The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Fame32

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

FAME32 is a high-performance laboratory instrument designed for the analysis of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in various samples. It utilizes gas chromatography technology to separate and quantify individual fatty acid components with precision and accuracy.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using fame32

1

Fatty Acid Profiling of Yeast Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipids were extracted from freeze-dried cells (around 20 mg) by transmethylation described by Browse et al. [18 (link)]. The methylated FA (FAMEs) were then analyzed using gas chromatography equipped with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID, Varian 3900, Walnut Creek, CA, USA) and a Varian FactorFour vf-23 ms column where the bleed specification at 260 °C is 3 pA (30 m, 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm).
The FAMEs were identified via comparisons with commercial standards (FAME32, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) and quantified using the internal standard, 100 μg of commercial dodecanoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Commercial standards of OCFAs (Odd Carbon Straight Chains Kit containing 9 FAs, OC9, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA,) were converted into their FAMEs using the same method employed with the yeast samples. They were then analyzed by GC to identify the OCFAs from the yeast samples. For each data point, we used three biological replicates and calculated average and standard deviation values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Cellular Lipid Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipid content of the cells was determined by quantifying their FA fraction, as previously described [59 (link)]. Cells from-10 mL culture samples were collected in pre-weighed tubes, washed twice in water (for cultures in sugar-based medium), or twice successively in a mixture of 0.5% BSA and 0.9% NaCl and once in water (for oily medium), and resuspended in 1 mL water. After freeze-drying for 24 h at − 55 °C (Alpha 1-2Dplus, Bioblock Scientific), samples in their tubes were weighed and stored at − 20 °C. The difference in tube weights represented the mass of the cells found in 10-mL cultures and permitted calculation of the biomass in g/L.
Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMES) were recovered from 10 to 20 mg aliquots of freeze-dried cells (2 to 4 mg in samples collected at 4.5 h), using a hot methanol–H2SO4 method, adapted from Browse et al. [79 (link)], and analyzed by gas chromatography on a Varian 430 equipped with a flame-ionization detector and a FactorFour vf-23 ms column. FAMES were identified by comparison to commercial standards (FAME32; Supelco); an internal FA standard (100 µg C12:0 from Sigma) was added to each sample prior to transesterification to enable FA quantification in the analyzed aliquots.
Lipid content is expressed with respect to DCW: lipid content of 1% DCW = 10 mg FA per g of dry cell.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fatty Acid Profiling of Yeast Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fatty acids (FAs) in 15-mg aliquots of freeze-dried cells were converted into methyl esters using the method described in Browse et al. [34 (link), 30 (link)]. FA methyl esters were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) on a Varian 3900 equipped with a flame ionization detector and a Varian Factor Four vf-23 ms column, for which the bleed specification at 260°C was 3 pA (30 m, 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm). FAs were identified by comparing their GC patterns to those of commercial FA methyl ester standards (FAME32; Supelco) and quantified using the internal standard method, which involved the addition of 50 mg of commercial C17:0 (Sigma). Total lipid extractions were obtained from 100-mg samples (expressed in terms of CDW, as per Folch et al. [16 ]). Briefly, yeast cells were spun down, washed with water, freeze dried, and then resuspended in a 2:1 chloroform/methanol solution and vortexed with glass beads for 20 min. The organic phase was collected and washed with 0.4 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution before being dried at 60°C overnight and weighed to quantify lipid production.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fatty Acid Profiling of Lyophilized Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fatty acids from lyophilized cells were converted to their fatty acid methyl ester counterparts using the method described in [29 (link)] and [30 (link)]. Fatty acid methyl esters were analyzed on a Varian 3900 gas chromatograph that was equipped with a flame ionization detector and a Varian Factor Four vf-23 ms column, for which the specifications at 260 °C were 3 pA (30 m, 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm). Fatty acids were identified by comparing their chromatograms to those of commercial fatty acid methyl ester standards (FAME32; Supelco) and quantified using the internal standard method with 100 mg of commercial C12:0 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of Yeast Lipids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipids were extracted from 10 to 20 mg of freeze-dried cells and converted into FA methyl esters (FAMEs) using the procedure described by Browse et al. (1986 (link)). The FAMEs were then analyzed using gas chromatography (GC), which was carried out with a Varian 3900 instrument equipped with a flame ionization detector and a Varian FactorFour vf-23ms column, where the bleed specification at 260°C is 3 pA (30 m, 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm). The FAMEs were identified via comparisons with commercial standards (FAME32, Supelco) and quantified using the internal standard method, which involves the addition of 100 μg of commercial dodecanoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich). Commercial odd-chain FAs (Odd Carbon Straight Chains Kit containing 9 FAs, OC9, Supelco) were converted into their FAMEs using the same method employed with the yeast samples. They were then identified using GC and compared with the odd-chain FAs from the yeast samples.
To determine dry cell weight (DCW), 2 mL of the culture was taken from the flasks, washed, and lysophilized in a pre-weighed tube. The differences in mass corresponded to the mg of cells found in 2 mL of culture.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fatty Acid Profiling by GC Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipids from aliquots of 10–20 mg of cells were converted into their methyl esters with freeze-dried cells according to Browse et al. [55 (link)] and used for gas chromatography (GC) analysis. GC analysis of FA methyl esters was performed with a Varian 3900 instrument equipped with a flame ionization detector and a Varian FactorFour vf-23 ms column, where the bleed specification at 260 °C is 3 pA (30 m, 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm). FA was identified by comparison to commercial FA methyl ester standards (FAME32; Supelco) and quantified by the internal standard method, involving the addition of 50 μg of commercial C17:0 (Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fatty Acid Profiling of Yeast Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipids were extracted from 10 to 20 ​mg of freeze-dried cells and converted into FA methyl esters (FAMEs) using the procedure described by Browse et al. [Browse et al., 1986 (link)]. The FAMEs were then analyzed using gas chromatography (GC), which was carried out with a Varian 3900 instrument (Varian Inc. USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector and a Varian FactorFour vf-23 ​ms column, where the bleed specification at 260 ​°C is 3 ​pA (30 ​m, 0.25 ​mm, 0.25 ​μm). The FAMEs were identified via comparisons with commercial standards (FAME32, Supelco) and quantified using the internal standard, 100 ​μg of commercial dodecanoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Commercial standards of OCFAs (Odd Carbon Straight Chains Kit containing 9 FAs, OC9, Merck, Germany) were converted into their FAMEs using the same method employed with the yeast samples. They were then analyzed by GC to identify the OCFAs from the yeast samples. For each data point, we used at least two biological replicates and calculated average and standard deviation values.
To determine the dry cell weight (DCW), 2 ​mL of the culture was taken from the flasks, washed, and lysophilized in a pre-weighed tube. The differences in mass corresponded to the mg of cells found in 2 ​mL of culture.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

