The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sylgard 184

Manufactured by Dow
Sourced in United States, Germany, China, Australia, United Kingdom, Belgium, Japan, Canada, India, France

Sylgard 184 is a two-part silicone elastomer system. It is composed of a siloxane polymer and a curing agent. When mixed, the components crosslink to form a flexible, transparent, and durable silicone rubber. The core function of Sylgard 184 is to provide a versatile material for a wide range of applications, including molding, encapsulation, and coating.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

1 697 protocols using sylgard 184

1

Synthesis of DPI-HFP/Polymer Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The required amount of diphenyl iodonium hexafluorophosphate (DPI-HFP; TCI, Japan) for a 1:1 mass ratio was added to Ecoflex 00-30 prepolymer (Smooth-On, USA), followed by manual stirring using a metal stick to prepare DPI-HFP/Ecoflex 00-30 resin. Then, the mixture was placed in a vacuum desiccator for 5 min to remove air bubbles. The mixture was poured into a three-dimensionally (3D) printed mold and cured in an oven at 60°C for 30 min. The same procedure was followed to prepare the DPI-HFP/Sylgard-184 composite using Sylgard-184 (Dow Corning, USA), except that the prepolymer was in a 20:1 ratio and curing was performed for 60 min. To prepare the DPI-HFP/PDMS composite used for residue analysis, trimethyl-terminated PDMS (M.W. = 139,000; Alfa Aesar, USA) was mixed with 20 wt% DPI-HFP.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fabrication of PDMS Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PDMS precursor mixtures were prepared by combining Sylgard 184 base and hardener (Sylgard 184, Dow Corning Corporation, USA) in the ratio of 10:1 (by weight) by means of mixing in a beaker for several minutes with a spatula. The prepared mixtures were then placed in desiccators and degassed under vacuum until no bubbles remained in the bulk of the mixtures. Glass substrates were prepared for coating by means of a standard cleaning method comprising sequential ultrasonication in trichloroethane, acetone, methanol and deionized water for 10 min each, following by drying with N2 gas. The precursor mixtures were spin coated onto 22 × 30 mm glass substrates for 30 s at 3000 rpm. Next, the PDMS coatings were annealed by heating them on hotplates for 120 min. Various annealing temperatures were used: 65, 90, 125, 185 and 245 °C. This procedure yielded PDMS films 20 μm thick.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fabrication of Skin-Mimicking Phantom Layers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The skin phantom structures included two layers of silicone polymers to mimic the epidermis and the underlying soft tissue22 (link). The latter (6 mm, thermal conductivity ~0.5 W/mK)23 ,24 (link) was formed by mixing the base and curing agent of a commercial polymer kit (1:1, Sylgard 170, Dow Corning, the thermal conductivity of silicone made by Sylgard 170 is 0.48 W/mK)25 , casting a sheet and curing at room temperature for 24 h. The former (100 μm, thermal conductivity 0.2 ~ 0.37 W/mK)23 ,24 (link) was formed by mixing the base and curing agent of the same kit but at a different ratio (10:1, Sylgard 184, Dow Corning, the thermal conductivity of silicone made by Sylgard 184 is 0.27 W/mK)26 , casting and curing at room temperature for 24 h. The casting process used a silicon wafer for the thin top film, an acrylic plate for the bottom film, and with spacers to control the thickness. Plasma treating the surfaces enabled a strong bond to form upon contact, to yield the final bilayer structure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fabrication of Nepenthes Peristome-like PDMS Membrane

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS, Dow Corning® Sylgard 184, part A) and a crosslinking agent (Sylgard 184, part B) were mixed with a 10:1 PDMS base to a curing agent ratio. The stiffness of the PDMS can be manipulated by the addition of a curing agent. To avoid bubbles, the mixed PDMS must be placed in a vacuum desiccator until the bubbles disappear. The PDMS solution was then poured into a 35 mm dish and placed in the oven at 60 °C for 4 h until the structure stabilized. SU-8 based bionic (Nepenthes peristome-like) structure was cleaned with deionized water before plasma cleaning for 1 min. Moreover, the platinum was coated on the surface of the SU-8 based bionic structure. After all these steps were completed, the mixed PDMS solution was poured into the SU-8 mold and vacuumed to remove extra bubbles. Then, it stood in the oven at 65 °C for 4 h. The bionic replica of the PDMS membrane was slit to generate the Nepenthes peristome-like structure (Figure 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microneedle Fabrication using Gantrez Matrix

