The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using ceftriaxone

1

Antibiogram Assay of Salmonella Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2017 guidelines [13 ], an antibiogram assay was performed on the isolated Salmonella spp. colonies. The antibiotic discs contained nalidixic acid (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), cotrimoxazole (25 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), cefixime (5 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftizoxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), azithromycin (15 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg) and imipenem (10 μg) (Mast Diagnostics, United Kingdom).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Resistance in Shigella

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility of Shigella species was evaluated using the disk diffusion method (Kirby–Bauer test) on Mueller Hinton agar (Merck, Germany), in accordance with the recommendations provided by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI 2022) guidelines [16 ]. Following antibiotic disks were used: amikacin (AN/30 μg), chloramphenicol (C/30 μg), trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (SXT/1.25/23.75 μg), nalidixic acid (NA/30 μg), norfloxacin (NOR/10 μg), ofloxacin (OFX/5 μg), ceftriaxone (CRO/30 μg), cefotaxime (CTX/30 μg), ceftazidime (CAZ/30 μg), ceftizoxime (CT/30 μg), cefixime (CFM/5 μg), azithromycin (AZM/15 μg), cefoxitin (FOX/30 μg), Amoxicillin (AMX/25), piperacillin–tazobactam (100/10 μg) (Mast Diagnostics, Merseyside, UK).
The phenotype(s) of Shigella isolates were classified as MDR (multidrug-resistant) when they displayed “non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories” [17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Susceptibility of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Initially, all Isolates were tested using the Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (2013) . E. coli ATCC25922 was used as control strains. The tested antibiotics included: ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, amoxicillin/clavulanate, ticarcillin, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cephalothin, cefuroxime, cefoxitin, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, and aztreonam (Mast Diagnostics, Merseyside, UK). co-trimoxazole, gentamicin, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, meropenem, tetracycline, and nitrofurantoin (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK). MIC values were extrapolated by the BIOMIC automated reading system and software package (Giles Scientific, New York, NY, USA).
The disk diffusion method was applied to assess ESBL production in all the Isolates with cefotaxime (30 ug) and ceftazidime (30 ug) alone and in combination with clavulanic acid (10 ug) as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of Shigella spp.

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic resistance of Shigella spp. isolates was determined using the disk diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2016 guidelines.9 The antibiotic discs used contained cotrimoxazole (25 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ampicillin (10μg), ceftizoxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefixime (5 μg), cefotaxime (30μg), tetracycline (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), azithromycin (15 μg) and imipenem (10 μg) (Mast Diagnostics, Bootle, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
According to the clinical and laboratory standards Institute protocol (CLSI; M100-S14) [13 ], the antibiotic susceptibility was tested by disk agar diffusion method on the Mueller-Hinton agar plates (MHA) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for ceftazidime (CAZ: 30 µg), cefotaxime (CTX: 30 µg), imipenem (IPM: 10 µg), meropenem (MEM: 10 µg), ciprofloxacin (CIP: 5 µg), cefepime (FEP: 30 µg), ceftriaxone (CRO: 30 µg), amikacin (AN: 30 µg), gentamicin (GM; 10 µg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT; 5 µg) (MAST Diagnostics, Merseyside, UK).
Strains non-susceptible to at least three or more antimicrobial classes were defined as MDR, and those non-susceptible to at least one agent in all but two or more antimicrobial categories were considered as possible XDR, and the strains that non-susceptibility to all agents in all antimicrobial categories were defined as possible pan drug-resistant (PDR) [14 (link)]. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as control organism in susceptibility testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility test was done by the disk diffusion method on the Mueller−Hinton agar plates (Merck) according to CLSI guideline18 for amikacin (AMK: 30 μg), gentamycin (GEN: 10 μg), tobramycin (TOB: 10 μg), piperacillin‐tazobactam (PTZ:110), imipenem (IMI: 10 μg), meropenem (MER: 10 μg), ertapenem (ERT: 10 μg), cefazolin (CZ:30 μg), cefoxitin (FOX: 30 μg), cefotaxime (CTX:30 μg), ceftazidime (CAZ: 30 μg), ceftriaxone (CRO: 30 μg), cefoperazone (CFP: 75 μg), ciprofloxacin (CIP: 5 μg), azithromycin (AZ: 15 μg), ampicillin‐sulbactam (AMP/SL: 20 μg), and tigecycline (TGC: 15 μg) (MAST Diagnostics). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a quality control strain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2017 guidelines (9), a disk diffusion assay was performed on the isolated E. coli colonies. The antibiotic discs contained nalidixic acid (30 µg), ampicillin (10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), cotrimoxazole (25 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), ce xime (5 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftizoxime (30 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), azithromycin (15 µg), cipro oxacin (5 µg), gentamicin (10 µg) and imipenem (10 µg) (Mast Diagnostics, United Kingdom).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility of the all isolated bacteria was determined in vitro, utilizing the disc diffusion method in accordance with the CLSI criteria [7] . The tested antibiotics included ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, amoxicillin, cefepime, tazocin, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin and colistin (MAST Diagnostics, Merseyside, UK). Susceptibility testing for meropenem and/or imipenem was performed according to the CLSI reference by using E-test method (Liofilchem, Italy). Carbapenem-resistant isolates were selected using the CLSI M100-S standard (27th edition) definition, i.e., not susceptible (intermediate or resistant, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ≥2 µg/ml) to meropenem and/or imipenem, as defined by the current [12] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In concordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; CLSI. 2018 [16], antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done on the Mueller-Hinton agar plates (Merck Co., Germany) by disk agar diffusion (DD) method against 16 following antimicrobials: levo oxacin (LEV; 5 µg); ceftazidime (CAZ; 30 µg), cefotaxime (CTX; 30 µg ), cefepime (FEP; 30 µg), ertapenem (ETP; 10 µg), amikacin (AK; 30 µg), meropenem (MER; 10 µg), ceftriaxone (CRO; 30 μg), ampicillin/sulbactam (SAM; 10/10 µg), cefoperazone (CFP; 75 µg), imipenem (IPM; 10 µg), nitrofurantoin (NIT;300 µg), gentamicin (GM; 10 µg), cipro oxacin (CIP; 5 µg), tetracycline (TET; 30 µg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT; 5 µg) (MAST Diagnostics, Merseyside, UK). The MDR and possible XDR/PDR strains were recognized according to the guidelines suggested by the European Center for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC) (17) . E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a quality control (QC) organism. Also, colistin susceptibility assay was performed for carbapenems-resistance isolates by broth microdilution method according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints. The E. coli NCTC 13846 (a colistin resistant strain) was used as QC in colistin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolated bacteria was determined in vitro, utilizing the disc diffusion method in accordance with the CLSI criteria (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2018). The tested antibiotics included ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, amoxicillin, cefepime, tazocin, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and colistin (MAST Diagnostics, Merseyside, UK). Susceptibility testing for meropenem and/or imipenem was performed according to the CLSI reference by using E test method (Liofilchem, Italy). Carbapenem-resistant isolates were selected using the CLSI M100-S standard (27th edition) definition, i.e., not susceptible (intermediate or resistant, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ≥ 2 μg/ml) to meropenem and/or imipenem, as defined by the current (Miller et al. 2017) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!