The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Control rabbit igg

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United Kingdom

Control rabbit IgG is a laboratory reagent used as a control in immunoassays and other immunological experiments. It is a purified preparation of rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) that serves as a reference or comparison sample to ensure the reliability and accuracy of experimental results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

16 protocols using control rabbit igg

1

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis of CPE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell extract (~1 mg protein) prepared in TNE buffer (Tris 50 mM, NaCl 150 mM, EDTA 5 mM, pH 7.4) containing 1% NP-40 and 1X protease inhibitor cocktail, were incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-CPE antibody 6135 (7µg, generated in our laboratory) or control rabbit IgG (7 µg, Invitrogen) overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with Protein A/G PLUS-Agarose beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) for 2 h. After thorough washing with lysis buffer to remove the non-specific binding, the protein-antibody complex was eluted from the beads by boiling in SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) protein gel loading solution (Quality Biological, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Equal volumes of eluate were analyzed by Western blot using anti-CPE mouse monoclonal antibody (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation for GATA2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were performed using a ChIP Assay Kit (Upstate, Lake Placid, NY) with anti-GATA2 Ab (H-116, sc-9008), anti–acetyl histone H4 Ab (06–866), or control rabbit IgG (02–6102; Invitrogen) as previously described (19 (link)). The amount of chromosomal DNA was determined by quantitative PCR. The following synthesized oligonucleotides were used as primers for PCR: the Mcpt1 promoter −3300/−3230 (forward primer; 5′-CTGGACTGATGTTGAGAACTGATAGAC-3′, and reverse primer; 5′-CCGGGATGCTGATCCTATGA-3′), −127/−58 (forward primer; 5′-CCACCAGTGGTCAGAGTATGAGAA-3′, and reverse primer; 5′-GAACCACAGATCTGGCTTGGA-3′), the Mcpt2 promoter −3492/−3422 (forward primer; 5′-CCCAACAGCTTACCAGATATAAGAAA-3′, and reverse primer; 5′-TCAGCCCAGCCTCATCAG-3′) −61/+11 (forward primer; 5′-CACAGACTCAACACCACCAGAGA-3′, and reverse primer; 5′-TCTGGTTTGGACAAGCTCTACTTTC-3′).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analyzing Phosphorylation of c-Met and EGFR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the phosphorylation of c-Met and EGFR in vivo, immunocompetent mice were infected with the various C. albicans strains as described above. After 1-d of infection, the mice were sacrificed, and the tongues were excised, snap frozen, and embedded into OTC. Thin sections were prepared and transferred to glass slides. The samples were air dried, fixed in 100% methanol, rinsed, and then blocked with 5% goat serum in PBS. The slides were incubated with a rabbit anti-phospho-c-MET antibody (Tyr1003, #MBS9600900, My Biosource Inc.) or control rabbit IgG (#026102, Invitrogen) followed an Alexa Fluor 568conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody. The C. albicans cells were labeled with an anti-Candida antibody conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 and the nuclei were labeled with DAPI. Phosphorylated EGFR was detected similarly, except that the slides were incubated with an anti-rabbit phosho-EGFR conjugated with phycoerythrin (Tyr1068, #14565, Cell Signaling Technologies) and control slides were stained with rabbit IgG conjugated with phycoerthrin (#5742, Cell Signaling Technologies). The slides were imaged by confocal microscopy, and z-stacks were combined using LAS X software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

FGFR-Fc Binding Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Maxisorp™ EIA plates (Thermo Scientific) were coated with 0.5 μg/ml goat anti-human IgG-Fc (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) in PBS at 4 °C overnight. Thereafter the plate was blocked with 2 % bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h. Recombinant human FGFRs-Fc (R&D systems) (500 ng/ml) or the control human IgG-Fc (Abcam) was then added for 2 h, followed by incubation with IMB-R1 or the control rabbit IgG (Invitrogen) at the indicated doses for 1 h. The bound antibodies were detected with 0.5 μg/ml HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) and visualized with TMB substrate (Thermo Scientific). The color was read at 450 nm using the Victor3 multilabel plate reader (PerkinElmer). All reactions were performed at room temperature, unless indicated otherwise, and protected from light, with each step followed by extensive washing in blocking buffer. The readings were normalized against the controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing (ChIP-Seq)

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were performed as previously described (Forsberg et al, 2000; Wilson et al, 2010) using antibodies against total STAT5 (Santa Cruz, sc835), ERG (Santa Cruz, sc354x), CTCF (Millipore, 07‐592), and control rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, 9172). ChIP DNA samples were amplified for sequencing with the Illumina Chip‐Seq Sample Prep Kit (Illumina) and sequenced with the Illumina GA2 Genome Analyser platform. The ChIP‐Seq data from this study have been submitted to the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE70697.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Candida Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the phosphorylation of c-Met and EGFR in vivo, immunocompetent mice were infected with the various C. albicans strains as described above. After 1-d of infection, the mice were sacrificed, and the tongues were excised, snap frozen, and embedded into OTC. Thin sections were prepared and transferred to glass slides. The samples were air dried, fixed in 100% methanol, rinsed, and then blocked with 5% goat serum in PBS. The slides were incubated with a rabbit anti-phospho-c-MET antibody (Tyr1003, #MBS9600900, My Biosource Inc.) or control rabbit IgG (#026102, Invitrogen) followed an Alexa Fluor 568-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody. The C. albicans cells were labeled with an anti-Candida antibody conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 and the nuclei were labeled with DAPI. Phosphorylated EGFR was detected similarly, except that the slides were incubated with an anti-rabbit phosho-EGFR conjugated with phycoerythrin (Tyr1068, #14565, Cell Signaling Technologies) and control slides were stained with rabbit IgG conjugated with phycoerthrin (#5742, Cell Signaling Technologies). The slides were imaged by confocal microscopy, and z-stacks were combined using LAS X software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