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microneedles were fabricated using a micromolding technique. Two types of PDMS molds were fabricated in this study. In the first type, PDMS (Sylgard 184, Dow Corning, Midland, MI, USA) was placed in a 60 °C furnace for five hours for polymerization; in the second type, PDMS (Sylgard 184, Dow Corning, Midland, MI, USA) was kept at room temperature for two days. After the molds were fabricated, GantrezTM (GantrezTM AN-119 BF, Ashland Global Holdings Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA) was dissolved in deionized water (80% w/w), agitated for two days, degassed under vacuum, and sonicated to facilitate entry of material into the bores of the mold. Amphotericin B powder was added to the matrix for the last 12 h. Simultaneous vacuuming and sonication were helpful for reducing the vacuum pressure and producing sharper needles. When using the mold with material at room temperature, water was evaporated, and the matrix was polymerized. Microneedles with two drug ratios (4% and 8%) were fabricated in this study. Since amphotericin B is insoluble in water, it is in the form of a suspension solution with GantrezTM powder.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PDMS Topological Matrix Fabrication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) topological matrixes were performed as previously described [19] (link). The spacing between the micropillars was 4 µm; the diameter of the micropillars was 4 µm; the height of the micropillars was also 4 µm. PDMS (Sylgard 184, Dow-Corning, Midland, MI) consisting of an oligomeric base and a curing agent was thoroughly mixed at two ratios (oligomeric base/Sylgard184 = 10:1 and 30:1). The mixture was cast onto the silicon mold, degassed under vacuum for about 20 min and then cross-linked at 80°C for 12 h. Finally, the PDMS matrixes were peeled off from the silicon mold.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fabrication of Soft Microfluidic Channels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fabrication of soft microfluidic channels was based on our previously reported method (28 (link)). Briefly, the soft microfluidic probe consists of a defined microchannel layer and a capping layer, which are bonded by corona treatment. The microchannel layer was formed by casting and curing a PDMS layer (elastomer/curing agent ratio, 10:1; Sylgard 184, Dow Corning) (~80 μm) between a patterned silicon wafer and a supporting glass slide. Microfluidic channel patterns on the silicon wafer were created by a standard photolithography approach, followed by deep reactive ion etching (DRIE) (STS Pegasus ICP-DRIE; SPTS Technologies, Newport, UK). Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) A2 solution (2 g PMMA dissolved in 98 g anisole) was spin-coated at a rate of 3000 rpm for 1 min onto the patterned silicon wafer surface and cured at 185°C for 5 min resulting in an antiadhesion layer. The capping layer (thickness, ~70 μm) was prepared by spin-casting PDMS (elastomer/curing agent ratio, 10:1; Sylgard 184, Dow Corning) on a PMMA-coated glass slide followed by baking at 70°C for 45 to 60 min. The total thickness of the channel layer and the capping layer is ~150 μm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fabrication of PDMS Stencils for Cell Micropatterning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The stencils for cell micropatterning were made using Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). The components of PDMS stencil comprised of a thin PDMS sheet ≈130 µm and thick 2 mm PDMS gasket (Specialty Silicone Products Inc.) and were designed using AutoCAD. The thin PDMS sheet was synthesized by spin coating the liquid uncured PDMS (SYLGARD 184, Dow Corning Co., USA) on a salinized glass slide and then baked at 60 °C for 3–4 h. A 2 mm thick PDMS sheet (Specialty Silicone Products Inc., USA) was laser‐cut to a rectangular gasket, which was then bonded with the thin PDMS sheet using thin layer of liquid uncured PDMS (SYLGARD 184, Dow Corning Co., USA) followed by baking at 60 °C for 3–4 h to seal the assembly of thick gasket and thin PDMS sheet. The complete assembly was carefully removed from the salinized glass slide and punched to generate circular through‐holes of appropriate size to finally get the PDMS stencil for cell micropatterning. For generating PDMS stencils with different shapes, the thin PDMS sheets were laser cut using CO2 laser to generate through‐holes of desired shape. Before being used for hPSC micropatterning, the stencil was sterilized by autoclaving at 120 °C for 30 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fabrication of PDMS-based Microfluidic OoC Devices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microfluidic OoC devices were fabricated from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS, Sylgard 184, Dow Corning, Midland, TX, USA) using injection moulding as previously described [23 (link)]. The dimensions of the flow channels were as described previously (1.1 cm × 500 µm × 500 µm; l × w × h). Briefly, PDMS and base agent (Sylgard 184, Dow Corning) was mixed 10:1 (w:w) with curing agent and degassed. The degassed PDMS was transferred to a syringe and further degassed. The injection mould was assembled using six neodymium block magnets (N42, 1.3 T, approximately 60 N per magnet, Webcraft GmbH, Gottmadingen, Germany) and the PDMS was slowly injected. The filled injection-mould was set vertically at room temperature (19–22 °C) overnight. Afterwards, the PDMS was further cured at 75 °C for 60 min. The PDMS was carefully peeled off and excess PDMS was removed using a surgical knife. PDMS devices and round cover glasses (#1.5, ⌀30 mm Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were surface-activated using air plasma (45 s, 50 Watt at 60 Pa, CUTE-Femto Science, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) and contact-bonded using light pressure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fabrication of PDMS Microchannel-Microvessel Device

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microchannels and microvessels were fabricated in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) using soft lithography and replica molding. A layer of photoresistant SU-8 2100 (MicroChem Corp., MA, US) was patterned on a silicon wafer by photolithography, resulting in a positive relief patterns of channels and a series of relief patterns of microvessels. For channels, a prepolymer mixture of Sylgard 184 (Dow Corning, MI, US) was cast and cured against the positive relief master to obtain a negative replica-molded piece. After curing for 2 h at 70°C, the PDMS was peeled off the master, and inlets and outlets of the channel were punched with a sharpened needle. For microvessels, a spin coater (1000 rpm, 10 s) was used to cure a prepolymer mixture of Sylgard 184 (Dow Corning, MI, US) against the positive relief master to obtain a negative replica-molded membrane. After curing for 10 min at 70°C, the membrane was peeled off the master, and the upper surface that had no pattern was adhered to glass. The patterned surfaces of channels and microvessels were treated with oxygen plasma for 1 min with 50 mW, and, subsequently, the microchannel was assembled on top of the microvessels to form an integrated device. The dimensions of an individual microvessel were 72.8 ± 1.36 µm in length and 52.5 ± 0.38 in width, the filled channel kept 9.5 µl in volume in total.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!