The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sas university edition v 9

Manufactured by SAS Institute

SAS University Edition v.9.4 is a free software package that provides access to the SAS programming language and analytical capabilities. It is designed for educational and personal use, and can be used to learn and experiment with SAS on a personal computer.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

3 protocols using sas university edition v 9

1

Examining Patient Outcomes in Overdose

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics examining patient demographics and clinical characteristics were tabulated. Two sample t-tests (for normally distributed variables) and chi-squared tests (for categorical variables) were employed to compare demographic and clinical characteristics between groups. Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables, t-tests for normally distributed continuous variables, and Mann-Whitney-U tests for non-normally distributed continuous variables were used to analyze differences in outcomes between groups.
We subsequently fit multivariable models to adjust for demographic and clinical confounding variables. We employed a linear regression model for continuous outcomes (total naloxone dose), logistic regression models for binary outcomes (death, cardiac arrest, ICU admission), and Poisson regression models for count variables (hospital length of stay).
Relevant demographic and clinical covariates including age, sex, race, ethnicity, prior psychiatric history, and clinical site were selected a priori for inclusion in the multivariable models. Analyses were conducted using SAS University Edition v.9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and SPSS v. 24 (IBM, Armonk, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Fly Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical differences among the indicated groups of flies were tested using one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test, as indicated in the figure legends, except for differences in Twinkle and tamas transcript levels, for which Student t-tests were applied. The analyses were performed using the software SAS University Edition v9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fungicide Effects on Wheat Quality Traits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data analyses were done in SAS ® University Edition v9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). The treatment effects on each of the quality properties (TGW, TW, GPC and ZSV) at each location and year were subject to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using general linear modelling (PROC GLM procedure). Grain quality parameters were considered dependant variables, and year and fungicide treatment were independent variables. A Tukey's HSD post hoc means sepa-Fig. 1. Mean severity of Septoria leaf blotch (SLB), wheat leaf rust (WLR) and wheat powdery mildew (WPM) between GS 77 and GS 87 (Zadoks et al., 1974) at the experimental sites in Luxembourg during 2006-2009. Disease severities are presented for the single (1T), double (2T) and triple (3T) fungicide-treated and control (0T) plots (no fungicide spray applied). The mean value was calculated on the two upper leaves L1 and L2, L1 being the flag leaf. Luxembourg was exposed to a Fusarium head blight (FHB) outbreak in 2007: Burmerange showed a 0.5% incidence with a 62% severity while Everlange showed negligible incidence (Giraud et al., 2010) . ration test (˛ = 0.05) was used to compare the means. Any pairwise P-values < 0.05 (2-sided) were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!