The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ribo zero plus rrna depletion kit

Manufactured by Illumina
Sourced in United States

The Ribo-Zero Plus rRNA Depletion Kit is a laboratory equipment product designed for the selective removal of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) molecules from total RNA samples. The core function of this kit is to enable the depletion of rRNA, which typically accounts for the majority of RNA in a sample, in order to enrich the remaining RNA species and facilitate downstream applications such as transcriptome analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

59 protocols using ribo zero plus rrna depletion kit

1

Transcriptome Analysis of Veillonella dispar

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation (15,000 g for 1 min, 25°C). Total RNA was extracted using a Presto mini RNA bacteria kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of each extracted RNA sample was determined by using a Qubit fluorometer. The purity and integrity were assessed using a NanoPhotometer and an Agilent FA5200, respectively. For the RNA sequencing, cDNA libraries were prepared using the Illumina Ribo-Zero Plus rRNA Depletion kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Illumina pair-end reads (150-bp) RNA-seq were performed on an MiSeq platform by HGT Co. (Taiwan). The reads were trimmed and filtered for data quality control using a Phred score of 30. RNA-seq reads were mapped against the V. dispar ATCC 17748T reference genome. The raw counts were normalized using the trimmed mean of M values (TMM) method. The normalized gene matrix was analyzed using iDEP (45 (link)), a website providing integrated RNA-seq data analysis applications. Differential expressed genes analysis, principal-component analysis (PCA), and hierarchical clustering were performed using this web application. Hierarchical clustering was carried out with the average linkage method by correlation distance. KEGG enrichment pathway analysis was performed with KOBAS 2.0 (46 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptomics of Phage-Host Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transcriptomes were generated for six timepoints from each condition and RNA was extracted from frozen pellets using Qiagen RNEasy Mini Kit, total RNA was quantified and quality-assessed using the 2100 Expert Prokaryote Total RNA Pico kit and Agilent Bioanalyzer, rRNA sequences were depleted using an Illumina Ribo-Zero Plus rRNA Depletion Kit, libraries were created using the Illumina TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Kit, and sequenced on a HiSeq-2500 1 TB device, yielding paired-end 2 × 101 bp reads. Between 13 and 29 million reads were obtained per sample (median = 18.5 million reads). BBtools v35.84 following JGI’s default pipeline was used on raw reads to remove those containing two or more “N” bases with an average quality score across the read <10, with a length ≤51 bp, containing known Illumina artifacts, or mapping to PhiX, human, cat, dog, and mouse genomes with the identity of ≥93%. BBtools v35.84 trimmed reads to remove known Illumina artifacts in 5’ and 3’ ends, or when with a base quality score under 6 on 3’. Differential expression analyses were conducted with a custom-made R script used in numerous prior phage-host ‘omics studies [30 , 42 (link), 43 (link)]. Treatment samples were compared to their corresponding untreated control at each time point (e.g., T2 cyanovirocells versus T2 cyanobacteria only; T2 cyanovirocells with protist versus T2 cyanobacteria only).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Single-Cell RNA-Seq of Breast Epithelium

