The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

232 protocols using typhoon phosphorimager

1

Quantitative Analysis of 14-3-3 Phosphorylation by PKA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Substrate 14-3-3 (0.5 μg of purified recombinant 14-3-3) was added to 15 μl of reaction mixture comprising 0.2U of the PKA catalytic subunit, in the presence or absence of compounds (delivered in 0.1% v/v ethanol) in PKA reaction buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 15 mM MgCl2, 3 mM DTT containing 25 μM ATP and 0.3 μCi [32P] γ-ATP). Reactions were incubated at 37°C for 15 min. After incubation, reactions were separated on 12.5% SDS-PAGE and Coomassie stained. 14-3-3 phosphorylation was analyzed using a Typhoon Phosphorimager and quantified using Molecular Dynamics Image Q 5.2 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Northern Blot Analysis of Viral and Cellular RNAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted with the RNeasy kit (Qiagen). Ten micrograms (infected cells) or 2 μg (transiently transfected cells) of RNA was separated on a 1.2% formaldehyde-agarose gel and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes were first hybridized to [α-32P]dCTP-labeled mCherry, PPP1R12C (exons 18 to 22), rep, or GFP probes; stripped at 65°C in 50% formamide, 2× SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate); and rehybridized to a β-actin cDNA probe. The PPP1R12C and β-actin cDNA probes were generated as described by Dutheil et al. (27 (link)). The mCherry and GFP cDNA probes were generated by PCR using the primers mentioned above. The rep probe was generated by PCR on a plasmid containing a 315-bp PstI/SacI fragment from pAV2 using 5′-GGATCCTCAATTCTGATTCTCTTTG-3′ and 5′-CCCGGGGGTCCTGTATTAGAGGTCACGTG-3′. All Northern blots were analyzed with a Typhoon PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics) and then exposed to an X-ray film to generate high-quality images. ImageQuant TL software was used to calculate fold repression. Each average repression level is represented as the mean and standard error of the mean (SEM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Vitro Transcription and Splicing Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PY7-FGB substrates were transcribed using the MAXIscript kit (Ambion) with BamHI-linearized plasmids as templates. In vitro transcription reaction contained 1x transcription buffer, 1 μg of linear DNA, 60 μCi of [α-32P]UTP or [α-32P]CTP (800 Ci/mmol, PerkinElmer), 0.5 mM ATP, 0.5 mM CTP or 0.5 mM of UTP, 0.1 mM GTP, 0.4 mM m7G(5′)ppp(5′)G, 1 U/μL of ribonuclease inhibitor (Promega), and 2U/μL of SP6 RNA polymerase. Transcription reactions were incubated at 37°C for 1 and 3 hrs. Internally labeled transcripts were gel purified using PAGE.
Each splicing reaction contained 0.1 nM of RNA (∼10ng), 30% of HeLa nuclear extract (4C Biotech), 1 mM DTT, 60 mM KCl, 12 mM Hepes–KOH, pH 7.9, 0.5 mM ATP, 20 mM creatine phosphate, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.25 U/μL of ribonuclease inhibitor, and 2.6 % of polyvinylalcohol. Following incubation at 30°C for 2 hours, 100-μL splicing reactions were digested with proteinase K (100 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 1% SDS, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 0.05 μg/μl tRNA, and 0.25 mg/mL proteinase K) at 37°C for 15 min, extracted with phenol and chloroform, precipitated with ethanol and separated using PAGE. Gels were dried and exposed to a Typhoon PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mapping DSB Hotspots via Southern Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CCT6 locus was chosen because it is the strongest Spo11‐induced DSB hotspot in the synthetic region (Pan et al, 2011). Cells were harvested and DNA was extracted as described (Oh et al, 2009), except that no cross‐linking step was performed. The DNA was digested with NdeI and XbaI (New England Biolabs), migrated on a 1% UltraPure Agarose (Invitrogen) 1× TAE for 15 h at 70 V, and capillary transferred onto a Hybond‐XL membrane (GE Healthcare) following the manufacturer's instructions. Southern blot hybridization was performed at 65°C in Church buffer (1% BSA, 0.25 M Na2HPO4 pH 7.3, 7% SDS, 1 mM EDTA) with a 1,104‐bp‐long radiolabeled probe corresponding to the rightmost region common to both the native and the Syn‐HiC restriction fragments (obtained from SK1 genomic DNA with primers 5′‐TGGTGAAGAACTCAGGATTC‐3′ and 5′‐CAGTTACAATGAAGTCCAGG‐3′) and radiolabeled phage lambda DNA (molecular ladder). Radiolabeling was performed with 32P‐αdCTP with the High Prime labeling kit (Roche) following the manufacturer's instructions. The membrane was washed and exposed overnight, and the storage Phosphor Screen (GE Healthcare) was scanned on a Typhoon PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics). The length of the native and Syn‐HiC parental fragments is 5,135 and 6,157 bp, respectively. CO formation generates two recombinants of 4,453 and 6,839 bp. Quantifications were performed with ImageJ 1.49v.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In Vitro Radioactive U1 and U7 snRNP Assembly

