The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss statistical software for windows version 13

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS is a statistical software package for Windows, version 13.0. It provides tools for data analysis, data management, and data documentation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

10 protocols using spss statistical software for windows version 13

1

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software for Windows (version13; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences between different groups were assessed using Student's t-test or one-way ANOVA. The data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation. Differences were considered to be significant at P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Angiogenesis Grading

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All values are expressed as the mean ± SD, number, or percentage where appropriate. Differences in continuous variables between two groups were analyzed by the independent t-test. The means of more than three independent groups were analyzed by ANOVA. Continuous variables were compared with a paired t-test for matched-paired samples. The Pearson correlation test was used to assess the relation between two quantitative variables. A binary logistic regression model was further used to evaluate the major factors related to angiogenesis grading. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software for Windows version 13 (SPSS for Windows, version 13; SPSS, Chicago, IL). A value of p less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mortality Risk Factors Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Categorical data were analyzed by χ2 test. Continuous variables among three groups were compared using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison procedure. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and was utilized to determine correlations between independent parameters and 30-day mortality. Hazard ratio (HR) for long-term mortality was assessed using multiple Cox-regression analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software for Windows version 13 (SPSS for Windows, version 17; SPSS, IL, U.S.A.). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Intraocular Pressure Comparison Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A sample size of at least 30 eyes in each group was estimated to produce a 90% power of detection with at least a difference of 2 mm Hg between groups, with a standard deviation of 3.5 mm Hg for significance at a 2-sided level of 5%. Data were analyzed by intention to treat. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient demographics and baseline ocular characteristics. Skewness and kurtosis measures were used to test for normality. Paired and independent t tests were used to evaluate within group and between group mean differences, respectively. The analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software for Windows, version 13 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Newman-Keuls post hoc test using SPSS statistical software for Windows, version 13.0 (SPSS, Inc.), and GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.) was used to draw statistical charts. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM from a minimum of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Differences with P<0.05 were considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Analysis of Experimental Treatments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Values are means ± standard deviations or numbers (percentages). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software for Windows Version 13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Quantitative parametric data were compared between groups using the t test, and nonparametric data were compared using the Mann–Whitney test. Qualitative data were compared using the chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. A P value of 0.05 or less was considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software for Windows, version 13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The comparisons of cell viability, colony formation efficiency, and xenograft tumor size between different treatment groups were calculated using t-tests. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method with a log rank test. The multivariate Cox regression method was used to analyze the effects of FASN / FZD10 expression on overall survival (OS, in months), which was defined as the time from diagnosis to the date of last contact or death. The comparison of 30- or 60-month survival rates between different subpopulations were performed using a Z-test. For all tests, a value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Predictive Factors for Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), median (1st quantile, 3rd quantile), or number (percentage), as appropriate. For all analytic results, a p-value of 0.05 is considered statistically significant. We adopted the independent t and Mann-Whitney U test to identify the difference between the two groups for continuous variables according to the normality test. For independent variables, Pearson chi-square test was applied to compare the proportion between both groups. We used the ROC curve to analyze the optimal cut-off point of a variable with Youden’s index criterion. To compare the odds ratio of significant variables, we selected the candidate variables using univariate logistic regression with a p-value of 0.05 and the final model using multivariate logistic regression. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software for Windows version 13.0 (SPSS for Windows, version 13; SPSS, Chicago, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Inflammatory Markers in Clinical Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All numerical data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, all experiments were repeated three times. Statistical differences between clinical variables and inflammatory scores were evaluated using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the non-parametric Spearman correlation test for continuous variables. One-way analysis of variance was used to assess the significance of differences among experimental groups and controls. Multiple comparisons was performed using Fisher's least significant difference test. The results were analyzed using SPSS statistical software for Windows, version 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Glioma Subgroups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The differences between the nontumor group and the glioma subgroups were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Correlations were analyzed by the Pearson’s correlation test. The in vitro experiments were repeated at least 3 times, the data are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M., and comparisons between 2 groups were performed using Student’s t-test. Animal survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, which was followed by the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software for Windows, version 13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Tests were 2-tailed, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!