The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Axis his

Manufactured by Shimadzu
Sourced in United Kingdom

AXIS-His is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system designed for the separation and analysis of biomolecules. It features a high-precision solvent delivery module, a temperature-controlled column compartment, and a sensitive ultraviolet (UV) or diode array detector. The AXIS-His is a versatile instrument suitable for a wide range of applications in the life sciences and pharmaceutical industries.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using axis his

1

Comprehensive Material Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). A field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM 15 kV, JEOL, JSM-6700F, Tokyo, Japan).
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS, AXIS-HIS, Kratos Analytical, Hadano, Japan). The Photoemission Endstation at the BL10B beamline in the National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (NSRL) in Hefei, China.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM). A field emission transmission electron microscope (TEM 200 kV, JEOL, JEM-2100F, Tokyo, Japan).
X-ray Diffraction (XRD, Japanese Rigaku Company, Tokyo, Japan). A D8-Advance power diffractometer with a Cu-Kα radiation source (λ = 1.54178 Å).
Raman Spectra. A Horiba microscopic Raman spectrometer (XploRA, HORIBA, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The laser having wavelength 532 nm (~2.5 mW/cm2) over a range of 70–3000 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of MoS2 Quantum Dots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies and size of MoS2 QDs samples were characterized by TEM (FE-TEM; JEOL JEM-2100F, Japan). Nanoparticle sizes were determined by measuring no <200 randomly selected nanoparticles from TEM micrographs with ImageJ (http: //rsbweb.nib.gov/ij/). The powder XRD measurements were performed using a Bruker D8 advanced diffractometer with a Cu Ka irradiation in the 2θ range of 200-600. The elemental composition and binding energy of the sample were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; AXIS HIS, Kratos Analytical). The absorbance spectrum scanning and fluorescence intensities were conducted using microplate reader (BioTEK H4FM, USA). Fluorescence imaging were taken with inverted fluorescence microscope (Leica DMI6000, Germany) and the phase contrast images were captured by inverted microscope (Olympus-CX41, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nanomaterial Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A JEOL 6700 was used to obtain field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) images. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM) images were achieved with a JEOL JEM-200CX and JEOL-3010, respectively. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra were obtained using the M18XHF SRA (MAC Science Co.) and AXIS-HIS (KRATOS) systems.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Nanostructure Surface

