The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Resistant starch kit

Manufactured by Megazyme
Sourced in Ireland

The Resistant Starch Kit is a laboratory equipment designed to measure the resistant starch content in food samples. It provides a standardized method for the quantitative determination of resistant starch.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using resistant starch kit

1

Cassava Starch Characterization and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cassava var. Kasetsart was obtained from cassava farmers in Margomulyo Village, Jati Agung District, South Lampung Districts, Indonesia, harvested nine months after planting. Pure culture of S. cerevisiae was purchased from the culture collection of microbiology laboratory of Bogor Agricultural University. Xanthan gum (Sigma-Aldrich G-12530), alpha-amylase (Sigma-Aldrich A-4862), pepsin (Sigma-Aldrich P-7000), amyloglucosidase (Supelco A-9913) obtained by PT Laborindo Sarana, Jakarta; cassava starch was obtained from PD Semangat Jaya, Pesawaran, Lampung; Megazyme Resistant Starch Kit and Megazyme Amylose/Amylopectin Kit (Megazyme Bray Business Park, Bray, Co. Wicklow, Beni Hidayat et al.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Starch Composition in FCPF Flour

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RS, Non-RS, and amylose/amylopectin contents of the FCPF-based composite flour sampels were measured using the Megazyme Resistant Starch Kit and the Megazyme Amylose/Amylopectin Kit (Megazyme Bray Business Park, Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland) according to the Approved Method 32-40 (AACCI, 2010) . Total starch content is the sum of resistant starch and non-resistant (solubilised) starch.
The procedure of the analysis was a modification of Con A methods developed by Yun and Matheson (1990) . The analysis of chemical properties was carried out in three replicates and the data obtained were reported as mean ± SD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Grain Starch Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total amount of starch in the grain was measured by enzymatic methods using the enzymes in Resistant Starch kit (Megazyme, K-RSTAR). A grain was ground in 500 μL of 80%(v/v) ethanol using the Multi-beads Shocker MB2000. The sample was incubated at 85 °C for 5 min. After the centrifugation at 1800 × g, the pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of 80% (v/v) ethanol and centrifuged to obtain a pellet. The pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of 100 mM sodium maleate buffer (pH 6.0) and centrifuged at 1800 × g. After washing three times, the pellet was incubated in 1 mL of 100 mM sodium maleate buffer (pH 6.0) containing 5 mg mL−1 pancreatic α-amylase and 1.5 unit mL−1 amyloglucosidase at 37 °C for 16 h. The supernatant was recovered after centrifugation at 1800 × g for 5 min. The pellet was resuspended with 1 mL of 50% (v/v) ethanol and centrifuged again. The supernatant was recovered and put together with the previous supernatant. This procedure was repeated three times. Finally, the supernatant was adjusted to 10 mL with water. The supernatant (110 μL) was mixed with 900 μL of 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.5). The 110 μL of the mix was treated with amyloglucosidase at 50 °C for 20 min. The glucose amount in the sample was measured using GOPOD reagent (Megazyme).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Determination of Starch Fractions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total starch content was determined using a resistant starch kit (Megazyme International Ireland, Bray, Ireland) as described by Mansilla et al. [21 (link)]. Total starch content was considered as resistant starch plus non-resistant starch. The values obtained were used as a reference to analyze starch digestion.
During digestion, aliquots of 1 mL were taken at time 0 of oral, gastric, and intestinal phases and then at 10, 20, 30, 60, and 120 min to monitor starch hydrolysis. The reducing sugar content was determined by the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method [7 (link)]. The RDS value was obtained from the glucose released after 20 min. SDS was measured from the glucose released after an additional 100 min of incubation. Starch that remained unhydrolyzed after 120 min of incubation was considered resistant starch after fitting the results to an exponential equation, as explained by the referenced authors [7 (link)]. At the same time, total hydrolysis (TH) was measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

BARLEYmax Granola Nutrient Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The study food included 40 g of BARLEYmax granola (TEIJIN LIMITED, Tokyo, Japan) containing 20.4 g of BARLEYmax. It consisted of brown sugar syrup, oats, puffed brown rice, coconut, rice oil, prune puree, dried mango, dried papaya, dried pineapple, and citric acid. Regarding the nutritional facts, 40 g of the study food contained 169 kilocalories, 3.32 g of protein, 5.76 g of fat, 23.08 g of sugar, 5.72 g of dietary fiber, and 0.48 g of resistant starch. Dietary fiber constituted 1.2 g of β-glucan and 2.32 g of fructan. The nutrient components were analyzed by the Japan Food Research Laboratories (Tokyo, Japan). The amount of total resistant starch, β-glucan, and fructan were measured using the resistant starch kit, mixed-linkage beta-glucan kit, and fructan kit, respectively (Megazyme, Sydney, Australia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Resistant Starch Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Resistant starch (RS) was determined using a Resistant Starch kit (Megazyme International Wicklow, AOAC Method 2002.02 and AACC Method 32-40). Samples (100 mg) were incubated with pancreatic α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) containing amyloglucosidase (AMG) (EC 3.2.1.3) at 37°C with continuous shaking (200 strokes /min) for 16 h. The tubes were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant was carefully decanted and the pellets re-suspended in 2 ml of 50% ethanol with vigorous stirring on a vortex mixer. A further 6 ml 50% ethanol was added, mixed and centrifuged again at 3,000 rpm for 10 min.
The supernatant was decanted and the extraction repeated followed by centrifugation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!