The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Calibrated imaging densitometer

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States

The Calibrated Imaging Densitometer is an instrument designed to quantify the optical density of samples, such as gels or blots, in a laboratory setting. It captures high-resolution images of the samples and provides precise measurements of the intensity levels within the images.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using calibrated imaging densitometer

1

Proteomic Profiling of Sheath Blight Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The one-dimensional separation of total protein was performed using isoelectric focusing (IEF) according to a procedure mentioned in Bio-Rad manual book. 800 µg of total protein was taken for rehydration on 17-cm strips (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in a linear pH gradient (4–7). Isoelectric focussing (IEF) was conducted using the IEF Cell (Bio-Rad) with a procedure mentioned in Bio-Rad manual. The temperature of instrument during IEF was 20 °C and 50 mA electrical current was maintained per strip. After focussing, strips were equilibrated two times with equilibration buffer I and equilibrium buffer II, respectively, each for 15 min duration. Second dimension electrophoresis was performed with equilibrated strips in SDS-PAGE in a vertical slab of 12% acrylamide. PROTEAN Tetra Cell (Bio-Rad) instrument was used for these perpose. The protein gels were stained using the colloidal Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-350 and spots were visualised using a Calibrated Imaging Densitometer (Bio-Rad, GS–800). Three independent biological replicates were prepared for each of six sets of samples [WT and progeny transgenic plants prior to and post 24 and 48 h sheath blight infection].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Cardiac Mast Cell Degranulation and Interstitial Collagen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed LV tissue was embedded in paraffin and 5 μm thick cross sections were stained with collagen specific picrosirius red.[18 (link)] Twenty microscopic fields (100 X) per section devoid of perivascular collagen were imaged. Interstitial collagen volume fraction (CVF) was determined from these images using ImageProPlus 6.0. (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Bethesda, MD) and was expressed as percent of collagen stained area in the field. LV MCs were stained with toluidine blue.[19 (link)] MC density in the section was calculated by dividing the number of MCs per section by the section area measured with a calibrated imaging densitometer (Bio-Rad). If one or more extruded granules were visible adjacent to the MC, the cell was considered to be degranulating.[20 (link)] The degranulating MCs were counted and divided by the total MC population in the section to yield the percent degranulation. To localize PAR-2 in cardiac MCs, formalin-fixed LV tissue sections from sham rat hearts were immunostained with PAR-2 antibody and mouse ABC staining system (SCBT Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), which was followed by alcian blue staining, a specific stain for MCs.[17 (link)]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Differential Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subsequent to staining, picture of the gel was captured using the instrument Calibrated Imaging Densitometer (Bio-Rad, GS–800) and the picture was thoroughly analysed with the help of PD Quest Software version 8.0 (Bio-Rad, USA). All the protein spots in the gel were compared to the respective spots in the reference gel, and normalisation of each spot density was performed against total densities of gel. The percentage volume of each spot was calculated considering the value of three biological replicates. Statistical analysis (t-test) was performed in order to evaluate the significant differences between WT and transgenic plants respectively. Only those protein spots showing reproducible fold change (>2.0-fold for up-regulation and ˂0.5-fold for down-regulation) and significant differences (P < 0.05) were considered as DEPs (differentially expressed proteins).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!