The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Simoa human neurology 4 plex e assay

Manufactured by Quanterix
Sourced in United States

The Simoa Human Neurology 4-Plex E (N4PE) assay is a multiplex assay that measures the concentrations of four neurological biomarkers in human samples. The four biomarkers are Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP), Neurofilament Light (NfL), Ubiquitin Carboxy-Terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and Tau. This assay is designed to provide quantitative data on these biomarkers, which can be used in research and clinical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using simoa human neurology 4 plex e assay

1

Biomarker Quantification in Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma p-tau217 and NfL concentrations were measured at Lund University, Sweden, for all participants. P-tau217 was measured using an immunoassay on the Meso-Scale Discovery (MSD) platform developed by Eli Lilly as described previously [12 ]. NfL was measured using the commercially available Simoa immunoassay [13 (link), 14 (link)]. Plasma Aβ40, Aβ42, and GFAP concentrations were measured at the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, University of Gothenburg, Sweden, in 80 participants out of 110, those with enough plasma left. These three proteins were measured using the Simoa Human Neurology 4-Plex E (N4PE) assay (Quanterix®, Billerica, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Plasma Biomarker Measurement Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The current study adopted the plasma biomarker measurement pipeline of the SILCODE study. In brief, the single‐molecule array (Simoa) p‐tau181 Advantage Kit was used to measure p‐tau181 concentration, and the Simoa Human Neurology 4‐Plex E (N4PE) assay (Quanterix) was used to measure Aβ40, Aβ42, NfL, and GFAP concentrations. All measurements for the five analytes were above the detection limit, and the intra‐assay variation coefficient was less than 10%. The data were then matched to phenotype information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multimodal Plasma Biomarkers for Alzheimer's

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In SILCODE, P-tau181 concentration was measured by the Single Molecule array (Simoa) p-tau181 Advantage Kit, while Aβ40, Aβ42, NfL, and GFAP concentrations were measured by the Simoa Human Neurology 4-Plex E (N4PE) assay (Quanterix). All measurements for the 5 analytes exceeded the detection limit, with an intra-assay variation coefficient of less than 10%. The data were then matched to phenotype information.
In the ADNI cohort, plasma Aβ42/40 was detected by a high-precision liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) [49 (link)], and plasma p-tau181 was analyzed by the validated ultrasensitive Simoa technique at the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, University of Gothenburg, Sweden [36 (link)]. For p-tau181, the lower limit of quantification was 1.0 pg/ml.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Plasma Biomarker Profiling of ADCC Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biomarkers were tested for 1986 individual plasma samples from the ADCC. P-tau181 concentration was measured using the Simoa P-tau181 Advantage Kit, whilst Aβ40, Aβ42, NfL and GFAP concentrations were measured using the Simoa Human Neurology 4-Plex E (N4PE) assay (Quanterix). The measurements were performed in one round of experiments using one batch of reagents with the analysts blinded to diagnosis and clinical data. All measurements for all five analytes were above the limit of detection of the assays. Intra-assay coefficients of variation were below 10%. These data were then matched to phenotype information. Thirty-nine samples were removed at this stage based on missing/mismatching data for age and gender or due to ID duplication, leaving 1947 individuals for further analysis. Samples were excluded for each biomarker analysis on a case-by-case basis, based on outlier thresholds calculated using Median Absolute Deviation (MAD).30 (link) This method is more robust to remote outliers than the mean and SD method and copes better with skewed data due to its reliance on non-parametric measures of central tendency and variation. Pearson’s correlations between biomarkers were calculated for the 1735 samples which had no outlier measurements for any biomarker. Details of biomarker distributions are in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Plasma Biomarker Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were obtained by venepuncture and collected in EDTA tubes. They were centrifuged to isolate plasma, aliquoted and stored at −70°C until further analyses. Plasma assays were conducted at the UK Dementia Research Institute biomarker laboratory. Plasma samples were thawed on wet ice, centrifuged at 500× g for 5 min at 4°C. Calibrators (neat) and samples (plasma: 1:4 dilution) were measured in duplicates. The plasma assays measured were the Quanterix Simoa Human Neurology 4-Plex E assay (measuring Aβ40, Aβ42, GFAP and NfL) and the Quanterix Simoa p-tau181 measuring p-tau181 of the human tau protein. Assays were performed using the Simoa-HD1 according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Quanterix Corp, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA) (Rissin et al). All samples were analysed at the same time using the same batch of reagents. A four-parameter logistic curve fit data reduction method was used to generate a calibration curve. Two control samples of known concentration of the protein of interest (high-control and low-control) were included as quality control. The mean coefficient of variation percentage for p-tau181 was 6.29, for NfL 4.08, for Aβ42 3.06, for Aβ40 2.55 and for GFAP 4.12.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cytokine and Neuroinflammation Profiling in SARS-CoV-2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We screened serum samples at chosen time points of the SARS-CoV-2 disease course for the expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines using the Simoa CorPlex Human Cytokine 10-plex Panel 1 assay (Quanterix, Billerica, MA, USA). We targeted the following analytes: IFNγ, IL1β, IL4, IL5, IL6, IL8, IL10, IL12p70, IL22 and TNFα. In addition, markers for neuroinflammation were quantified using the Simoa Human Neurology 4-Plex E assay (Quanterix) for Abeta 40 (Aβ40), Abeta 42 (Aβ42), Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP™) and Neurofilament light (Nf-L). Data for the 10 CorPlex were acquired and analyzed on the SP-X Imaging and Analysis System™ (Quanterix), whereas the Neurology 4-Plex E assay was analyzed on the Simoa® HD-X Analyzer™ (Quanterix). Both kits were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Plasma Biomarker Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were obtained by venepuncture and collected in EDTA tubes. They were centrifuged to isolate plasma, aliquoted and stored at −70°C until further analyses. Plasma assays were conducted at the UK Dementia Research Institute biomarker laboratory. Plasma samples were thawed on wet ice, centrifuged at 500× g for 5 min at 4°C. Calibrators (neat) and samples (plasma: 1:4 dilution) were measured in duplicates. The plasma assays measured were the Quanterix Simoa Human Neurology 4-Plex E assay (measuring Aβ40, Aβ42, GFAP and NfL) and the Quanterix Simoa p-tau181 measuring p-tau181 of the human tau protein. Assays were performed using the Simoa-HD1 according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Quanterix Corp, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA) (Rissin et al). All samples were analysed at the same time using the same batch of reagents. A four-parameter logistic curve fit data reduction method was used to generate a calibration curve. Two control samples of known concentration of the protein of interest (high-control and low-control) were included as quality control. The mean coefficient of variation percentage for p-tau181 was 6.29, for NfL 4.08, for Aβ42 3.06, for Aβ40 2.55 and for GFAP 4.12.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!