The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Autocad 2007

Manufactured by Autodesk
Sourced in United States

AutoCAD 2007 is a computer-aided design (CAD) software application developed by Autodesk. It is a versatile tool used for creating and editing 2D and 3D technical drawings, designs, and models. The software provides a range of tools and functionalities for drafting, modeling, and documentation purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using autocad 2007

1

Lateral Cephalometric Analysis Using Digital Radiography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lateral cephalograms were taken at the natural head position with teeth in maximum occlusion and lips in repose using a Planmeca X-ray equipment (Planmeca ProMax®, Helsinki, Finland) with the following specifications: 2.5 mm Al total filtration, 0.5×0.5 mm focal spot size, 60-84 kV anode voltage, 1-16 mA anode current, and 0.2-5 seconds exposure time. The images were digitized using a table scanner (Microtek ScanMaker i800; Microtek International Inc., Carson, CA, USA) at a resolution of 300 dpi, and saved in bitmap format. The scanning process was performed in a 1:1 ratio. The cephalometric analysis was performed digitally by means of the AutoCAD 2007 software (Autodesk Inc., CA, USA). The identification of landmarks was made by two calibrated oral and maxillofacial radiologists, and the angular and linear measurements were recorded to the nearest 0.5° and 0.5 mm, respectively. To calculate the intraexaminer and interexamineres reliability, 10% of the cephalometric radiographs were randomly selected and all the measurements were repeated by both radiologists, one week later.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Retinal Shrinkage during Histology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurements of retinal area were performed just after retinal dissection and in the end of all histological procedures. The results were compared in order to estimate retinal shrinkage. Retinal contours were drawn using a photographic enlarger at ×5 magnification and digitized using a HP Photosmart C5180 multifunctional equipment and the HP Scan and Camera Wizard software (Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, California, USA). Retinal area was then measured using the AutoCAD 2007 software (Autodesk, San Rafael, California, USA).
The positions of the fovea and optic disk center were also marked in the retinal drawings and their distance measured before and after histological procedure. The results were used to estimate if any shrinkage occurred in the central regions of the retina or were restricted to retinal borders and cuts made to obtain the flat mount. In addition, the vertical and horizontal lengths of the optic disk were measured on the microscope using a calibrated eyepiece.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Maxillary and Mandibular Incisor Angulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The inclination of the maxillary incisor to the palatal plane (U1-PP) and mandibular incisor to the mandibular plane (L1-MP) were measured before treatment and near end of treatment by calculating the angle between the long axis of the maxillary central incisors and the maxillary/palatal plane (anterior nasal spineposterior nasal spine) (21) and the angle between the long axis of mandibular central incisors and the mandibular plane (Gonion -Menton) (22, 23) . Every lateral cephalometric radiograph was digitised using the AutoCAD ® 2007 (www.autodesk.co.uk) software program to calculate the angular measurements. The angles were measured directly as they were not affected by magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microfluidic Chip for Cytokine Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The schematic diagram of the device is as shown in Fig. 1A. The device was composed of two layers of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) with several microchambers. The top layer of the chip has one cell culture chamber which was 500 µm in height, 6 mm in width and 11 mm in length and the bottom layer has three microchambers, each of which was 500 µm in height, 2 mm in width and 16 mm in length. Between two pieces of PDMS, there was a polycarbonate membrane (Whatman Inc., Piscataway, NJ, USA), with the pore size of 0.4 µm, which allowed the transition of cytokines and small molecular compounds (19 (link)). Each chamber has one inlet and one outlet, respectively. Perfusion system could be linked with the inlet of each chamber to provide the fluid flow.
Microfluidic chip was fabricated using a conventional microfabrication technique. The mask was designed by AutoCAD 2007 (Autodesk, Inc., San Rafael, CA, USA) and printed on transparencies with 4,000 dpi resolution. The master was fabricated by photoresist SU-8 3035 through soft lithography technique. Then the microfluidic chip was fabricated in PDMS by replicating molding the master, followed by the curing process of PDMS at 80°C in an oven for one hour. After that, PDMS layer was peeled off from the master. A polycarbonate membrane and two pieces of PDMS were sealed together after the treatment by oxygen plasma for 1 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Hallux Angle Comparison of Unshod and Shod Feet

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To abide by the ISO 20685 and 7250 standards, the 3D surface data collected in the test was limited to measuring results of foot length and width, excluding ball perimeter, waist girth perimeter, instep heel perimeter, short heel perimeter, ankle circumference perimeter and skin circumference perimeter. The hallux angle (Figs 1 and 2) is the angle created by the deviation of the hallux away from the tangential line which connects the medial heel with the medial forefoot [35 (link)]. The 2D foot print images (Figs 1 and 2) were collected to calculate hallux angle (HA&HA’) value and the minimal distance (D&D’) between hallux and the second toe with Auto CAD 2007 (Autodesk, America).
All statistical analysis was performed using the software SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) was taken to analyze the significance of length and width difference between habitually unshod (Indian) and shod (Chinese) feet. The LSD (least significance difference) in ANOVA was conducted to analyze the significance of hallux angle and difference between habitually unshod and shod feet. The significant p-value was set at 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Facile Fabrication of Reusable Microfluidic Chip

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microfluidic chip was designed by AutoCAD 2007 (Autodesk, San Rafael, CA, USA, USA); it was laid out on a conventional polymethyl methacrylate substrate (length, 86 mm; width, 43 mm; and depth, 2 mm) by using a computer-controlled CO2 laser machine (LaserPro Venus, GCC, Taiwan) [34 (link),35 (link)]. The microfluidic channel chip shown in Figure 1A comprised three layers: the cover layer (containing 3 inlet ports and 20 screw holes), main layer (containing the cross-junction microchannels and screw holes), and bottom layer (containing one outlet port and screw holes). The three layers were integrated using screws (pitch, 0.5 mm and diameter, 4 mm) to produce a microfluidic chip (Figure 1B). This design of microfluidic chip is similar to the chips reported in our previous studies [36 (link)]. This microfluidic chip was highlighted in the facile fabrication process and disassembly module of screws. Each chip could be reused and cleaned after the tight screws were loosened.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fabrication of Modular Microfluidic Chip

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microfluidic chip was fabricated by using AutoCAD 2007 (Autodesk, USA) and a CO2 laser machine (LaserPro Venus, GCC, Taiwan) for constructing channel patterns on a “poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)” plate (length/width/depth: 270 mm/210 mm/1.5 mm), as described previously.29–32 (link) The microfluidic chip (length/width/depth: 86 mm/50 mm/6 mm) consisted of three PMMA chips, namely the cover chip (with three inlets for sample injection and twenty screw orifices for binding), the middle chip (with a cross-junction channel and twenty screw orifices), and the bottom chip (with an outlet and twenty screw orifices). The three chips were integrated using screws (0.5 mm pitch, 4 mm diameter), as illustrated by ESI Fig. S1. The microfluidic chip could be disassembled for reuse and cleaning by loosening the screws.29–32 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!