The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

41 protocols using ab23980

1

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blotting Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies for immunoprecipitation were anti-LSD1 (ab17721, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-GFI1B (sc-28356X, Santa Cruz Biotech, Dallas, TX, USA), anti-RUNX1 (ab23980, Abcam), anti-H3K27ac (39133, Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA, USA), anti-CoREST (ab32631, Abcam), normal rabbit IgG (sc-2027, Santa Cruz), and normal mouse IgG (sc-2025, Santa Cruz). The primary antibodies for western blotting were anti-LSD1 (C69G12, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), anti-CoREST (ab32631, Abcam), anti-HDAC1 (ab7028, Abcam), anti-HDAC2 (ab7029, Abcam), anti-GFI1B (sc-28356X or sc-22795, Santa Cruz), anti-RUNX1 (ab23980, Abcam, or sc-365644, Santa Cruz), anti-ERG (ab133264, Abcam), and anti-ACTIN (sc-1616, Santa Cruz). The secondary antibodies were anti-rabbit IgG (NA934V, GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK), anti-mouse IgG (NA931V, GE Healthcare), and anti-goat IgG (sc-2020, Santa Cruz) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Runx1 Protein Interaction Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
293 cells (CRL-1573; ATCC) were transfected with Flag-mRunx1 construct (14585; Addgene). Cells were lysed with RIPA buffer 24 h post transfection and immunoprecipitated with IgG control, Runx1 (ab23980; Abcam) or Flag (F7425; Sigma) antibodies. Western blot was performed with anti-Runx1 (ab23980; Abcam) and anti-Flag-HRP (A8592; Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Osteoblast Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested, sectioned and lysed in 10 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.4, containing 0.1% SDS, a protease inhibitor cocktail and DNase. Primary antibodies used for western blot analysis were rabbit anti-human ALP antibody (Catalog: ab95462, abcam, USA), rabbit anti-human OCN antibody (ab133612, abcam, USA mouse anti-human OPN (Catalog: ab69498, abcam, USA) and mouse anti-human RUNX-2 antibody (Catalog: ab23980, abcam, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunocytochemical Analysis of Cellular Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The procedures of immunocytochemistry were described previously19 (link). Nucleuses were stained with DAPI (1 μg/ml) or PI (2 μg/ml) containing RNase A (50 μg/ml). Samples were examined with a BZ-9000 inverted fluorescence microscope (Keyence). Anti-GFAP rabbit polyclonal antibodies (G4546, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-MBP rat monoclonal antibody (MAB386, Millipore), anti-Ki-67 rabbit polyclonal antibodies (AB9260, Millipore), anti-Hif1α rabbit polyclonal antibodies (NB100-479, Novus Biologicals), anti-Hif2α rabbit polyclonal antibodies (NB100-122, Novus Biologicals), Anti-CDKN2B (p15/INK4b) rabbit polyclonal antibodies (bs-4269R, Bioss Antibody), anti-RUNX1/AML1 rabbit polyclonal antibodies (ab23980, Abcam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunophenotyping of Rat Optic Nerve Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
P14 rat optic nerve derived anti-GC-panned cells26 (link) were stained with AlexaFluor647-labeled A2B5 antibody (#563776, BD Biosciences). Stained cells were resuspended in staining medium with 1 μg/ml PI, and sorted by SORP FACSAria (BD Biosciences). Cells were attached to glass slides by Cytospin (Thermo Scientific) and were fixed with 4% PFA-PBS fixative. Each slide was stained with following primary and secondary antibodies: Alexa Fluor488-labeled anti-Ki67 mouse monoclonal antibody (1:100; #558616, BD Biosciences), anti-Runx1 rabbit polyclonal antibodies (1:100; ab23980, Abcam), and anti-rabbit IgG-Cy3 donkey polyclonal antibodies (1:500; 711-165-152, Jackson ImmunoResearch). Samples were incubated with primary antibodies overnight in humidified chambers at 4 °C. Secondary antibody and nuclear stain DAPI were placed on sections for 2 hours at RT. Samples were mounted with PermaFluor (Labvision), and analyzed by a laser-scanning confocal microscopy (FV-10; Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