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Radioactive U1 and U7 snRNAs were generated by run-off transcription with T7 polymerase from linearized plasmid DNA templates in the presence of m7G cap analog (Promega) using the MEGAshortscript T7 kit (Invitrogen) as previously described (Gabanella et al., 2005 (link), 2007 (link); Tisdale et al., 2013 (link)). Cell and tissue extracts were prepared in ice-cold reconstitution buffer (20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol) containing 0.01% NP-40 and in vitro snRNP assembly reactions were carried out for 1 h at 30°C as previously described (Gabanella et al., 2005 (link), 2007 (link); Tisdale et al., 2013 (link)). Following treatment with heparin sulfate (5 mg/mL) and 2 M urea for 15 min at room temperature, reactions were immunoprecipitated with anti-SmB (18F6) antibodies for 2 h at 4°C in RSB-500 buffer (500 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 2.5 mM MgCl2) containing 0.1% NP40, protease inhibitors (Pierce/Thermo Scientific), and phosphatase inhibitors (PhosSTOP; Roche/Sigma-Aldrich). Following antibody conjugation, beads were washed 5 times in RSB-500 buffer. Immunoprecipitated snRNAs were analyzed by electrophoresis on a denaturing 8% polyacrylamide gel containing 8 M urea followed by autoradiography. Quantification was done using a Typhoon PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

In Vitro Self-Cleavage Kinetics of Ribozyme

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro self-cleavage reactions were performed as follows. Separate solutions of the PAGE-purified 32P-labeled ribozyme (6 μL) and a physiological-like MgCl2 buffer (25 μL of 140 mM KCl, 10 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) were pre-incubated at 37 °C. A zero timepoint was collected by taking 1 μL of the ribozyme solution and immediately quenching prior to addition of any magnesium by adding it to 6 μL of denaturing quench buffer (8 M urea, 20 mM EDTA, with 0.05% xylene cyanol, 0.1% bromophenol blue, and 1 mM Tris, pH 7.5). Folding and self-cleaving reactions were initiated by adding the ribozyme (5 μL) to the reaction buffer (25 μL). Aliquots (3 μL) taken at different time points were quenched with 6 μL of the denaturing quench buffer. The reactions were then fractionated using 7.5% PAGE. The resulting gels were exposed to phosphorimage screens (Molecular Dynamics) and analyzed by using a Typhoon phosphorimager. ImageQuant software (GE Healthcare) was used to measure observed band intensities to derive the population of each fragment size at a given timepoint. These data were used to model the progress of the initiated cleavage reaction over time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In Vitro Radioactive U1 and U7 snRNP Assembly

