The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

429 protocols using d8 advance diffractometer

1

In-situ XRD Analysis of Electrochemical Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD patterns were collected on a Bruker D8-Advance diffractometer equipped with Cu Kα radiation source. Additional synchrotron XRD patterns were collected on powders put in sealed glass capillaries (diameter 0.7 mm) either at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility on ID22 with λ=0.3543 Å (Fig. 3a,c) or at 11BM-Argonne National Lab with λ=0.4142 Å (Fig. 3b). The in situ XRD patterns were recorded using electrochemical cells, assembled similarly to our Swagelok cell, but equipped with a beryllium window as current collector on the positive side. These cells were placed on the Bruker D8-Advance diffractometer (Cu Kα radiation) and connected to the VMP2 system. All patterns were analysed using the Rietveld method as implemented in the FullProf program29 . Phase quantification was performed on the in situ patterns by applying a overall correction on the patterns to account for the absorption from the Be window.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Structural Characterization of Miscanthus Fibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Structural characterizations of Miscanthus fibers and PHBHV/MIS composites with and without DCP were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a D8 advance Bruker diffractometer (Bruker, Wissenbourg, France) operating at 40 kV and 40 mA with a CuKα radiation. The whole area investigated was in the range 2θ ≈ 5–40° at a scanning rate of 0.2°/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Thermal Analysis, XRD, and FTIR Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thermal analysis measurements were performed with a Perkin Elmer Diamond DSC device (Waltham, MA, USA) with a heating/cooling rate of 1 K min−1 on a temperature interval between 293 K and 550 K. The measurements were made in an inert gas atmosphere, argon, at a flow rate of 20 mL min−1. The instrument has been calibrated for specific parameters, temperature, and enthalpy using high purity indium (ΔfusH = 28.54 J g−1). All samples’ masses were between 7 and 10 mg and were weighed with the Partner XA balance (Radwag, Radom, Poland) with a precision of 10 μg.
The XRD measurements for the crystalline structure of the samples were studied by X-Ray Diffraction using a D8 Advance Bruker diffractometer (Cu Kα radiation λ = 1.5418 Å, 40 kV, 40 mA, Bragg-Bretano geometry, Karlsruhe, Germany) at a scanning speed of 0.10 degrees/min in the 10–40 degrees 2Θ range. Crystallite size was estimated with Scherrer equation.
All the FTIR measurements were performed on a Perkin Elmer Spectrum Two ATR-FTIR (Waltham, MA, USA) with a data acquisition count set to 100. The spectrometer was equipped with an universal attenuated total reflection (UATR) accessory containing a diamond/ZnSe crystal for 1 reflection analysis. FT-IR spectra were recorded at a 4 cm−1 spectral resolution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

X-Ray Diffraction Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The diffraction spectra were collected at room temperature on a D8 advance Bruker diffractometer with a monochromatic Cu Kα source (wavelength 1.5418 Å); a 1 mm divergent slit and a 3 mm anti-scattering slit were used. The 2θ scans were performed from 2 to 80° with a step size of 0.02° and a counting time of 1.00 s per step.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of MgAl2O4 Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD analysis of
the MgAl2O4 nanoparticles was performed using
a D8 Advance Bruker diffractometer with an 18 kW power source and
monochromated Cu Kα radiation (wavelength: 1.54 Å).
The FT-IR spectrum of the MgAl2O4 nanoparticles
was obtained using a Nicolet iS50 spectrophotometer in the range of
4000–400 cm–1. Besides, the surface morphology
of the MgAl2O4 nanoparticles was investigated
with a JSM-IT800 Schottky FE-SEM, which was equipped with an energy-dispersive
X-ray (EDX) unit. A Talos F200iS HR-TEM instrument was employed to
examine the morphology of the MgAl2O4 nanoparticles.
Furthermore, the concentration of congo red dye was measured at 498
nm using a Shimadzu UV-1650 PC UV–vis spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Characterization of Novel Material