RNA-Binding Protein Immunoprecipitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RIP experiments were performed by using the Magna RIP RNA-Binding Protein Immunoprecipitation Kit (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Approximately 107 cells were pelleted and re-suspended with an equal pellet volume of RIP Lysis Buffer (about 100 μl) plus protease and RNase inhibitors. The cell lysates (100 μl) were incubated with 5 μg of AGO2 (Cell signaling technologies, #2897), MSH2 (ab70270, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), or control Rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #31235) coated beads with rotation at 4 °C overnight, respectively. After treating with proteinase K, the immunoprecipitated RNAs were extracted by RNeasy MinElute Cleanup Kit (Qiagen) and reversely transcripted using PrimeScript RT Master Mix (TaKaRa).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Identifying NRF2 Interacting Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A549 cells were harvested using a cell scraper and washed three times in 1x PBS. The cell pellet was resuspended in 1x PBS containing 0.5 mM DTME and 0.5 mM DSP and incubated at room temperature for 30 min, followed by incubation in quenching buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM cysteine) at 25 °C for 5 min. After washing in ice-cold PBS, the pellet was sonicated in RIPA buffer briefly and centrifuged at 14,000 × g at 4 °C for 5 min. The supernatant was subjected to anti-NRF2 affinity purification. An anti-NRF2 antibody (#12721, Cell Signaling Technology) and control rabbit IgG (#55944, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were crosslinked to a 1:1 mixture of Dynabeads protein A and protein G (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with DMP and incubated with the supernatant at 4 °C for 2 h. After washing in RIPA buffer, the NRF2 complex was eluted from the beads by incubation in elution buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.2 M NaCl, 2 w/v% SDS, 50 mM DTT) at 37 °C for 30 min. The eluate was analyzed by immunoblot analysis with anti-NRF2 antibody (sc-13032X, Santa Cruz; 1:1,000), anti-FOSL2 antibody (#19967S, Cell Signaling Technology; 1:1,000), and anti-CEBPB antibody (sc-150 X, Santa Cruz; 1:1,000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

ChIP-qPCR Workflow for PU.1 and FLAG Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP was performed using anti-PU.1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-FLAG (Sigma-Aldrich), control rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and control mouse IgG antibodies (eBioscience) as previously described (Ochiai et al., 2013 (link)). In brief, DNA from 5 × 106 cells was cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature Reaction was stopped with 125 µM Glycine. Cells were lysed with NP-40 and nuclei were frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then lysed with SDS. DNA was sonicated with 30-s pulses for 60–90 cycles. DNA fragmentation was in the range of 0.5–1 kb and was monitored by agarose gel electrophoresis. Immunoprecipitation was performed with 1 µg of anti-PU.1 (polyclonal; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or control rabbit IgG (sc-2027) and protein A–Sepharose beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For FLAG ChIP, 2 µg of anti-FLAG (clone M2; Sigma-Aldrich) or control mouse IgG (clone P3.6.2.8.1; eBioscience) was first incubated with rabbit anti-mouse IgG (EMD Millipore) and immunoprecipitation was performed with Protein A Dynabeads (Life Technologies). DNA was purified with QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN). Quantitative PCR was performed using Brilliant II SYBR Green (Agilent) and acquired on an Mx3000P (Stratagene). Primers are listed in Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating hSeP and mFHR Antibody Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As described in Supplementary Fig. 4a, 9-week-old female C57BL/6J mice were injected twice with purified hSeP protein (1 mg/kg intraperitoneally ip)16 (link). Control mice were injected ip with an identical volume of PBS (vehicle control). Treatment hSeP was made 12 and 2 h before tolerance tests or tissue sampling. Tissue samples were taken for western blotting after perfusion with saline. AE2 mAb (rat IgG1) and control IgG (20 mg/kg body weight) were administered 2 h before the first injection of SeP. Control rat IgG1 mAb (R&D systems) was used as a control.
Mouse models of diabetes were treated as described in Supplementary Fig. 8a. Nine-week-old male KKAy mice or 9-week-old male C57BL/6J mice fed HFHSD for 11 weeks were injected ip with mFHR pAb and Control rabbit IgG (25 mg/kg body weight), and then underwent a glucose tolerance test (24 h after Ab injection), insulin tolerance test (48 h after Ab injection) and had tissue sampling (72 h after Ab injection). Control rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used as a control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!