The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Polyvinylidene fluoride microporous membrane

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) microporous membrane is a laboratory equipment product. It is a thin, porous membrane made from PVDF material. The primary function of this membrane is to allow the passage of certain molecules or particles while retaining others, depending on the pore size and other properties of the membrane.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using polyvinylidene fluoride microporous membrane

1

Protein Expression Analysis via SDS-PAGE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were treated as indicated and then lysed using RIPA (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). Protein concentration was quantified with the Bicinchoninic Acid Kit (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Equal amounts of protein (30 µg) were resolved on SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride microporous membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and probed with primary antibodies for β-actin (4970S, Cell Signaling Technology, CST, Boston, MA, USA), CXCL1(AF5403, Affinity Biosciences, Cincinnati, OH, USA), and β-catenin (51067-2-AP, Proteintech, Chicago, USA). The relative expression levels of proteins between groups were calculated by comparing optical densities of bands using the Gel-Pro analyzer four software (Media Cybernetics, Maryland, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Expression Analysis by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-cell lysates were prepared with RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitor (Sigma) and phosphatase inhibitor (Roche Applied Science) cocktail tablets and the protein concentration were determined by Bio-Rad Protein assay (Bio-Rad). Equivalent amounts of protein were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride microporous membrane (Millipore), blocked with 1.5% BSA in H20 containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T), and membranes were probed with the following primary antibodies: anti-LIG1 (Abcam ab177946) (1:1,000), anti-FXR1 (Abcam ab155124) (1:1,000), and anti-GAPDH (Thermo Scientific MA5-15738) (1:3,000). Secondary antibodies were conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and peroxidase activity was visualized using Chemiluminescent HRP substrate (Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Influenza A Virus Infection Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDCK cells were seeded on a 24-well plate at a density of 1 × 105 cells/well. 25 (12.5 μM), 1 (12.5 μM, positive control), or DMSO (0.125%, negative control) were mixed with MOI 0.1 of A/PR/8/34 virus and incubated for 30 min prior to the cells being added. At 4, 8, 12, or 24 h post-infection, the cells were lysed in a buffer containing 125 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 5% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 25% glycerol, 0.1% bromophenol blue, and 10% β-mercaptoethanol and boiled for 5 min. The cell lysates were separated on a 10% polyacrylamide gel. The proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride microporous membrane (Millipore, MA, USA). FluA-NP 4F1 (SouthernBiotech) or a goat anti-influenza A viral NS1 antibody (vC-20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA) were used as primary antibodies to detect their respective proteins. A rabbit anti-β-ACTIN antibody (13E5; Cell Signaling, MA, USA) was used as an internal control. The secondary antibodies, horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (SouthernBiotech) or donkey anti-goat IgG (sc-2020; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), were used as appropriate. The signals were detected using Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Millipore). Signal intensities were measured using ImageJ software, and the protein levels of NP and NS1 were normalized to that of β-actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Molecular Profiling of Heart Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The heart tissues were quickly collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen for further research. Then, heart tissues were lysed in ice-cold RIPA buffer with a 1% protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail. The protein concentration in the lysis buffer was determined by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay reagent kit (Thermo Scientific, United States), and 20 μg proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (8% or 10%) and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride microporous membrane (Millipore, Burlington, MA). Subsequently, membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk or 1% BSA and incubated with specific primary antibodies for toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) (Abcam, rabbit Ab, 1:300), interleukin receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK1) (Abcam, rabbit Ab, 1:1,000), tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) (Santa Cruz, mouse Ab, 1:500), nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) (Cell Signaling Technology, rabbit mAb, 1:1,000), type I collagen (collagen I) (Bioss, rabbit Ab, 1:1,000), β-actin (Proteintech, mouse Ab, 1:4,000–5,000) at 4°C overnight and followed by incubation with appropriate peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. ImageJ software (NIH) was used for quantitative analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein samples for western blot analysis were prepared as described previously [22] (link). Briefly, MSCs (passages 3–5) were washed three times with ice-cold PBS and then treated with lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 2% SDS (Sigma-Aldrich) and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Samples were centrifuged for 1 h at 18,000× g at 4°C. The supernatants were collected as whole cell lysates. Protein concentrations were estimated using a DC protein assay (Bio-Rad) with a bovine serum albumin standard. Equal amounts of proteins (10 µg) were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on 4–20% acrylamide gradient gels (Bio-Rad) and then transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride microporous membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA). The membranes were blocked with a blocking reagent (Toyobo, Tokyo, Japan) and then incubated with each primary antibody. The primary antibodies used were: rabbit anti-PCAF, rabbit anti-HIF-1α (Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-VEGF (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and rabbit anti-β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology). After washing, the membranes were incubated with a peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) and visualized using Immunostar LD (Wako). Images were captured digitally using a ChemiDoc XRS+ (Bio-Rad) and analyzed by Image Lab 2.0.1 software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Expression Analysis by Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were separated by 10% SDS-containing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride microporous membrane (Millipore, MA, USA). The membrane was probed with primary antibodies including HAb18, C-19 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-MMP-2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-p-ERK1/2, anti-p-FAK, anti-p-Akt, anti-p-EGFR, anti-ERK1/2, anti-Akt, anti-EGFR (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA), anti-FAK (BD), and anti-α-tubulin antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of DNA Repair Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell lysates were prepared with RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich) and phosphatase inhibitor (Roche Applied Science) cocktail tablets, and the protein concentration were determined by Bio-Rad Protein assay (Bio-Rad). Equivalent amounts of protein were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride microporous membrane (Millipore), blocked with 5% skim milk in TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20, and membranes were probed with the following antibodies: BLM (rabbit; ab2179; Abcam), FANCM (rabbit; ab95014; Abcam), GAPDH (mouse; MA5-15738; Thermo Fisher Scientific), FANCD2 (rabbit; NB100-182SS; Novus), RECQL5 (rabbit; A302-520A-T; Bethyl), WRN (rabbit; A300-238A-T; Bethyl), TOP3A (rabbit; 14525–1-AP; Proteintech), and α-tubulin (mouse; 32-2500; Life Technologies). Secondary antibodies were conjugated to HRP, and peroxidase activity was visualized using Chemiluminescent HRP substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Protein Signaling Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell pellets were solubilized in electrophoresis sample buffer, sonicated for 10 s, and boiled for 10 min. The protein concentration of cell lysates was measured, and 3 mg protein was separated by SDS-PAGE, and then transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride microporous membrane (MILLI-PORE, Billerica, MA). Membranes were blocked in PBS with 5% milk powder and probed with anti-AKT (ab81283, ABcam, USA), anti-ERK (ab54230, ABcam, USA), anti-β-actin (ab11003, ABcam, USA), anti-RHOC (ab64659, ABcam, USA), anti-p-ERK (ab201015, ABcam, USA), ani-p-AKT (ab38449, ABcam, USA), at 4 °C overnight. After washing, the membrane was cultured with HRP-linked goat anti-rabbit Ab (Cell Signaling Technology). Blots were visualized by ECL (ECL Plus; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden), on the basis of the manufacturer protocol. Results were captured digitally using a LAS1000 Lumino Image Analyzer (Fuji Photo Film, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed with RIPA buffer (Nacalai Tesque) supplemented with 0.1% bromophenol blue and 10% β-mercaptoethanol and denatured for 5 min. Cell lysates were then loaded onto a 6–10% polyacrylamide gel and subjected to SDS–PAGE. The separated proteins were transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride microporous membrane (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), and the membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk in tris-buffered saline with Tween 20. Respective primary and secondary antibodies (Supplementary Table S3) were used to detect specific proteins. The signals were detected using Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent Horseradish Peroxidase Substrate (Millipore). Signal intensities were measured using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), and target protein levels were normalized to that of β-ACTIN and relative protein levels were calculated. Uncropped images of the western blotting membranes are shown in Supplementary Figures S10S14.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunoblotting of Epithelial Monolayers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDCK II cells were seeded in poly-L-lysine-coated 24-well plates at a density of 2.1 × 105 cells per well. The cells were cultured for 3 days, and the medium was changed every day to establish monolayer integrity. After specific treatments, monolayers were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed with lysis buffer. After sonication, the cell extracts were boiled at 60 °C for 10 min, separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride microporous membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA), blocked with 5% skimmed milk (Megmilk Snowbrand, Sapporo, Japan) or setsuyakukun supporter (#DRC-BS500CH, DRC, Tokyo), probed with the appropriate primary antibody and HRP-conjugated anti-IgG secondary antibody, and detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (#07880-70, Nakalai Tesque). Images were visualized using X-ray film (RU-X, Fuji film) for Figs 4A and 5E, and using Sayaka Imager (DRC, Tokyo) for Fig. 6E. The band intensities of phospho-cofilin, occludin and actin were measured with Image J and normalized by actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!