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface structural changes of the samples were examined using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, SUPRA/AURIGA, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) for 5000 and 20,000 magnification using High Resolution Digital Image Processing and Analysis System. To impart conductivity, the surface was coated with 20 nm thick platinum using a coating machine (Ion Sputter Coater, G20, GSEM, Suwon, Korea). Atomic force microscopy (AFM, NX-10, Park Systems, Suwon, Korea) was carried out to quantitatively analyze the nanostructures based on plasma etching. The nanoroughness was measured in the section of 3 μm × 3 μm of the specimen. Then, the range of 1 μm × 1 μm was randomly selected and the values of Ra and Rq were calculated by XEI software. Kawabata surface roughness meter (KES-FB4-A Surface Tester, Kato Tech Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) was used to assess the microroughness of the fabric and film based on their weave density. To analyze the changes in the surface components based on plasma etching and thermal aging, the changes in the carbon and oxygen composition up to 10 nm of the surface were analyzed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (AXIS-his, Kratos Analytical, Manchester, UK). The crystallinity and immunoreactivity were measured by X-ray diffractometers (New D8 Advance and D8 Discover, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fabric Surface Characterization via FE-SEM and EDS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphologies of fabric samples were analyzed with Field-Emission Scanning Electronic Microscopy (FE-SEM; AURIGA, Carl Zeiss, Germany), and the chemical composition changes were analyzed with Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS; XFlash® FlatQUAD 5060F, Bruker, Germany). Prior to FE-SEM and EDS analysis, the sample surface was coated with platinum at 30 mA for 200 s using a sputter coater (EM ACE200, Leica, Austria). The average diameter of the metal nanoparticles treated with the sample was measured at a 30 000× magnification with FE-SEM. For measurement of particle diameters, five SEM images from different locations were used and from each image, ten non-aggregated nanoparticles were randomly chosen for measurement, and the length of the longest part in particle was measured as diameter of particles assuming them to be spherical. An X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS, AXIS-His, KRATOS, UK) analysis was conducted to confirm changes in surface chemical compositions of the samples with metal nanoparticle treatment and hydrophobic coating.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Modified Titanium Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, AXIS His, Kratos Analytical Ltd., UK) was used to identify the chemical constituents of pristine and variously modified Ti surfaces. After immersed in 5 ml of PBS solution for 7days, the sample of Ti-PTL-HA-CS was determined by XPS to identify the chemical composition.
The contact angles of deionized water on the pristine and modified Ti surfaces were measured by the sessile drop method in a goniometer equipped with the drop-shape analysis system (JC2000D1, Micaren, China) at room temperature. Each Ti disc was measured three times to calculate the mean values of the contact angles.
The surface morphology of the pristine and decorated Ti was characterized by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, JSM-5600LV, JEOL, Japan) with a beam voltage of 15kV. All the samples were sputter-coated by gold before SEM observation except for the Ti discs modified with CS/AgNP. The chemical composition of the surface of the CS/AgNP discs was identified by energy dispersive X-ray detector (EDX, Japan).
The size and morphology of the Ag nanoparticles was observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Philips CM20).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Synthesized Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies of the synthesized nanoparticles were analyzed through EF-TEM (LIBRA 120, Carl Zeiss, Germany), SEM (SUPRA 55VP, Carl Zeiss, Germany), and XPS (AXIS-His, Kratos, UK). The UV-visible extinction spectra of the mixture solution and all concentrations of dopamine were obtained using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Evolution One Plus, Thermo Fischer Scientific, USA). The SERS performance of metal-chelated nanoshells was obtained with a Raman system (LabRAM 300, HORIBA, Japan) with a 660 nm laser with 2.5 mW power. The acquisition time was 60 s with the use of multi-window and an ×10 lens.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Characterization of Li Electrodeposition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FE-SEM images were acquired using a JSM-7600F instrument (JEOL, Japan). XPS results were recorded on an AXIS-His (KRATOS, U.K.) without exposure to air atmosphere. The BBr3-treated Li foil was washed with hexane to remove the residual BBr3 for LiBr characterization and was washed with 1 M LiPF6 in EC/DEC (50/50 = v/v) with 10 wt% FEC and with DEC to remove LiBr to characterize the naked Li surface. XRD analysis was performed in the 2θ range of 5° to 80° using a D8 Advance spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) from which ambient air was excluded. EBSD analysis was performed to determine the crystal orientation using an Oxford EBSD instrument (Oxford Instruments, U.K.) at the Research Institute of the Advanced Materials Research Center (RIAM) at Seoul National University. The electrical conductivity of the electrodeposited layer was measured in a glove box under Ar atmosphere using a digital multitester (HIOKI 3244-60, MISUMI, Japan). High resolution 3D XTM was performed to obtain 3D images of the electrodeposition layers using an Xradia 620 Versa instrument (Carl Zeiss, USA) at the National Centre for Inter-university Research Facilities (NCIRF) at Seoul National University. Li metal samples were sealed in airtight vials during the XTM analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Synthesis and Characterization of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Oxide

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NGOs were readily synthesized from the graphite via Taylor-Couette flow62 (link). The morphology of synthesized NGO particles was analyzed with Cs corrected HRTEM (JEM-ARM200F, Cold FEG, JEOL Ltd, Japan) after loaded to a 400 mesh carbon-coated copper grid. The size distribution of NGOs was analyzed using a CPS Disc Centrifuge (CPS instruments, USA). Next, NGOs prepared on a sapphire wafer were scanned by atomic force microscopy in noncontact mode (scanned area 25 μm2, XE-100, Park Systems, Republic of Korea). X-ray diffraction pattern of NGOs was obtained using SmartLab (Rigaku, Japan). The Raman spectrum of NGOs was obtained using 532 nm excitation laser (LabRAM HR Evolution, HORIBA, Japan). The powder of NGOs was subjected to X-ray photoelectron spectroscope (AXIS-His, Kratos, USA). FTIR spectrum of NGO was obtained by using FTIR Spectrophotometer (Nicolet 6700, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with conventional KBr pellet method. A zeta potential of NGOs was analyzed using Zetasizer Nano ZSP (Malvern Instruments, England). For detecting NGOs, biotin (#14400, Sigma, USA) was conjugated to NGOs by EDC (#77149, Thermo Fisher Scientific) - NHS (#24525, Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupling.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Ultrasmall MoS2 QDs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder XRD measurements of ultrasmall MoS2 QDs were performed using a Bruker D8 advanced diffractometer with a Cu Ka irradiation in the 2θ range of 200–600°. The elemental composition and binding energy of the sample were characterized by XPS (AXIS HIS, Kratos Analytical).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!