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was investigated by using a D8 Advance Bruker diffractometer with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) from 20° to 80° at a rate of 0.002 2𝜃/s. The obtained diffractogram was processed with the X’pert High Score Plus software 2.1.0. Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) measurements were recorded using a PerkinElmer Frontier MIR/FIR spectrophotometer (Villebon-sur-Yvette, France) in KBr pellets in the spectral range of 400–4000 cm−1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was carried out using a Philips XL-30 (20 kV, magnification 31,000× and 70,000) (Eindhoven, Netherlands). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed using a TEM JEM-1400 (JEOL Company, Massachusetts, USA) with an accelerating voltage of 120 KV. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was conducted using a PerkinElmer STA 6000 thermal analyzer in the range of 25–750 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C/min under nitrogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Ir Nanoparticles and Atoms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structural properties of the samples were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a D8 Advance Bruker diffractometer (Cu Kα radiation  = 1.5406 Å, Bragg-Brentano geometry).
The samples were characterized by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) with a 200 kV FEG microscope (FEI Tecnai F20 equipped with a Gatan Energy Imaging Filter, resolution 0.24 nm).
A small amount of sample was ultrasonicated in ethanol solvent, then small drops of suspension were placed on carbon grids. The Ir nanoparticles size distribution and the average size were determined by statistical analyses of several TEM images.
The Ir-SAC specimen was analysed by high-angle annular dark-field imaging in scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) using a probe corrected JEOL 2100F electron microscope operating at 200 kV. This imaging technique was used to characterize the as-prepared Ir-SAC sample as well as to assess the single atoms stability against coalescence after treatment at high temperature. The thermal treatments were carried out by heating the sample at 250 °C and 400 °C with 10°C/min under 5%H2/Ar flow (200 ml/min) in an external resistive furnace.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Crystalline Phase Identification of Glass Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To check the amorphous nature of the samples and to identify the crystalline phases, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) measurements were carried out at room temperature using a D8 Advance Bruker diffractometer equipped with a primary monochromator, a fast Lynxeye detector and CuKα1 radiation (λ Cu =1.5406 Å) on the surface of the glass and glass-ceramic bulk samples.
The diffraction patterns of single crystals were recorded on a 4-circle Nonius diffractometer equipped with a graphite monochromator and a CCD camera. Data collection and reduction were performed with the program suite COLLECT, DIRAX/LSQ and EVALCCD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Structural Analysis of Nanoparticles by XRD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD of NDs was performed on a D8 Advance Bruker diffractometer (Bruker, UK) in a flat plate geometry using Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation and a Bruker Lynx eye detector. X-ray diffraction patterns were collected from 10 to 100 2θ with a step size of 0.02° and a count time of 0.1s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Structural and Compositional Analysis of Biochar@Ag

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used for structural characterization using a D8 Advance Bruker diffractometer (Cu Kα radiation). Data were acquired in the 5-80 ° 2θ range (step size = 0.01 °) using an incident wavelength 𝜆 of 1.54056 Å. XPS analysis of Biochar@Ag was performed using a NEXSA apparatus (Thermo), fitted with monochromated X-ray beam and operated in the constant analyzer energy mode. The pass energy was set to 200 and 80 eV for the survey and narrow regions, respectively. A flood gun was employed to compensate for the static charge buildup. SEM images and EDX spectra were obtained with a Zeiss Merlin Field Emission scanning electron microscope (Oberkochen, Germany), operated at 5 kV and coupled with a SDD X-Max from Oxford Instruments. The biochar samples were coated with a 3 nm-thin layer of palladium in order to avoid static charge. Palladium was deposited using a Cressington 208HR sputter-coater coupled with a Cressington MTM-20 thickness controller. Thermogravimetric analyses were conducted using a Setaram machine (Setsys Evolution model). The samples were heated up from RT to 800 °C, in air, at a heat rate of 10 °C/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!