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Breast tissue samples donated to the Brisbane Breast Bank were obtained from five healthy donors who had breast reduction surgery (12 ) (Supplementary Table S1). Reduction mammoplasty samples were processed as described previously (13 (link)). In brief, samples were enriched for epithelial cell populations and suspensions were stained with a lineage marker antibody combination (anti-CD31, anti-CD45 and anti-CD140b; Supplementary Table S1) designed to exclude endothelial, hematopoietic, and leukocyte cells. The remaining lineage-negative cell superpopulation was sorted into basal (EpCAMlow/CD49fhi), luminal progenitor (EpCAMhi/CD49fhi), and luminal (EpCAMhi/CD49flow) cell types. Total RNA was extracted and ribodepleted with the Illumina Ribo-Zero Plus rRNA depletion kit. High-quality RNA (RIN ≥ 9.0, measured in Agilent 4200 Tapestation) was sent to NovogeneAIT Genomics (Singapore) for 150 paired end short-read total RNA sequencing, performed on the Illumina Novoseq 6000 platform. Each sample was sequenced across 2–3 lanes, yielding 30.6–67.3M read pairs (average of 49.9M). Base call accuracy for every sample was between 99.95% and 99.99% (average Phred-scale quality between 37 and 39). More details on sequencing quality and general metrics are given in File S1 and Supplementary Tables S1-4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA-Seq of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before RNA sequencing, RNA samples were assessed for quality using a 5400 Fragment analyser (Agilent) and for purity using a Nanodrop™ 2000/2000c spectrophotometer. RNA-Seq was performed in the Genomics Core Technology Unit at Queens’ University Belfast, following standard protocols of the KAPA (Stranded) RNA hYPERprep without Riboerase kit (Roche Diagnostics Ltd, UK) after rRNA removal using the Ribo-Zero Plus rRNA Depletion Kit (Illumina). 200 ng RNA was used as input, and generated libraries were quantified using Kapa Quantification before being normalized and pooled in equimolar amounts. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina NextSeq 500 platform, with 75-bp strand-specific paired-end reads. Sequencing data was returned as trimmed FASTQ files. These reads were mapped onto the P. aeruginosa genome PAO1 [14 (link)] using Bowtie 2 with default settings [15 (link)]. Mapped reads were counted using featurecounts from the Rsubread package [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive RNA-seq Analysis of Streptococcus pyogenes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA-seq analysis was performed at the Australian Centre for Ecogenomics (University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia). cDNA libraries were prepared from total RNA using TruSeq stranded total RNA library prep with Ribo-Zero Plus rRNA depletion kit (Illumina). Sequencing of the cDNA libraries was performed on the NovaSeq 6000 system (Illumina) on a 2 × 150-bp SP flow cell run generating an average of 20 million reads per sample. The quality of raw reads was assessed using FastQC v.0.11.0 (74 (link)). Reads <45 bp were filtered using cutadapt v.2.8 (75 (link)), and rRNA was filtered using SortMeRNA v.4.2.0 (76 (link)) with a database of rRNA from GAS strains 5448, SF370, and HKU488. Reads were aligned to the HKU16 reference genome (GCF_000275625.1) using BWA-MEM from bwa v.0.7.17 (77 ). Fragment counting (-p) was performed using featureCounts from subreads v. 2.0.0 (78 (link)) in a strand-specific fashion (-s 2), counting multimapped reads in the feature with largest overlap of the read (-O –largestOverlap). Differential expression of features was calculated using DEseq2 v.1.32.0 (79 (link)) and edgeR v.3.34.1 (80 (link)) in R v.4.1.1. Results were filtered to have a base mean expression of >100 fragments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Total RNA Isolation and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To isolate the total RNA from SBR5 cells, bacterial cell pellets previously harvested and stored at −80°C were thawed in ice, and RNA was extracted individually for each cultivation condition. All the procedures regarding RNA isolation and RNA quality control were done according to Brito et al. (2017a) (link). The three replicates of extracted RNA samples of each condition were pooled in equal parts, and the pool of total RNA was subsequently used for the preparation of complementary DNA (cDNA) libraries. For each condition, a whole transcriptome library was prepared. For removal of ribosomal RNA, Ribo-Zero Plus rRNA Depletion Kit (Illumina, San Diego, United States) was used according to manufacturer’s recommendations. The preparation of this library and the cDNA sequencing were carried out according to Mentz et al. (2013) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mosquito RNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of eight pools of mosquitoes were processed. The mosquito pools were placed in a 5 mL tube along with five glass beads (5 mm each) and 600 µL lysis buffer and homogenized in a Spex Mixer Mill (Spex SamplePrep, Metuchen, NJ, USA). Total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Plus universal mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and quantity of RNA were evaluated using LabChip GX (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). An RNA sequencing library was constructed using a TruSeq RNA Library Prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with ribosomal RNA depletion using a Ribo-Zero Plus rRNA depletion kit (Illumina). Paired-end (150 bp) sequencing of the dual-indexed libraries was performed on a NovaSeq platform (Illumina). All library preparation and sequencing were performed by the Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF), Melbourne, Australia.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RNA Sequencing Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
80 to 500 ng total RNA was used as input for rRNA depletion using either Illumina’s Ribo-Zero Gold rRNA Removal Epidemiology kit (discontinued) or Illumina’s Ribo-Zero Plus rRNA depletion kit (Illumina, cat# 20,037,135). For Ribo-Zero Plus depletion reactions, total RNA was mixed with 1 µl of DP1 (standard probe set) in the presence or absence of 1 to 1.5 µl of human microbiome probe pool (HMv1 or HMv2). Probes were hybridized and rRNA depleted as per manufacturer’s instructions. For undepleted samples, 10–20 ng total RNA was used as template for library preparation. RNAseq libraries were prepared using Illumina’s TruSeq Stranded mRNA Library Prep Kit (cat# 20,020,595) or Illumina’s Stranded Total RNA Prep Ligation Kit (cat# 20,040,529). Final libraries were quantified with the Quant-iT™ PicoGreen™ dsDNA Assay (ThermoFisher, cat# P7589) or the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay (ThermoFisher, cat# Q32851). Final library size was assessed by running libraries on the Agilent 4200 TapeStation System using D1000 ScreenTapes (Agilent, cat# 5067–5582) or alternatively, on Bioanalyzer High Sensitivity Chip (cat# 5067–4626). Individual libraries were then normalized, pooled, and sequenced on Illumina platforms (MiSeq, NextSeq or NovaSeq, see Supplemental Data File 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNA-seq Transcriptome Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA concentrations of each of the 12 samples were measured using the Qubit BR RNA assay, and the RNA quality was evaluated using TapeStation with the RNA ScreenTape (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States). All samples were rRNA depleted using the Ribo-Zero Plus rRNA Depletion Kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, United States), and residual DNA from RNA extraction was removed using the DNase MAX kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, United States). The samples were purified using the standard protocol for CleanPCR SPRI beads (CleanNA, Zuid, Netherlands) and further prepared for sequencing using the NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA library preparation kit (New England Biolabs, MA, United States). Library concentrations were measured using Qubit HS DNA assay and library DNA size estimated using TapeStation with D1000 ScreenTape. The samples were pooled in equimolar concentrations and paired-end sequenced (2 × 150 bp) using a HiSEQ X platform (Illumina, United States). All kits were used as per the manufacturer’s instructions with minor modifications.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transcriptome Analysis of lin-52 Mutant in C. elegans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A triplicate of RNA samples from lin-52 mutant and WT L1 worms were rRNA-depleted using Ribo-Zero Plus rRNA Depletion Kit (Illumina, 20037135) and sequenced using a Hiseq4000 (Illumina) with PE75 read length. For RNA quality control, the RNA integrity number was ≥9.4 for all samples. RNA-seq data were processed through the QuickNGS pipeline83 (link), Ensembl version 85. Reads were mapped to the C. elegans genome using Tophat84 (link) (version 2.0.10) and abundance estimation was done using with Cufflinks85 (link) (Version 2.1.1). DESeq2 (ref. 76 (link)) was used for differential gene expression analysis.
The human RNA-seq data were processed with Salmon-1.1 (ref. 86 (link)) against a decoy-aware transcriptome (gencode.v37 transcripts and the GRCh38.primary_assembly genome) with the following parameters: –validateMappings –gcBias –seqBias. The output was imported and summarized to the gene-level with tximport (1.14.2)87 (link), and differential gene analysis was done with edgeR (3.28.1)88 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!