The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using evos inverted microscope

1

Osteogenic Differentiation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded at a density of 1 x 105 cells/250 µL complete MEMα into each well of a 24-well plate and incubated for 24 h. The complete MEMα was then replaced with 500 µL fresh complete MEMα and the plate was incubated for 48 h. The media was replaced with vehicle or BMM and incubated for 72 h. This process was continued every other day for a total of 14 days from first treatment. Half of the wells were harvested for mRNA. The remaining wells were stained with Alizarin Red S (ARS) to quantify total mineralization. Briefly, cells were fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin for 5 min at room temperature and then stained with 2% ARS (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat #: A5533-25G) at pH 4.1 in water (2 g/100 mL) for 30 min at room temperature. Excess stain was washed out in running tap water until the water ran clear. Representative images were captured on an EVOS inverted microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Stain from each wells was quantified after lysing entire contents as described elsewhere using an acetic acid extraction method and plate reader absorbance at 405 nm [16] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Wound Healing Assay with OVCAR Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The OVCAR5 NTC and sh1 KD cells and OVCAR7 EV and LRRC15 OE cells were scratched with 10μl pipette tips and replaced with fresh media. 0hr/24hr images were captured using an EVOS inverted microscope (ThermoFischer Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Scratch Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In 12-well plates,
2 × 105 cells per well were grown in monolayers to
full confluence. A longitudinal scratch was made with a sterile pipette
tip at the bottom of each well. Wells were washed with PBS and cells
were treated with the corresponding medium with mA4 at concentrations
of 2.5 and 5 μM and without mA4 (control). As an assay control,
cellular migration was also evaluated after incubation of A4 at a
concentration of 2 μM. Fetal bovine serum was not used for the
treatments, as it could degrade the aptamers.
Images were acquired
using an EVOS inverted microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham,
MA, USA) at 0, 24, and 48 h after the treatments. The open (wounded)
areas of the images were calculated using the ImageJ program (v1.52o,
NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) to assess cell migration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Confocal Microscopy for Subcellular Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were imaged with the confocal microscope Leica TCS SP5 fitted with the HCX APO 63×/1.30 Corr (glycerol) CS 21objective or Evos inverted microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Where applicable, experiments were run in at least duplicates and repeated at least three times with similar results. Micrographs were collected at least 10 frames per sample. The data set was blinded and analyzed. The data are represented as normalized between experiments or single experiments where repetitions show similar results.
Images were analyzed using Fiji (NIH). For co-localization studies, confocal images were automatically analyzed and individual cells were manually selected as region of interest. The data were analyzed using JASP software. The data are shown as mean values with standard deviation as error bars. Statistical significance was investigated by non-paired Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test (P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Wound Healing and 3D Invasion Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For wound-healing assays, WM1158 cells were transduced twice (24 and 48 hours post-seeding), with shRNA-expressing viruses. Twenty-four hours post-transduction, scratches were created on cell monolayers with a 200 μl pipette tip, followed by rinsing and replenishment with Tu media (0.2% FBS). Phase-contrast images were taken after wounding (0 and 24 hour) with an EVOS inverted microscope (Thermo-Fisher). Individual migrating cells were enumerated using the particle counting function in ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
For 3-dimensional invasion assays, WM1158 cells were transduced with lentivirus shRNA vectors in two sequential infections (MOI 104/infection). Twenty-four hours post-transduction, cell aggregates were generated by dissociating cell monolayers and re-plating 104 cells/well in TU2% in a 96-well dish coated with 0.75% agarose. Cell aggregates were formed overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2 and embedded (1/well) in 100µl of a 50:50 mixture of Matrigel and TU2% on ice; 8 aggregates per condition were plated in each independent experiment. Gels were solidified at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 30min prior, then imaged at 0 and 24h after plating. Invading cells, defined as cells penetrating past the border of the initial cell aggregate, were quantified at using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scratch Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The OVCAR5 NTC and sh1 KD cells and OVCAR7 EV and LRRC15 OE cells were scratched with 10 μL pipette tips and replaced with fresh media. Zero-hour/24-hour images were captured using an EVOS inverted microscope (Thermo Fischer Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Wound Healing Assay with Transduced Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the wound healing assay, EPC2 cells and HaCaT cells transduced with DSP or PPL constructs were simultaneously seeded on a Culture-Insert 4 Well in μ-Dish 35 mm, high ibiTreat (Ibidi USA), grown until confluency. The Culture-Insert 4 Well allows for wound healing assays with four cell-free gaps with a 0.5 mm gap width and one center area with a 1 mm diagonal distance. After removal of the insert, cells were washed three times, incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2, and observed at 8 h or 12 h post wounding. Each wound was imaged at the time of wounding (0 h) and 8 h or 12 h post wounding using an EVOS inverted microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The gap area was quantified using the ImageJ plugin MRI Wound Healing Tool (http://dev.mri.cnrs.fr/projects/imagej-macros/wiki/Wound_Healing_Tool). Percent change in wound area was defined as [100% × (W0-W8)/W0 (W0: wound width at 0 h; W8: wound width at 8 h)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Cellular Assays for Stemness

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For clonogenicity assays, cells were plated in triplicate onto 60‐mm dishes at low density (1,000 cells/dish) and cultured for 8–10 days. Colonies were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. The number and size of colonies were counted by Fiji software.
For sphere‐forming assays, cells were plated onto 8‐well chamber slides (1,000 cells/well) pre‐coated with 80 µl of Matrigel (BD Biosciences) for 1 h at 37°C. After 8 days, slides were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 20 min at RT and images were acquired using EVOS inverted microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Number and size of spheres were counted by Fiji software.
For live‐cell proliferation assays, cells were plated in triplicate at low density (1,000 cells/well) into 96‐well trays. Plates were placed into IncuCyte ZOOM (Sartorius) for 5 days, with pictures and cell density measurements taken every 2–3 h.
5‐Ethynyl‐2′‐deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation assays were performed using Click‐iT Plus EdU Imaging Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s instructions, with nuclear staining by DAPI (Sigma, D9542, 1:1,000 dilution in PBS, 10 min incubation). Fraction of EdU‐positive cells was determined by Fiji software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Mouse Prostate Organoid Isolation and Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse prostate tissue isolation and organoid growth was carried out as described by Drost et al. [25] , with selection of EpCAM positive epithelial cells, as described in detail in the supplementary information. Brightfield and fluorescent organoid images were taken with an EVOS inverted microscope (ThermoFisher Scientific, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cytotoxicity Evaluation of ML-II in Lung Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MTS assay was performed to determine the viability of the A549 and H460 cells treated with ML-II. The cells were incubated in 96-well tissue culture plates (Corning, NY, USA) at a density of 10 × 103 cells/well in 200 µl at 37 °C in a humidified, 5% CO2 atmosphere incubator. After 24 h of incubation, the cells were treated with ML-II or vehicle (PBS) starting at a concentration of 50 µg/mL. The cytotoxic effects were measured after 96 h of incubation. The media were removed and replaced with PBS supplemented with 4.5 g/L glucose, which was followed by the addition of 20 µL of the MTS solution to every well and incubation for 1–4 h at 37 °C [43 (link)]. The production of formazan by live cells was determined by measuring the OD at 490 nm. Cell viability was calculated as follows: % viability = absorbance of treated/absorbance of untreated × 100. In addition, morphological changes were assessed under an EVOS inverted microscope (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!