The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using seven2go

1

Octanoic Acid and Trihexylamine Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Octanoic acid (Acros Organics, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and trihexylamine (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used as received for the preparation of the T6A OA organic mixture. Hydrochloric acid (37%, Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA), nitric acid (65%, Merck), bromic acid (47%, Merck), hydroioidic acid (55%, BDH Chemicals, Radnor, PA, USA), and perchloric acid (70%, Acros Organics) were diluted with Milli-Q water (deionized with Simplicity Millipore deionizer, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) to the pH values at which they were used. Sodium hydroxide (>99%, Merck) and potassium hydroxide solution (87.5%, J. T. Baker, Radnor, PA, USA) were similarly diluted.
trihexylamine and Octanoic acid were mixed in 1:1 mole ratio, based on weighings with an analytical balance. After initial mixing, samples were stirred 20+ hours, using a magnetic stirrer.
For the extraction experiments, 4.00 mL of the organic phase were mixed with an equal volume of the aqueous phase and shaken, overnight on a Beun De-Ronde wrist-shaker. Phases were then isolated using a Medilite centrifuge, and the resulting phases were separated by a syringe.
pH measurements of the aqueous phase were conducted with a Mettler-Toledo Seven2Go apparatus (Columbus, OH, USA) and a a Mettler-Toledo InLab Expert electrode. The pH meter was calibrated, prior to each round of measurements, using Certipur buffer standards (Merck).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Meat pH Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH values of the breasts and drumsticks were measured according to a previously described method (Heo et al., 2021 ). After each treatment, 1 g of the homogenized sample was added to each tube containing 9 mL distilled water and mixed thoroughly for 30 s using a homogenizer (T25 Basic, Ika Co., Staufen, Germany). After homogenization, the solution was centrifuged (Hanil Science Industrial Co., Ltd.) at 2,265 × g for 10 min at 4°C and the pH value of the resulting supernatant was measured using a pH meter (Seven 2Go, Mettler-Toledo International Inc., Schwerzenbach, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Soil pH Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A pH electrode (InLad Micro, Mettler Toledo®) connected to the pH/ORP meter (Seven2Go, Mettler Toledo®) was calibrated using standard solutions of pH 4, pH 7, and pH 11. After the calibration, the electrodes were inserted directly into the vacutainer tube to take the measurement. The pH of the soil solution samples were measured within 24 h of sample collection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

pH Measurement of Solid Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2.2.1. pH Value
The pH value of the samples was measured in triplicate using a penetrating electrode (InLab Solids Pro) adapted to the portable pH meter Seven2Go (Mettler Toledo, Greinfensee, Switzerland). For the pH determination, the electrode was inserted in the center of each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Soil Biogeochemical Properties Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soil pH was determined using the digital pH meter (Seven2Go, Mettler-Toledo Instruments (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) in a 1:2.5soil /water suspension after shaking at 250 rpm for 5 min. TC and TN contents were determined using a Vario micro-Cube elemental analyzer (Analyzer Vario MICRO cube, Elementar, Germany). Soil NO3–N and NH4+−N were extracted by 2 M KCl and their contents were determined using a colorimetric method by an AutoAnalyser III continuous Flow Analyzer (Bran + Luebbe, AA3 AutoAnalyzer, German). MBC and MBN contents were determined using the chloroform fumigation extraction method and the extracted liquid was determined by a TOC analyzer (Multi C/N 3000, Analytik Jena, Germany)29 (link). The TP content was determined by the antimony molybdenum anti-colorimetric method after perchloric acid digestion, MBP was extracted with 0.5 M NaHCO3 and its content was measured using the chloroform fumigation extraction method, AP was also extracted with 0.5 M NaHCO3, all of the production were detected by antimony molybdenum anti-colorimetric method described by Bray and Kurtz30 (link). DOC was extracted with 0.5 M K2SO4 after shaking at 200 rpm for 1 h, then the filtrates were used to determine the DOC content in the Vario TOC element analyzer (Elementar, Hanau, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Leaf Electrolyte Leakage Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Efflux of electrolytes was determined according to the protocol of Thiaw (2003) . For each tree, three discs of three different fully expanded leaves were cut with a cork borer, rinsed with distilled water and then placed in test tubes containing 10 mL of distilled water. Test tubes were submerged in a water bath for 2 h at 45 °C. Solution conductivity (C1) was measured with a conductivity meter (Mettler Toledo Seven2Go) after cooling to room temperature. Conductivity was measured a second time (C2) after placing the samples in the water bath for 1 h at 100 °C and then cooled at room temperature. Electrolyte leakage percentage (FE%) was calculated with the formula: FE (%) = (C1/C2) × 100 (Tripathy et al., 2000) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Determination of pH and VBN in Meat

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Meat samples (1 g) were homogenized with Deionized distilled water (DDW, 9 mL), and the pH was measured using a pH meter (Seven2Go; Mettler-Toledo, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland) following a method [2 ]. Prior to the measurement, the pH meter was calibrated with standard buffers at 4.01, 7.00, and 9.21 (Mettler-Toledo Inc., Switzerland).
VBN was analyzed using the method described by Lee et al [10 (link)]. Each sample (3 g) in 27 mL of DDW was homogenized for 30 s (T25 digital ULTRA TURRAX; IKA, Staufen, Germany) followed by centrifugation (Continent 512R; Hanil Co., Ltd., Incheon, Korea) at 2,265×g for 10 min. After filtration, 0.01 N boric acid and indicator solution (0.66% methyl red in ethanol:0.66% bromocresol green in ethanol = 1:1 [v/v]) were placed individually in the inner section of a conway (Sibata Ltd., Sitama, Japan). Then, 1 mL of sample and 50% potassium carbonate were added into the outer section of the conway, after which the lid was sealed immediately. The conways were incubated at 37°C for 1 h and titrated with 0.01 N hydrogen chloride. The VBN values were expressed in mg/100 g.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Honey Electrical Conductivity Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The electrical conductivity of honey was measured at 20 °C in a solution of honey (20 g of dry matter in 100 mL of deionized water) using the conductometer Seven2Go (Mettler Toledo, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland) [53 ,54 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Sputum culture and pH analysis for S. maltophilia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, 50 μL sputum was inoculated onto 7H10 + 10% OADC agar plates. Next, the sputum sample was subjected to alkaline decontamination treatment with NALC and 4% NaOH for 15 min, and neutralized with phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). After centrifugation, a resuspended 100-μL portion was inoculated on the L-J slant. MGIT 960 indicator tubes (MGIT) (Becton, Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) supplemented with OADC and PANTA antibiotic mixture were used to test the growth of S. maltophilia. The pH of the liquid in the degraded L-J slants was measured by a Seven2Go portable pH meter with an InLab Ultra-Micro-ISM electrode (Mettler-Toledo GmbH, Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Electrical Conductivity Measurement of Solutions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The electrical conductivity of the sample solutions was measured by a conductivity meter (Seven2Go, METTLER TOLEDO, Switzerland) at room temperature (22–25 °C). First, 5 mL of sample solution was transferred to a 15-mL centrifuge tube. Then, the probe was submerged in the sample solution until the sensor was covered and the measured values stabilised.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!