The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

M3653

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The M3653 is a laboratory equipment product from Agilent Technologies. It is a high-precision instrument designed for analytical applications. The core function of the M3653 is to provide accurate and reliable measurements for research and testing purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using m3653

1

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of PD-L1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One representative section of each surgical tumor resection or biopsy specimen was stained with antibodies against PD-L1 (M3653, Dako). The immunoreactivity of PD-L1 was evaluated according to the percentage of membranous (complete or incomplete) positively stained tumor cells (Tumor proportion score (TPS)) and the percentage of positively stained tumor associated immune cells (TAIs), i.e. all immune cell subtypes (categorization into 0%, 1%, 3%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%, etc. in both). Staining intensity was not considered. Specimens in which PD-L1 staining was observed in ≥1% of tumor cells or immune cells were considered PD-L1 positive.
Additionally, the combined positive score (CPS) and the interface pattern were evaluated. CPS was calculated by dividing the number of PD-L1 positive tumor cells, lymphocytes and histiocytes by the total number of vital tumor cells and then multiplying the result by 100. The interface pattern was described by Muro K et al. as a band of PD-L1-positive cells (mainly mononuclear inflammatory cells) at the interface between confluent areas of neoplastic cells and adjacent stroma [6 (link)]. We evaluated the presence of this pattern dichotomously (yes/no). All analyses were performed independently by two experienced pathologists (A.B., AI.S) and in case of differing results a consensus was reached together.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PD-L1 Expression in Tumor Xenografts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
U87MG, A549,
GL261, and GL261-iPDL1 tumor-bearing mice were sacrificed after Al[18F]F-NOTA-PCP1 PET/CT imaging, and tumors were immediately
removed and placed in 4% neutral buffered formalin for 48 h. Subsequently,
tumors were dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and then sections were
baked for 60 min at 65 °C before dewaxing and hydration. Subsequently,
antigens were repaired via antigen repair buffer (K8004 EnVisionTM
FLEX Target Retrieval Solution, High PHX50) for 50 min. The sections
were incubated with antihuman PD-L1 antibody (M3653, Dako, Agilent,
USA) or antimouse PD-L1 antibody (ab238697, Abcam, UK). Afterward,
the samples were incubated with FLEX/HRP (Agilent, SM802) for 20 min
and then with Flex (SM803) DAB+Sub chromo (diaminobenzidine-peroxidase
substrate, Dako) for 10 min. Finally, the sections were scanned via
a ZEISS Automatic Digital Slide Scanner (Axio Scan. Z1, German), and
ZEN 2012 software (blue edition) was utilized to analyze the data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

PD-L1 (22C3) Immunohistochemistry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primary antibodies used in this study include PD-L1 (22C3) (Dako, M3653, 1:50). The immunohistochemistry staining of PD-L1 (22C3) was performed on a Dako Autostainer Link 48 platform with the Dako K8002 detection kit, and the signals were amplified with a mouse linker (contained in the kit) and the signals enhanced with a DAB enhancer (Dako, S1961); the staining procedure was set similar to the FDA-approved PD-L1 (22C3) pharmDx staining procedure. All immunohistochemistry (IHC) sections were evaluated by two pathologists independently. PD-L1 ≥1% on tumor cells were defined as positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!