The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using agilent 6530 accurate mass q tof mass spectrometer

1

Serum Metabolomics Analysis by LC-QTOF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The metabolomics analysis was performed with an Agilent 1290 Infinity LC system coupled to an Agilent 6530 Accurate-mass Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, United States). Chromatographic separation of serum samples was performed on an Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 threaded column (2.1 × 150 mm, 1.8 µm, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, United States) maintained at 35°C. The mobile phase consisted of solvent A (0.1% formic acid in water, v/v) and B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile, v/v). The optimized gradient program was established. The post time was set to 3 min for equilibration. Mass spectrometry was performed in both positive (ESI+) and negative (ESI-) electrospray ionization modes. The fragment voltage was set to 135 V and the skimmer voltage was set to 65 V. The capillary voltages were set to 4.0 KV in positive mode and 3.5 KV in negative mode. The drying gas (nitrogen) was used at a flow rate of 10 L/min at 350°C and the nebulizer pressure was set to 45 psig. Data were collected in centroid mode from 50 to 1000 m/z using an extended dynamic model.
Serum samples were analyzed in random order during the analysis. In addition, QC samples were detected once every 6 subject samples for conditioning of the analytical system, signal correction, and quality assurance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPLC-QTOF Analysis of Unknown Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples
were reconstituted in 100 μL of Nanopure water prior to analytical
separation, which was carried out using an Agilent 1260 Infinity II
HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Chromatographic
separation was performed on a 150 mm × 1 mm Hypercarb column
from Thermo Scientific (5 μm particle size). The column compartment
was set at 40 °C. A binary gradient was employed and consisted
of solvent A: (3% (v/v) ACN, 0.1% FA in water) and solvent B: (90%
ACN, 0.1% FA in water). A 45 min gradient with a flow rate of 0.132
mL/min was used: 3–25% B, 0–15 min; 25–25% B,
15–18 min; 25–99% B, 18–30 min; 99–99%B,
30–32 min; 99–3% B, 32–34 min; 3–3% B,
34–45 min.
HPLC was coupled to Agilent 6530 Accurate-Mass
Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
The MS detector was run in the positive mode with the following electrospray
source parameters: drying gas temperature = 150 °C. drying gas
flow rate = 11 L/min, fragmentor = 175 V, skimmer = 60 V, octupole
1 RF = 750 V. Acquisition mode was set to data-dependent mode, where
top 5 most abundant precursor ions were selected for fragmentation.
Dynamic exclusion was enabled for 30 s. The acquisition rate was set
to 0.63 spectra/s. For tandem MS fragmentation, a linear function
for collision energy (CE), where CE = 1.45*(m/z)-3.5, was employed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Spectroscopic Characterization of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical rotations were measured on a JASCO P-2000 polarimeter (JASCO Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), UV/Vis data were obtained using a Beckman DU800 spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), and IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet 100 FT-IR spectrometer (Nicolet, Madison, WI, USA). NMR data were obtained on a Bruker AVANCE III 600 MHz NMR with a 1.7 mm dual tune TCI cryoprobe (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) and the 1D TOCSY experiments were performed on a JEOL ECZ 500 NMR spectrometer equipped with a 3 mm inverse probe (H3X) (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Data were recorded in either pyridine-d5 or methanol-d4 and adjusted to the residual solvent peak (pyridine-d5 δH 7.22, δC 123.87; methanol-d4 δH 3.31, δC 49.00). Deuterated NMR solvents were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Tewksbury, MA, USA). For high resolution electrospray mass spectrometric analysis (HR–ESI–MS), an Agilent 6530 Accurate Mass QTOF mass spectrometer was used in the positive ion mode (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Semi-preparative HPLC was performed on a Thermo Fisher Scientific HPLC system with a Thermo Dionex UltiMate 3000 pump, RS autosampler, RS diode array detector, and automated fraction collector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). All solvents were HPLC grade except for water, which was purified by a Millipore Milli-Q system before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Accurate-Mass Q-TOF HPLC-MS/MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed on an Agilent 6530 Accurate-Mass Q-TOF mass spectrometer interfaced with an Agilent 1260 Series Capillary HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Samples were injected with a volume of 5μL and chromatographic separation was carried out on a Jupiter C18 column (150 × 1.00mm, 5μ) at 50 μL/min for MS and a Zorbax SB-C18 column (150 × 0.5mm, 5μ) at 15 μL/min for MS/MS. Mobile phase A (UHPLC grade H20, 0.1% FA) and mobile phase B (UHPLC grade ACN, 0.1% FA) were used in the following gradient for MS (A : B): 0 min (97 : 3)→5 min (97:3) →20 min (50 : 50)→30 min (50 : 50)→35 min (97 : 3). The following gradient was used for MSMS (A : B): 0 min (97 : 3)→1 min (97:3) →10 min (40 : 60)→13 min (5 : 95)→17 min (5 : 95)→17.01 min (97 : 3)→30 min (97 : 3). Samples were analyzed in positive mode with dual Agilent jet stream electrospray ionization. Data were collected and analyzed on MassHunter software (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA.) and visualized with GraphPad Prism (GraphPAD Software, San Diego, CA). Chromatograms presented are representative of at least three trials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Serum Metabolomic Profiling by UHPLC-Q-TOFMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A global serum metabolic profiling based on UHPLC-Q-TOFMS was conducted with 100ul serum samples by using Agilent 1290 Infinity LC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled with an Agilent 6530 Accurate-Mass-Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Quality control (QC) samples were aliquots of a pooled sample of the whole sample set and were evenly distributed in real sequence to assess the stability of the LC-MS technique [14 (link)]. All analyses were acquired using a mixture of 10 mM purine and 2 mM hexakis phosphazene as internal standards to ensure mass accuracy and reproducibility. The other detailed LC–MS protocols could be found from a previously published paper [15 (link)]. Metabolite peaks were identified by referring to open-access databases METLIN (http://metlin.scripps.edu) and HMDB (http://www.hmdb.ca) or related literature within a mass accuracy of 30 ppm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!