GC Analysis of Cellular Fatty Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipids from aliquots of 10–20 mg of cells were converted into their methyl esters with freeze-dried cells according to Browse et al. [30 (link)] and were used for gas chromatography (GC) analysis. GC analysis of fatty acid (FA) methyl esters was performed with a Varian 3900 instrument equipped with a flame ionization detector and a Varian FactorFour vf-23 ms column, where the bleed specification at 260 °C is 3 pA (30 m, 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm). FAs were identified by comparison to commercial FA methyl ester standards (FAME32; Supelco) and quantified by the internal standard method, which involves the addition of 50 μg of commercial C17:0 (Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fatty Acid Profiling of Microbial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipids were extracted from 10 to 20 mg of freeze-dried cells, and converted into their fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) according to Browse et al. [54 (link)], and FAMEs were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) analysis. GC analysis of FAMEs was carried out on a Varian 3900 instrument equipped with a flame ionization detector and a Varian FactorFour vf-23 ms column, where the bleed specification at 260 °C is 3 pA (30 m, 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm). Fatty acids were identified by comparison to commercial FAME standards (FAME32, Supelco) and quantified by the internal standard method, involving the addition of 100 μg of commercial dodecanoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich). Commercial odd chain fatty acids (9 Odd carbon fatty acids, OC9, Supelco) were converted to their FAMEs with a same method for yeast samples, and analyzed by GC to identify and compare odd chain fatty acids from yeast samples.
To determine DCW in flask experiments, 2 mL of the culture were washed and lysophilized in a pre-weighed tube. The differences in weight corresponded to the mg of cells found in 2 mL of culture. For each data point, we used at least two biological replicates and calculated average and standard deviation values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Determination of Algal Cell Dry Weight and Fatty Acid Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For dry cell weight (DCW) determination, the culture was washed two times with distilled water and lyophilized in a preweighed tube. The differences in mass corresponded to the mg of cells found in the culture. Lipids were extracted from 10 to 20 mg of dried cells and converted into FA methyl esters (FAMEs) using the procedure described by Browse et al. (1986 (link)) with cyclohexane instead of hexane. Briefly, dried biomass (10–20 mg) was mixed with 1 mL of 2.5% (v/v) sulfuric acid in methanol, which contained 25 μg of commercial dodecanoic acid (Sigma‐Aldrich) as an internal standard. Tubes were vortexed and incubated at 80°C for 120 min to form FAMEs. After transesterification, 1 mL of cyclohexane and 0.5 mL of distilled water were added. The FAME‐containing cyclohexane phase was analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) using a Varian 430 instrument (Varian Inc.) equipped with a flame ionization detector and a Varian FactorFour vf‐23 ms column, where the bleed specification at 260°C was 3 pA (30 m, 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm). The FAMEs were identified by comparison with commercial standards (FAME32; Supelco) and quantified using dodecanoic acid as an internal standard. For each condition, we used three biological replicates and calculated average and standard deviation values. The p‐values were calculated using a Welch t‐test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!