The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

25 protocols using cd20 l26

1

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Hematological Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry data were re-evaluated by three pathologists (P.N., P.S., and S.S.). The panels of the immunohistochemical test included CD3 (LN10, 1:600, Novocastra, Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany), CD4 (SP35, ready to use, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA), CD5 (Cell Marque, 4C7, 1:100, Rocklin, CA, USA), CD8 (C8/144B, ready to use, Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, USA), CD20 (L26, 1:2000, DAKO, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), CD30 (Ber-H2, 1:100, Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, USA), CD56 (123C3.D5, 1:50, Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, USA), βF1 (8A3, 1:20, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), γ-TCR (γ3.20, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and TIA1 (TIA-1, 1:500, Biocare Medical, Pacheco, CA, USA). EBER ISH (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) was also re-evaluated by the three pathologists.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Characterization of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded sections of each sample were immunostained. Antibodies (clones) used for immunohistochemistry were CD10 (56C6; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), CD20 (L-26; DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), BCL2 (124; DakoCytomation), BCL6 (P1F6; Leica Microsystems) and MUM1 (MUM1p; DakoCytomation). Each cases were considered positive if more than approximately 30% of the neoplastic cells were positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Lymphoma Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the immunohistochemical analysis, the following lymphoma antibodies were used: cytoplasmic CD3 (cCD3, PS1, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), CD20 (L26; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), CD5 (4C7; Novocastra, Newcastle, UK), CD4 (RMA-0620; Maixin, Shenzhen, China), CD8 (C8; Maixin, Shenzhen, China), TIA-1 (2G9; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), granzyme B (GZB01; Neomarkers, Fremont, CA, USA), and CD56 (123C3; Zymed, Guangzhou, China), CD30 (Ber-H2; Neomarkers, Fremont, CA, USA), and Ki-67 (M7259; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). All immunostaining were performed as previously described [32 (link)], and appropriate positive and negative controls were employed. The positive rate of CD30 and Ki-67 (positive tumor cells/total tumor cells) was recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Survivin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical detection of survivin was performed using a Dako Omnis autostainer (Dako North America, Inc. Carpinteria, CA) with rabbit monoclonal survivin antibody clone EP119 (Bio SB, Santa Barbara, CA). Additional antibodies included: CD4 (4B12, Dako); CD8 (C8/144B, Dako); CD20 (L26, Dako); PD-L1/CD274 (SP142, Spring Bioscience). Stained specimens were viewed by the neuropathologist, co-investigator (JQ), and survivin expression in the nucleus and cytoplasm was determined to be present or absent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Colorectal Cancer Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue microarrays containing the specimens from 30 CRC patients who received curative surgery in the first affiliated hospital of Chongqing medical university (Chongqing, China) from April 2016 to September 2017 were constructed for immunohistochemistry. Specimens were all confirmed by pathological analysis as colorectal cancer. Immunohistochemistry was performed as described earlier,32, 33 using monoclonal antibodies against CD3 (SP7), CD8 (4B11), CD45RO (OPD4), CD57 (NK1), tryptase (AA1), CD1A (Ab‐5), granulocytes (BM‐2), PDPN (D2‐40), cytokeratin (AE1AE3), FOXP3 (ab20034; AbCam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) CD68 (PGM‐1), CD20 (L26; DAKO, Carpinteria, CA), IL3RA (IL3RA; ATLAS Antibodies, Stockholm, Sweden), CXCR5 and IL‐17 (H‐132; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Isotype‐matched mouse monoclonal antibodies were used as negative controls. Slides were analyzed using an image analysis workstation (Spot Browser, ALPHELYS). Polychromatic high‐resolution spot‐images (740 × 540 