The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using sodium hypochlorite

1

Quantification of Thiol Metabolites by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following reagents (with their sources indicated in parentheses) were used: acetonitrile and methanol (LC-MS grade, J.T. Baker), formic acid (EMD), dithiothreitol (Bio-Rad), N-ethylmaleimide (Pierce), sodium hypochlorite (Fisher Scientific), L-cysteine-13C315N, N-acetyl cysteine-13C315N, cystine-13C615N2, homocysteine-3,3,4,4-d4, and caffeine-13C3 (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories). L-cysteine-glutathione disulfide (Cayman). All other reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.

Composition and concentration of analytes in the QC standard (all thiols were blocked with NEM before adding to the mixture).

NameAbbreviationConc (µM)
L-cysteineCys8.0
GlutathioneGSH2.2
N-acetyl cysteineNAC10.0
L-homocysteineHcy3.0
L-cysteine-L-glycineCG3.0
γ-L-glutamyl-L-cysteineγ-EC1.1
CystineCystine15.4
Glutathione disulfideGSSG2.0
N-acetyl cysteine disulfideNACss8.0
L-cysteine-L-glycine disulfideCGss2.6
L-cysteine-glutathione disulfideGSH-ss-Cys6.0
L-cysteine-homocysteine disulfideHcy-ss-Cys3.2
L-cysteine-N-acetyle cysteine disulfideNAC-ss-cys5.4
L-cysteine-CysGly disulfideCG-ss-Cys6.9
L-cysteine-γGluCys disulfideγ-EC-ss-Cys0.8
CaffeineCaff4.2
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Gnotobiotic Zebrafish Embryo Derivation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For all experiments, zebrafish embryos were initially derived germ-free using previously described gnotobiotic procedures with slight modification [75 (link)]. Briefly, fertilized eggs from adult mating pairs were harvested and incubated in sterile embryo media (EM) containing ampicillin (100 μg/mL), gentamicin (10 μg/mL), amphotericin B (250 ng/mL; MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA), tetracycline (1 μg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and chloramphenicol (1 μg/mL; Amresco, Solon, OH) for approximately 6 hours. Embryos were then washed in EM containing 0.1% polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine (Syndel, Ferndale, WA) followed by EM containing 0.003% sodium hypochlorite (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH). Surface sterilized embryos were distributed into T25 tissue culture flasks (TPP, Trasadingen, Switzerland) containing 15 mL sterile EM at a density of 1 embryo/mL and kept in a temperature-controlled room at 28°C to 30°C with a 14 hours/ 10 hours light/dark cycle. The germ-free status of larval zebrafish was assessed before every experiment by visually inspecting flask water for microbial contaminants using an inverted microscope. Culture-based assessment of germ-free status was done as needed by plating 100 μL flask water on rich media (e.g., tryptic soy agar). Embryos were sustained on yolk-derived nutrients and not fed prior to or during any experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Sterilization of Plant Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This involved about 100 genera of field-plants covering cereal, pulse, oilseed, fruit, vegetable, ornamental, medicinal, tuber and forage crops, grasses, weeds, and forest species (Table 1). The list included herbs, shrubs, climbers, and trees across annual and perennial species covering dicots and monocots mostly from India (Bengaluru, Karnataka State, or parts of neighboring Kerala and Tamil Nadu States) and some Australian plants (Adelaide, SA, Australia). Tissue segments from tender shoot or petiole tissues of field-grown plants were generally used. Wherever field plants were not accessible, seedlings/plants raised in glasshouse on soil-based medium were employed. Tissues were used after surface sterilization, which involved two initial rinses in autoclaved distilled water (ADW) containing 0.1% Tween-20 and 5–6 min sodium hypochlorite (2% available chlorine; Fisher Scientific, Mumbai, India) treatment with a change of disinfectant after 3 min, and final six rinses in sterile water. When tender tissues such as coleoptile or hypocotyl of seedlings was used, the duration of chemical treatment (3 min) or the strength of disinfectant was reduced (1% chlorine).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Continuous Flow Bromine Generation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The reactor was constructed according to the scheme presented in Figure 1. All connections were poly(ethylene-co-tetrafluoroethylene) (ETFE) T-mixers and Luer lock adapters, as polyether ether ketone (PEEK) gets easily degraded by Br2. All tubing was polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and had, unless stated otherwise, an internal diameter (ID) of 1 mm.
Hydrobromic acid was bought in a 48 w% solution in water from Acros Organics, and sodium hypochlorite in a 13% active chlorine solution in water from Fisher Scientific (Hampton, NH, USA), but both were titrated (acid-base and iodometric), since the exact concentration can differ from the labeled one, especially for NaOCl. This concentration also diminishes over time, even when refrigerated. Anhydrous Na2SO3 was bought from Fisher Scientific and a stock solution was made in water (200 g/L).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cellulose Acetate-Based Nanocomposite Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cellulose acetate (M.W. 100,000) supplied by Acros Organics (Somerville, NJ, USA) was used as matrix polymer in the preparation of the nanocomposite membranes. N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, ≥99.8%) purchased from Alfa Aesar (Haverhill, MA, USA) was used as the polymer solvent without further purification. