The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Er sp1

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in United States, Germany, Azerbaijan

The ER-SP1 is a laboratory instrument designed for sample preparation and analysis. It is a compact and versatile device that offers reliable and efficient sample handling capabilities. The core function of the ER-SP1 is to assist in the preparation and processing of various sample types, enabling researchers and scientists to conduct their analyses with precision and consistency.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using er sp1

1

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of ER-Alpha in Breast Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tumors were removed, fixed in 4% formaldehyde, sectioned to 4 μm histological slices and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), as well as immune-stained for nuclear ERα. The immunostaining was performed using rabbit monoclonal anti-ER antibody (ER-SP1, Ventana Medical System, AZ, USA) and an automated slide staining BenchMark XT system operated, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Ventana Medical System, AZ, USA). An experienced breast pathologist evaluated the extent of intensity of staining [absent (i = 0), weak (i = +1), moderate (i = +2), or strong (i = +3)], and the percentage of ER-stained cell nuclei. These two evaluations were used for calculating a specific intensity index defined as: ΣI (i) × fraction of cells stained with (i).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histopathological Evaluation of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histopathological examination of tumor tissue obtained by core biopsy from patients included in the study was performed by standard histopathological methods before initiation of cancer treatment. Data were obtained from the original pathology records. In all patients, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression was determined using ER-SP 1 (Ventana/Roche) and PR-NCL-PGR-312 (Novocastra/Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany) antibodies. HER2 status was determined by immunohistological examination using HER2-4B5 antibody (Ventana/Roche) or by in-situ hybridization according to current ASCO/CAP guidelines [42] (link). Tumor grade was determined according to the Nottingham histological scoring system [43] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Histochemical and Immunohistochemical Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Alcian blue (pH 2.5)/Periodic Acid-Schiff (AB/PAS) histochemical staining was performed using standard methods, to highlight intracellular mucin and to distinguish neutral (magenta) from acidic (blue) mucin by light microscopy.
The following primary antibodies were used for immunohistochemistry: CK7 (OV-TL-12/30, Dako, 1:1600), CK20 (KS20.8; Dako, 1:800), PAX8 (BC12; Cell Signaling, 1:50), CDX2 (CDX2-88; Biogenex, 1:100), ER (SP1; Ventana, pre-diluted), PR (1E2; Ventana, pre-diluted), MUC6 (CLH5; Novocastra, 1:100), CD10 (56C6; Vector, 1:50), WT1 (WT49; Leica, pre-diluted), ARID1A (HPA005456; Sigma, 1:400, 30'). All immunohistochemical stains were performed on the BOND RX platform (Leica), using the standard protocol, with BOND Epitope Retrieval Solution ER2 (Leica) for 30 minutes, incubation of primary antibody for 30 minutes at room temperature and BOND Polymer Refine Detection (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Retrospective Study of Myoepithelial Sialadenoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. A retrospective search of the Washington University in St. Louis Department of Pathology and Immunology archive was searched from 1993 to 2013 for cases of MSH. Ten cases were identified that were diagnosed as MSH (a term used by one of the authors, HMM) and showed characteristic histopathologic features. Clinical and radiologic features were gathered from the electronic medical record. Hematoxylin and eosin slides were reviewed, and formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue blocks were retrieved for immunohistochemical studies (IHC). Pankeratin (AE1/AE3/PCK26, Ventana, Tucson AZ), keratin (34βE12, Ventana, Tucson AZ), cytokeratin 5/6 [(CK5/6), D5/16B4, Ventana, Tucson AZ], beta-catenin (14, Cell Marque, Rocklin CA), p63 (4A3, Ventana, Tucson AZ) estrogen receptor [(ER), SP1, Ventana, Tucson AZ], progesterone receptor [(PR), 1E2, Ventana, Tucson AZ], smooth muscle actin [(SMA), 1A4, Cell Marque, Rocklin CA], and CD34 (QBEnd/10, Ventana, Tucson AZ) (prediluted per standard protocol, single antibody stain procedure with adequate controls) were performed on eight cases at the Washington University AMP Core Laboratory. In addition, the pathology departmental archive was searched for all in-house breast core biopsies from 2014 to 2017 to aid in an approximate determination of the incidence of MSH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Synchronous DCIS and IBC Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients diagnosed with synchronous DCIS and adjacent IBC and treated at the Erasmus Medical Center -Cancer Institute in the period between 2010 and 2015 were included (n = 73). Patients with neoadjuvant treatment, previous breast irradiation or a history of breast cancer were excluded. The tumor cell percentage was estimated beforehand by a pathologist and only samples with an estimated tumor cell percentage ≥50% were included. DCIS grade was assessed primarily based on cytonuclear differentiation and IBC grade was assessed according to the modified Bloom Richardson score (Elston & Ellis 1991) (link). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on each IBC, using ER (ER SP1; Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.), PR (PR 1E2; Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.) and HER2 (HER2 4B5; Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.) antibodies. ER and PR status were scored positive when ≥10% of the tumor cells were positive, according to the Dutch Breast Cancer Guideline (NABON 2017). HER2 status was scored according to the international guidelines (Wolff et al. 2014) (link). For this study, coded leftover patient material was used in accordance with the Code of Conduct of the Federation of Medical Scientific Societies in The Netherlands (FEDERA 2011). Therefore, there was no need for an informed consent or study approval by an ethical committee. Figure 1 provides an overview of the workflow.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!