The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ge idxa

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

The GE iDXA is a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) system designed for body composition analysis. It measures bone mineral density, bone mineral content, and soft tissue composition, including fat and lean mass.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using ge idxa

1

Body Composition Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall-mounted stadiometer (SECA, Chino, CA). Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a digital scale (Tanita, Arlington Heights, Illinois). GE iDXA (GE, Fairfield, CT) was used to assess fat-free mass, fat mass, lean mass, percent body fat, and visceral adipose tissue [15 (link)–17 (link)]. Visceral fat was calculated using the CoreScan application of the GE iDXA [18 (link), 19 (link)]. Calibration of the DXA scan took place at the beginning of each testing day using a manufacturer-provided calibration block. Scans were analyzed using Encore software version 17.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Body Composition Assessment via DXA Scan

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body weight and height were measured for all participants at the beginning of each session. Weight was measured using a digital scale (Seca, Hamburg, Germany) accurate to ±0.1 kg with participants dressed in athletic shorts and a t-shirt. Height was measured by a stadiometer accurate to ±0.1 cm (Seca, Hamburg, Germany). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (in kilograms) divided by the square of height (in meters). A GE iDXA (GE, Fairfield, CT, USA) was used to assess fat-free mass, fat mass, lean mass, percent body fat, and visceral adipose tissue [32 (link),33 ,34 (link)]. Visceral fat was calculated using the CoreScan application of the GE iDXA [35 (link),36 (link)]. Calibration of the DXA scan took place at the beginning of each testing day using a manufacturer-provided calibration block. Scans were analyzed using Encore software version 17.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Effect of Overweight on Body Composition in Healthy Women

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Healthy women with overweight or obesity were recruited according to the following inclusion criteria: 18–40 years of age, BMI 27–38 kg/m2, fasting plasma glucose ≤110 mg/dL, blood pressure ≤140/90 mmHg, absence of major organ disease, normal screening urinary and blood laboratory tests, weight stable for ≥3 months, and no significant changes in diet or physical activity in the previous month. Exclusion criteria consisted of a history of diagnosed diabetes, chronic use of medications with potential metabolic effects (glucocorticoids, adrenergic agents, or thiazolidinediones), or use of medications or procedures that cause weight gain or loss. Subjects with HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C were excluded, as were pregnant or breastfeeding women. The institutional review board of Pennington Biomedical Research Center approved all procedures, and all subjects gave written informed consent.
Anthropometric characteristics (height, weight, and waist-to-hip ratio [WHR]) were taken at the beginning of the study. Following the 8-week labeling period, anthropometric measures were repeated, body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using the whole-body scanner GE iDXA, and AT samples were collected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Assessing Obesity with DEXA Scans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants reported to the CRF at ∼0800 h, following a 10-hour overnight fast. Following assessment of height and weight, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scanning (GE iDXA; GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) was used to determine whole-body and regional fat mass, lean mass, and visceral adipose tissue (VAT). VAT was obtained by identifying the android/gynoid region and the horizontal plane by the area between the pelvis and the rib cage, with its vertical limits being the inner abdominal muscle wall. VAT is computed by subtracting subcutaneous fat from the total android fat mass in the android region. Obesity was defined by body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg ⋅ m2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Anthropometric Measurements and Body Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A tape measure was used to obtain waist circumference measured at the midpoint between the lower margin of the last palpable rib and the top of the iliac crest. Hip circumference was measured, around the widest portion of the buttocks, with the tape parallel to the floor, to determine waist-hip ratio. BMI in kg/m2 was calculated from height and weight measurements obtained using a medical scale (Detecto® 437, Webb City, MO). Total lean mass, fat mass, and percent body fat were measured from a whole-body scan using Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA, GE iDXA, Fairfield, Connecticut).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Body Composition Changes in Weight Loss

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Weight loss was accessed in 5 intervals: 1: pre-surgery to baseline, 2: first half of intervention: baseline intervention to mid-intervention, 3: Second half of intervention: mid intervention to post intervention, 4: Intervention = baseline to post intervention, 5: Total: pre-surgery to post intervention. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated.
Body composition was assessed at pre and post intervention in both groups. Briefly, whole body fat mas (FM) and fat free mass (FFM) were determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) utilizing a GE iDXA (GE Healthcare). Total (AAT), superficial (SSAT), deep (SDAT), visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous (SAT) abdominal adipose tissue were quantified by computed tomography (CT) using SliceOmatic image analysis software (TomoVision, Montreal, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Clinical Measurements and Body Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All participants arrived at the National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Clinical Research Facility (CRF) in the afternoon having eaten lunch. On arrival and after the consent process, the participants underwent clinical measurements including blood pressure, temperature, and electrocardiogram. Height was measured on a stadiometer and recorded to the nearest millimeter (SECA electronic stadiometer) and weight was measured on electronic scales to the nearest gram (Kern & Sohn GmbH).
The participants then completed a whole body DXA assessment for bone mass (BM) and body composition [FM and lean soft tissue (LST)] (GE iDXA, analyzed in version 16, enhanced mode).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Pediatric Anthropometric Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A pediatrician completed a medical history and physical examination on each participant. Tanner staging was determined by examination of pubic hair as well as external genitalia in males and breast in females according to the published reports of Marshall and Tanner (15 (link), 16 (link)). Measures of height and weight were used to calculate BMI, which was expressed as a percentile using normative data for the child’s age and sex from the United States Centers for Disease Control. Blood pressure was measured using an appropriate sized cuff. Body composition was quantified using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (GE iDXA, Fairfield, CT, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Anthropometric Measurements and Body Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body mass and height were assessed at the beginning of each condition. Participants were assessed with their shoes removed and wearing a t-shirt and athletic shorts. Body mass was assessed using a digital scale accurate to ±0.1 kg (Seca, Hamburg, Germany). Height was assessed using a stadiometer (Seca, Hamburg, Germany) accurate to ±0.1 cm. Body composition was assessed on the initial visit using a GE iDXA (GE, Fairfield, CT, USA) [28 (link)]. The DXA was calibrated at the beginning of each assessment day per the manufacturer’s instructions. Encore version 17 was used to analyze the scans.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan was completed with a GE iDXA whole-body scanner (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) to measure total fat mass and % fat mass. Bone mineral density (BMD; g/cm2) was also calculated for the whole body and by region (trunk, spine, leg). The scans were analyzed with Encore V.13.60.033. All females (n= 21) completed a urine pregnancy test prior to the DXA scan.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!