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) with an average molecular weight of 1,300,000 was supplied by Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and was used as a pore forming agent. Bovine serum albumins (BSA, fraction V, 97%) with an average molecular weight of 67 kDa and dextran with different molecular weights ranging from 4 to 5000 kDa were purchased from the Fisher Scientific and were used as received. Softwood pulp, made predominately from Loblolly Pine, was supplied by the International Paper Company (Clifton, NJ, USA) and was used for CNF production. Other chemicals used were 2,2,6,6-Tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (TEMPO, 98%), sodium bromide (NaBr), and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl, 14.5% available chlorine) and were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Hampton, NH, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PHB Extraction from S. geitleri Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells of S. geitleri (28 day old) were harvested by centrifugation at 5000× g for 10 min and lyophilized. The lyophilized cells were digested with 4% (w/v) sodium hypochlorite (Fisher Scientific, Ottawa, ON, Canada) at 37 °C for 15 h [23 (link)]. The residual material was centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min and the residue was washed thrice with 10 mL each of water, acetone, ethanol, and ether. The resulting residue was air dried; subjected to warm chloroform extraction and filtered. The supernatant containing PHB was concentrated using a vacuum rotary evaporator, precipitated using 10 mL of ice-cold methanol and centrifuged. The precipitate thus obtained was air dried and used for further analysis of PHB [8 (link),24 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating P. indica's Impact on Soil Microbiome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To examine whether P. indica affects other soil microorganisms, wheat was grown in 3 L pots containing one of two soil types, SCL or LSO, as above. Winter wheat seeds, cv.
Battalion, were surface disinfected by rinsing for 2 mins in 20 mL L -1 sodium hypochlorite (Fisher Scientific UK Ltd, UK), followed by three rinses in sterilized distilled water, and germinated on damp filter paper in a Petri dish at room temperature (21 ± 1 °C) under natural indoor light for 48 hours. No micro-organisms grew from a sample of seeds so treated and placed on PDA plates for one week. Pre-germinated seeds were planted into 3 L pots (one seed per pot). This experiment had a 2×2×4 factorial combinations of ±P. indica × two soil types × four harvesting points, with two replications completely randomised. The pots were incubated at temperatures ranging between 15 and 25 °C; humidity and light were not controlled. Inoculation with 4 g liquid culture of P. indica mixed with soil was done at the time of sowing. Root and soil samples were collected at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after inoculation (wai) for DNA extraction, PCR and DGGE analysis, as below. Samples were transferred and stored as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Formation and Characterization of Disinfection Byproducts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Materials. All chemicals were of analytical grade or higher and were used as received without further purification. Milli-Q water (18.2 MΩ.cm, Millipore) was used for all experiments. Resorcinol (≥ 99.0%) and other model compounds were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Table S1). Sodium hypochlorite (5.65-6%, Fisher Scientific) and ammonium chloride (99.6%, Acros Organics) were used for monochloramine preparation. 15 N-labeled ammonium chloride was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (98%). Sodium thiosulfate (Fisher Scientific) was applied to quench residual oxidant. A trihalomethanes (THM) calibration mix, a mixed standard (EPA 551B Halogenated Volatiles Mix) containing haloacetonitriles (HANs), and a mixed standard (EPA 552.2 Methyl Ester Calibration Mix) containing 9 haloacetic acids (HAAs) were supplied from Supelco (Sigma-Aldrich). Chloro-, dichloro-and trichloroacetamide were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Decafluorobiphenyl (99%, Sigma-Aldrich, Supelco) was used as a surrogate standard. 2-bromopropionic acid (Fluka Analytical) was used as a surrogate for HAAs extraction and analysis. Fisher Scientific Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and ethyl acetate (> 99%) were used for DBP extractions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Potassium Ferrate Oxidation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Potassium ferrate (K2FeO4, 93%), potassium bromide (99.95%), potassium iodide (99.99%), and other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, US) or Fisher-Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ, US). All aqueous solutions were prepared with ultrapure water produced by a Milli-Q system (Advantage A10, Millipore, Billerica, MA). The chlorine was sourced as a laboratory grade ~5.5% solution of sodium hypochlorite (Fisher-Scientific). The strength of chlorine stock solution was confirmed by titration each time before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Isolation and Characterization of Complement Components

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Never dried Pinus radiata kraft pulp was kindly provided by CMPC (Chile), while NaBr was from Merck and sodium hypochlorite was from Fisher Scientific. 2,2,6,6tetramethylpiperidinyl-1-oxyl (TEMPO), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), PBS with calcium and magnesium, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and paraformaldehyde were all purchased from SigmaAldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Non-pyrogenic sterile saline (0.9% NaCl) and endotoxin free, non-pyrogenic, water from B. Braun (Melsungen, Germany). The anti-coagulant lepirudin (Refludan) was obtained from Celgene Europe (Windsor, GB).
Antibodies had the following specification: anti-CD14 FITC, PE anti-CD11b phycoerythrin, PE mouse IgG control all from BD BioSciences (San Jose, CA, USA). Aantihuman C5b-9 clone aE11 (Diatec, Oslo, Norway), and biotinylated 9C4 was an in-house made antibody as described in. 37 with BD vacutainer tops and BD vacutainer glass (Belliver Industrial Estate, Plymouth, UK) used for blood sampling and glass control, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!