CUT&Tag Analysis of Runx1 Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SW982 cells were grown to confluence in 100-mm dishes, treated for 24 h with 10 ng/mL TGF-β1, and used for CUT&Tag assay analysis. A NovoNGS ChiTag Transposon Kit (Novoprotein, PR China) was used following the manufacturer’s recommended protocol.49 (link) An anti-Runx1 antibody (ab23980; Abcam, USA) was used to pull down DNA-protein complexes, and rabbit IgG was used as an NC. Purified DNA was quantified by qRT-PCR, and GAPDH was used as a reference. The primer sequences used to amplify the predicted binding sites of Runx1 are provided in Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

ChIP-seq for Transcription Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP assays were performed as described previously (Ptasinska et al., 2012 (link)). Nuclei were essentially prepared as described previously (Lefevre et al., 2003 (link)). The following antibodies were used: C/EBPα, SC-61 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); ETO (C terminus specific), SC-9737 (Santa Cruz); HDAC2, SC-6296 (Santa Cruz); HEB, SC-357 (Santa Cruz); LMO2, AF2726 (R&D Systems); LYL1, SC-374164 (Santa Cruz); PU.1, SC-352 (Santa Cruz); p300, SC-585 (Santa Cruz); RUNX1 (C terminus specific), ab23980 (Abcam) or IgG rabbit 12-370 (Millipore); IgG goat, SC-2346 (Santa Cruz); and IgG mouse, SC-2025 (Santa Cruz). Precipitated material was subjected to library preparation and run on an Illumina Hiseq 2000 sequencer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of Cell Signaling Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted by RIPA lysis buffer (Sangon Biotech). After that, BCA protein assay kit (Tanon, Shanghai, China) was utilized to quantify the total protein. The protein (about 40 µg) was resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then transferred onto the nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dried milk (Yili, Beijing, China). Afterward, the membranes were probed by primary antibody against Cyclin D1 (1:1500, ab226977, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), Cleaved Caspase-3 (1:500, ab49822, Abcam), RUNX1 (1:500, ab23980, Abcam) or GAPDH (1:2500, ab9485, Abcam) at 4°C for 12 h, followed by interaction with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:4000, ab205718, Abcam). Finally, enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Tanon) was used to observe the protein bands, and ImageJ software was employed to quantify the protein expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Chondrocyte Differentiation and Runx1 ChIP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chondrocytes were induced from ATDC5 cell line for 7 days and Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed as previously described [22 (link)]. After immunoprecipitation using monoclonal anti-Runx1 antibody (ab23980; Abcam) and DNA extraction, quantitative PCR was performed using the primers in the promoter region of the mouse gene Ihh. Primer sequences are presented in the Supplementary Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunoprecipitation of PU.1 Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-Flag mAb (M2, Sigma-Aldrich) were used for immunoprecipitation. Protein extracts from Myc-Flag-tagged PU.1-infected Scid.adh.2c2 cells were prepared using RIPA buffer (1% NP- 40, 0.25% Na-deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 1 µg/ml of aprotinin, leupeptin and pepstatin, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF and Tris-HCl, 50mM, pH 7.4). For immunoprecipitation analyses, the cell lysates were subjected to a pre-clear process with control IgG coupled agarose (Sigma-Aldrich) at 4oC for 1 hr with rotation. The pre-cleared extracts were subjected to immunoprecipitation with an anti-Flag M2 agarose (Sigma-Aldrich) at 4oC for 16 hr, and then the immunocomplexes were eluted from the agarose by 3xFlag peptide, and the eluted PU.1 complexes were run on 10% polyacrylamide gels. After electrophoresis, the proteins were subjected to immunoblotting as described previously (Hosokawa et al., 2013 (link)). Nuclear extracts were prepared using NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo Scientific). The antibodies used for the Immunoblot analyses were anti-Satb1 (ab109122, Abcam), anti-Runx1 (ab23980, Abcam), anti-Lamin B (sc-6217, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), and anti-Myc (PL14, MBL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!