The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using cd25 efluor450

1

Characterizing T Cell Subsets in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions were prepared from the thymus, spleen and lymph nodes of busulfan chimeric mice, wildtype control mice, or germ free mice. Cells were stained with the following monoclonal antibodies and cell dyes: CD45.1 FITC, CD45.2 FITC, CD45.2 AlexaFluor700, TCR- β APC, CD4+ PerCP-eFluor710, CD44 APC-eFluor780, CD25 PE, CD25 eFluor450, CD25 PE-Cy7, CD62L eFluor450, NK1.1 PE-Cy7 (all eBioscience), CD45.1 BV650, CD45.2 PE-Dazzle, TCR- β PerCP-Cy5.5 CD4+ BV711, CD44 BV785, CD25 BV650 (all Biolegend), CD62L BUV737 (BD Biosciences), LIVE/DEAD nearIR and LIVE/DEAD blue viability dyes. For Ki67 staining, cells were fixed using the eBioscience Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set and stained with either anti-mouse Ki67 FITC or PE (both eBioscience). Cells were acquired on a BD LSR-II or a BD LSR-Fortessa flow cytometer and analysed with Flowjo software (Treestar). Conventional CD4+ cells were identified as live TCR- β + CD4+ CD25- NK1.1-, and then CD44 and CD62L were used to identify EM (CD44+CD62L-) and CM (CD44+CD62L+) subsets.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flow Cytometric Characterization of T Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions were prepared from the thymus, spleen and lymph nodes (cervical, axillary, brachial, inguinal, and mesenteric) of Ki67-mCherry-CreER Rosa26RYFP double reporter mice. Cells were stained with the following monoclonal antibodies and cell dyes: TCR-β APC, CD4+ PerCP-eFluor710, CD44 APC-eFluor780, CD25 PE, CD25 eFluor450, CD25 PE-Cy7, CD62L eFluor450 (all eBioscience), TCR- β PerCP-Cy5.5 CD4+ BV711, CD44 BV785, CD25 BV650 (all Biolegend), CD62L BUV737 (BD Biosciences), LIVE/DEAD nearIR and LIVE/DEAD blue viability dyes. Cells were acquired on a BD LSR-Fortessa flow cytometer and analyzed with Flowjo software (Treestar). Gating strategy to identify DP, mSP and naive peripheral T cells was identical to that we have employed previously for analysis of mice expressing Ki67-RFP fusion protein (14 (link)). Briefly, DP thymocytes are identified as CD4+CD8+ CRlo CD5lo, CD4 mSP are CD4+CD8CD44loCD25loCD62Lhi, CD8 mSP are CD4CD8+CD44loTCRhiCD62Lhi, peripheral naive CD4+T cells are TCRRhiCD4+CD44loCD62Lhi, and peripheral naive CD8+T cells are TCRhiCD8+CD44loCD62Lhi.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Immunoprofiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following anti-mouse mAbs were used for surface staining during flow cytometry: CD3-eFluor 450, CD8-PerCP-Cy5.5, CD11b-AlexaFluor 700, CD11b-eFluor 450, CD14-FITC, CD25-APC, CD25-eFluor 450, CD45.1-APC, Ly6C-APC-eFluor 780, I-A/E-FITC (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), CD45.1-eFluor 450, CD45R-Horizont V500, CD3-Horizont V500, CD4-Horizont V500, CD4-PerCP, CD8-Horizont V500, Ly6G-AlexaFluor 700, Siglec F-PE (BD Biosciences, San Jose, California, USA) and TLR4-APC (BioLegend, San Diego, Ca, USA). For intracellular staining, the following anti-mouse mAbs were used: TNFα-PE, Foxp3- and IFNγ-PE (eBioscience; San Diego, California, USA). Fc-block (anti-CD16/CD32 mAbs; eBioscience, San Diego, California, USA) was used both in surface and intracellular staining. For ELISA, matched anti-mouse capture mAb and biotinylated detection mAb against TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-12 and IL-6 were used (R&D System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA). Blocking anti-mouse CD25 (PC61.5), CD4 (GK1.5) and anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2) mAbs, as well as anti-mIL-2 mAbs for preparing IL-2 complexes (S4B6, JES6-1A12), were obtained from BioXcell (Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Phenotypic analysis of lymphocyte subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions were prepared from the thymus, spleen and lymph nodes of busulfan chimeric mice, wildtype control mice, or germ-free mice. Cells were stained with the following monoclonal antibodies and cell dyes: CD45.1 FITC, CD45.2 FITC, CD45.2 AlexaFluor700, TCR- β APC, CD4+ PerCP-eFluor710, CD44 APC-eFluor780, CD25 PE, CD25 