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Radioactive U1 and U7 snRNAs were generated by run-off transcription with T7 polymerase from linearized plasmid DNA templates in the presence of m7G cap analog (Promega) using the MEGAshortscript T7 kit (Invitrogen) as previously described (Gabanella et al., 2005 (link), 2007 (link); Tisdale et al., 2013 (link)). Cell and tissue extracts were prepared in ice-cold reconstitution buffer (20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol) containing 0.01% NP-40 and in vitro snRNP assembly reactions were carried out for 1 h at 30°C as previously described (Gabanella et al., 2005 (link), 2007 (link); Tisdale et al., 2013 (link)). Following treatment with heparin sulfate (5 mg/mL) and 2 M urea for 15 min at room temperature, reactions were immunoprecipitated with anti-SmB (18F6) antibodies for 2 h at 4°C in RSB-500 buffer (500 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 2.5 mM MgCl2) containing 0.1% NP40, protease inhibitors (Pierce/Thermo Scientific), and phosphatase inhibitors (PhosSTOP; Roche/Sigma-Aldrich). Following antibody conjugation, beads were washed 5 times in RSB-500 buffer. Immunoprecipitated snRNAs were analyzed by electrophoresis on a denaturing 8% polyacrylamide gel containing 8 M urea followed by autoradiography. Quantification was done using a Typhoon PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Footprinting Triplex DNA-Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TFO binding was determined by footprinting the 73-mer DNA fragment shown in Supplementary Figure S1f. This was performed by mixing 1.5 μl radiolabelled DNA with 3 μl TFO dissolved in either 50 mM sodium acetate containing 10 mM MgCl2 at pH 5.0, or 40 mM tris acetate containing 10 mM MgCl2 at pH 7.5. Final TFO concentrations varied between 0.03 and 30 μM and the complexes were left to equilibrate overnight at 20°C. DNase I digestion was carried out by adding 2 μl DNase I (typically 0.01 U/ml) dissolved in 20 mM NaCl containing 2 mM MgCl2 and 2 mM MnCl2. The reaction was stopped after 1 min by adding 4 μl of 80% formamide containing 10 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaOH and 0.1% (w/v) bromophenol blue. Products of digestion were separated on 12% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels containing 8 M urea. Samples were heated to 100°C for 3 min, before rapidly cooling on ice and loading onto the gel. Polyacrylamide gels (40 cm long and 0.3 mm thick) were run at 1500 V for ∼2 h and then fixed in 10% (v/v) acetic acid. These were transferred to Whatman 3MM paper and dried under vacuum at 86°C for 1 h. The dried gels were subjected to phosphorimaging using a Molecular Dynamics Typhoon PhosphorImager.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Thioglycolate-elicited Macrophage Stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macrophages were elicited into the peritoneal cavity by 2% thioglycolate broth treatment as described53 and stimulated essentially as described above. Ultrapure LPS from Salmonella minnesota R595 (InvivoGen) was used at 100 ng/ml. For the experiments described in Fig. 5h thioglycolate-elicited macrophages (2 × 106) were stimulated for either 3.5 or eight h with CpG-containing stimuli 2216-3′-biotin at 5 μM. Cells were washed twice with cold PBS before cell lysis with 0.5% NP40, 150 mM NaCl and 1 mM EDTA. Nuclei and cell debris were removed by centrifugation and the supernatant was incubated with 20 μl streptavidin magnetic beads (Invitrogen) for 40 min at 4°C with rotation. Beads were isolated using a magnet, washed twice with lysis buffer, and twice with T4 Polynucleotide Kinase (PNK) buffer (NEB). Bound DNA was labeled with γ32P-ATP (Perkin Elmer) with PNK for 30 min at 37°C and beads were washed twice with lysis buffer. Labeled DNA was then eluted with 95% formamide, 10 mM EDTA, heated to 70°C for 10 min and loaded onto 20% TBE/Urea Acrylamide gels. Radiolabeled DNA was exposed to a phosphorimager screen and the signal visualized using a Molecular Dynamics Typhoon phosphorimager and quantitated using ImageQuant software. In some cases, bone marrow derived macrophages were grown in 20% L929 supernatant containing medium over 7 days and stimulated as above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Phosphorylation Kinetics of Sln1-Ypd1-Ssk1 Signaling Pathway

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Sln1-HK domain bound to glutathione-Sepharose 4B resin was phosphorylated via incubation with 0.66 μM [γ-32P]-ATP (3000 Ci/mmol) for 30 min according to previously published protocols [19 (link)]. Unincorporated [γ-32P]-ATP was washed from phospho-Sln1-HK with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM KCl, 15 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, and 20% glycerol by three consecutive centrifugations (1 min at 1000 g). Sln1-R1 was added to the reaction and incubated for 5 min with phospho-Sln1-HK. Sln1-HK was removed from the reaction through gentle centrifugation, leaving only phosphorylated Sln1-R1 in solution. Phospho-Sln1-R1 was then used as a donor to phosphorylate all Ypd1 proteins. Ypd1 proteins were phosphorylated by incubation with an equimolar concentration of Sln1-R1 for 5 min. To test the ability of the Ypd1-G68X mutants to transfer the phosphoryl group to downstream binding partners, Ypd1~P was incubated with an equimolar concentration of Ssk1-R2 and an aliquot was obtained at 5 min. The reaction was quenched with stop buffer containing EDTA and samples were separated on a 15% SDS polyacrylamide gel and electrophoresed at 200 V for 45 min for visualization. The SDS gels were wrapped in plastic wrap and exposed to a phosphorimager screen. The radioactivity of each band was quantified using a Typhoon phosphorimager (Molecular Dynamics). Band intensities were quantified using ImageJ [71 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!