHH by retro-orbital injection on day 4 and 11. PET-CT images were then acquired on days 5 and 12 (Fig. 3A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!