The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Clone 44

Manufactured by BD
Sourced in Switzerland, Germany

The Clone 44 is a compact and versatile laboratory equipment designed for a range of applications. It features a temperature-controlled incubation chamber and precise temperature control functionality. The Clone 44 is intended for use in various laboratory settings, where consistent and reliable temperature conditions are required for experimentation or sample processing.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using clone 44

1

Immunohistochemical Detection of DNA Mismatch Repair Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry for MSH2 (clone 25D12, Novocastra (Biosystems Switzerland, Muttenz, Switzerland), dilution 1 : 100; or Clone G219-1129, Roche Ventana Medical Systems, ready-to-use), MSH-6 (clone 44, Becton Dickinson, Allschwil, Switzerland, dilution 1 : 500; or Clone EP49, Epitomics (LabForce, Nunningen, Switzerland), dilution 1 : 50), MLH1 (clone G168-15, Becton Dickinson, dilution 1 : 100; or clone M1, Roche Ventana Medical Systems, ready-to-use) and PMS2 (clone A16-4, Becton Dickinson, dilution 1 : 300; or Clone EPR3947, Roche Ventana Medical Systems, ready-to-use) was performed using the Ventana Benchmark system or using the OptiView DAB Detection Kit (Ventana Medical Systems) followed by counterstaining with haematoxylin.
Any nuclear staining in the tumour cells was considered as ‘positive'. Complete absence of immunoreactivity in the presence of a positive internal control (lymphocytes) was scored as ‘negative'.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of MMR Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining for Mlh1, Msh2, Msh6 and Pms2 proteins was performed in lymphoma cells from the single Msh2wt mouse that displayed an MSI lymphoma following Aza treatment. Briefly, 4 μm sections were incubated with monoclonal antibodies against MLH1 (1/20 dilution, clone G168–728, Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), MSH2 (1/25 dilution, clone FE11, Calbiochem, Oncogene Research Products, Cambridge, MA), MSH6 (1/25 dilution, clone 44, Becton Dickinson, Lexington, NC) and PMS2 (1/20 dilution, clone A16–4, BD PharMingen, Le Pont de Claix, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Tumor Biomarker Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HER2-and MET-status was assessed as previously described [11] (link), [12] (link), [16] (link), [17] (link), [18] (link) using immunohistochemistry [anti-Her2/neu antibody; clone SP3, Thermo Fisher Scientific; Fremont; USA (#MA5-14509); anti-MET antibody; clone SP44; Spring Bioscience; Pleasanton, California, USA (#M3444)] and in situ–hybridization [ZytoDot 2C SPEC HER2/CEN17 Probe (#C-3032-400), ZytoDot 2C SPEC MET/CEN7 Probe (#C-3057-400) and the ZytoDot 2C CISH Implementation Kit (#C-3044-40); ZytoVision GmbH, Bremerhaven, Germany)]. Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)–encoded RNA was detected using the EBER-probe (Novocastra, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Nussloch, Germany; #PB0589) and the BondMax-detection system according to the manufacturer's instructions (Leica Microsystems GmbH). MSI status was assessed by immunostaining using antibodies directed against MLH1 (clone G168-15, BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany; #MA1-25669), PMS2 (clone MRQ-28; Cell Marque Corporation, Rocklin, USA; #288M-16-ASR), MSH2 (clone FE11; Calbiochem, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; #MABE284), and MSH6 (clone 44, BD Biosciences; #610919) as well as by comparison of the allelic profiles of the mononucleotide repeat markers BAT-25, BAT-26, NR-21, NR-24, and NR-27 in tumor and corresponding normal tissue in cases with ambiguous immunostaining [16] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of MMR Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoperoxidase staining for MLH1 (1:300; clone G168-728, Cell Marque), PMS2 (1:125; clone A16-4, BD Biosciences), MSH2 (1:100; clone FE11, Calbiochem), and MSH6 (1:300; clone 44, BD Biosciences) was performed on unstained CB sections with the Leica Bond III stainer (Rankin Biomedical Corporation). MMR IPOX was interpreted as retained, lost, suboptimal, or noncontributory (Figure 1, A through E; and Figure 2, A through T). Retained staining was defined as any perceivable nuclear staining in any percentage of tumor cells. The intensity of positive staining in tumor cells was compared to the intensity of staining in internal control cells. Loss of staining was defined as complete absence of nuclear staining in all tumor cells but retained in normal cells. Suboptimal staining was defined as Questionable Staining of definitive tumor cells (designated S-QS) or focal staining of Cells that were Indefinite For Tumor (designated S-CIFT). Noncontributory (NC) staining was used to describe those cases where there was lack of staining in both internal control cells (ie, normal cells such as lymphocytes, mesothelial cells, and glandular cells) and tumor cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of ALDH1A1 in HHL-6 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was performed on the HHL-6 human hepatocyte cell line and protein lysates were separated by electrophoresis on 4% to 12% Tris-glycine gels and transferred onto a poly inylidine difluoride membrane. After being blocked with 5% non-fat milk, the membrane was incubated at 4°C overnight with two separate ALDH1A1 primary antibodies (EP1932Y, Epitomics and clone 44, BD Biosciences), both at 1:500 dilution, washed, incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and detected with ECL detection reagent (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!