eFluor450, CD25 PE-Cy7, CD62L eFluor450, NK1.1 PE-Cy7 (all eBioscience), CD45.1 BV650, CD45.2 PE-Dazzle, TCR- β PerCP-Cy5.5 CD4+ BV711, CD44 BV785, CD25 BV650 (all Biolegend), CD62L BUV737 (BD Biosciences), LIVE/DEAD near-IR and LIVE/DEAD blue viability dyes. For Ki67 staining, cells were fixed using the eBioscience Foxp3 /Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set and stained with either anti-mouse Ki67 FITC or PE (both eBioscience). Cells were acquired on a BD LSR-Fortessa flow cytometer and analysed with Flowjo software (Treestar). See Figure 1—figure supplement 1 for the gating strategy used to identify mature single positive thymocytes and peripheral naive subsets, and gates to measure Ki67 frequencies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry of T Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were stained with the following monoclonal antibodies and cell dyes: CD45.1 FITC, CD45.2 AlexaFluor 700, TCR-beta APC, CD4 PerCP-eFluor710, CD25 PE, CD44 APC-eFluor780, CD25 eFluor450, CD62L eFluor450 (all eBioscience), TCR β PerCP-Cy5.5, CD5 BV510, CD4 BV650, CD44 BV785 (all BioLegend), CD62L BUV737 (BD Biosciences), LIVE/DEAD nearIR and LIVE/DEAD Blue viability dyes (Invitrogen). BrdU and Ki67 co-staining was performed using the FITC BrdU Flow Kit (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, along with anti-Ki67 eFluor660 (eBioscience). Cells were acquired on a BD LSR-II or BD LSR-Fortessa flow cytometer and analysed using Flowjo software (Treestar). Subset gates were as follows: CD4 naive: live TCR β + CD5+ CD4+ CD25- CD44- CD62L+. CD4 TEM: live TCR β + CD5+ CD4+ CD25- CD44+ CD62L-. CD4 TCM: live TCR β + CD5+ CD4+ CD25- CD44+ CD62L+.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive B Cell Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For all staining, cells were stained in PBS with 2% FCS for 20 min at 4°C. BD Aria II was used for flow sorting and BD LSRII was used to collect data. For sorted cells, debris and dead cells were excluded using FSC-SSC. Doublets were excluded using both FSC and SSC singlet gating, then CD19+ve B cells isolated. For Figures 1C and 2A, CD4 and CD3 stains were also included to exclude contaminating T cells. Antibodies used were specific for and labeled with CD21-FITC, CD3-PE TxR, CD4-PE, IgM-APC, GM-CSF-PE, IL-10-PE, IL-17-alexa fluor647, IFN-γ-FITC (BD Biosciences); CD11b-BV570, CD11b-PE Cy5, CD19-PE, CD19-BV605, CD1d-PerCP Cy5.5, CD21/35-APC, CD23-PE, CD23-alexa fluor 647, CD23-PE Cy7, CD3-FITC, CD3 PE/Dazzle 594, CD38-PE, CD4-PE, CD4-BV605, CD40-PE Cy7, CD43-FITC, CD43-APC, CD5-PE Cy5, CD80-PerCP Cy5.5, CD86-BV421, TIM1-PE, TNFα-BV605 (Biolegend); CD21/35-APC efluor780, CD24-APC efluor780, CD25-efluor450, CD9-APC, DO11.10 TCR-Biotin, IgD-efluor450, MHCII-PE Cy5, CD19-eFluor450, F4/80-APC, IFN-γ-PE Cy7, streptavidin-PE (eBioscience); IgM-TxR, IgM-alexa fluor647 (Southern Biotech); IgM-alexa488, cell tracker green (Molecular Probes), and CFSE (fluka). All analysis was performed using FlowJo Software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunophenotyping Lymphocyte Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions were prepared from the thymus, spleen and lymph nodes of busulfan chimeric mice, wildtype control mice, or germ free mice. Cells were stained with the following monoclonal antibodies and cell dyes: CD45.1 FITC, CD45.2 FITC, CD45.2 AlexaFluor700, TCR-β APC, CD4 + PerCP-eFluor710, CD44 APC-eFluor780, CD25 PE, CD25 eFluor450, CD25 PE-Cy7, CD62L eFluor450, NK1.1 PE-Cy7 (all eBioscience), CD45.1 BV650, CD45.2 PE-Dazzle, TCR-β PerCP-Cy5.5 CD4 + BV711, CD44 BV785, CD25 BV650 (all Biolegend), CD62L BUV737 (BD Biosciences), LIVE/DEAD nearIR and LIVE/DEAD blue viability dyes. For Ki67 staining, cells were fixed using the eBioscience Foxp3/ Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set and stained with either anti-mouse Ki67 FITC or PE (both eBioscience). Cells were acquired on a BD LSR-Fortessa flow cytometer and analysed with Flowjo software (Treestar). See Figure S1 for the gating strategy used to identify mature single positive thymocytes and peripheral naive subsets, and gates to measure Ki67 frequencies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!