pixel, 1.181 μm/pixel resolution) were obtained (x200 fold magnification). The density was recorded as the number of positive cells per unit tissue surface area. For each duplicate, the mean density was used for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunophenotyping of Formalin-Fixed Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All specimens were fixed in 10% neutral formalin, entrapped through conventional paraffin embedding, and processed into 4 μm serial sections with conventional HE staining. The immunohistochemical S-P method was employed to mark immune phenotypes. LCA (2B11, DAKO), CD3 (F7.2.38, DAKO), CD45RO (OPD4, DAKO), CD20 (L26, DAKO), CD10 (MX002, DAKO), CD15 (Carb-3, DAKO), CD30 (Ber-2, DAKO), Bcl-2 (SP66, DAKO), Bcl-6 (LN22, AKO), CyclinD-1 (DCS-6, DAKO), PAX-5 (SP34, DAKO), kappa light chain (L1C1, DAKO) and lambda light chain (LAM03+HP6054, DAKO) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue sections (4 µm thick) from archived paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were prepared for immunohistochemical and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Immunohistochemistry was performed using antibodies against CD3 (2GV6; Roche, Basel, Switzerland), CD20 (L26; DAKO, Santa Clara, CA), CD15 (Carb-3; DAKO), CD123 (6H6; Thermo Fischer Scientific), CD163 (10D6; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), or MPO (polyclonal; DAKO). All staining procedures were performed using an autoimmunostainer (Bond III [Leica Microsystems] or BenchMark Ultra [Ventana Medical Systems, Oro Valley, AZ]).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multicolor Immunohistochemistry for Cellular Phenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed tyramide signal amplification labeling with the Opal reagents (PerkinElmer, Waltham, Massachusetts) using the Opal 4‐color automation IHC method. The primary antibodies used were as follows; LOX‐1 (ab126538, 1:800, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), CD15 (Carb‐3, 1:400, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), CD11b (ab52478, 1:400, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), CD45 (1:400, #13917, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts), CD3 (ab16669, 1:300, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), CD20 (L26, 1:400, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), CD163 (1:1000, #93498, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts), and α‐SMA (M0851, 1:100, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Antigens were retrieved from the tissue sections using ImmunoSaver (Nisshin EM, Tokyo, Japan). Tissue sections were incubated with fluorophores Opal 520, 570, and 690 for 10 minutes at room temperature. Antigen retrieval was performed using 10 mM sodium citrate buffer pH 6 in a microwave for 15 minutes. Finally, all sections were counterstained with DAPI. Images were captured using the BZ‐X700 microscope (Keyence). We analyzed 10 cases from the stromal LOX‐1 high group using triple‐labeled high‐power fields.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 2‐μm FFPE sections in an automated immunostainer (Autostainer Link48; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The following antibodies were used: β‐catenin 14 (1 : 1000; BD Transduction, South San Francisco, CA, USA), CD3 polyclonal (1 : 400; Dako), CD4 4B12 (1 : 300; Dako), CD8 C8/144B (1 : 20; Dako), CD20 L26 (1 : 400; Dako), CD21 1F8 (1 : 50; Dako), CD56 123C3 (1 : 400; Dako), CD68 KP1 (1 : 3000; Dako), CD163 10D6 (1 : 200; Novocastra, Newcastle, UK), FOXP3 259D/C7 (1 : 200; BD Pharmingen), PD‐L1 SP142 (1 : 30; SPRING, Pleasanton, CA, USA), PD1 NAT105 (1 : 100; Biocare Medical, Pikenine, Concord, NC, USA), and EZH2 5246S (1 : 50; Cell Signaling, Leiden, Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multiplex Immunohistochemical Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Staining was carried out on FFPE sections following deparaffinization and antigen retrieval. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide. The sections were incubated with protein block (DAKO) and stained with primary antibodies against CD8 (SP16, Spring Bioscience), CD20 (L26, Dako) and DC-LAMP (1010E1.01, Dendritics), followed by the manifestation of enzymatic activity and hematoxylin counterstaining. The images were acquired using a Leica Aperio AT2 scanner (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!