The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

69 protocols using r statistical software

1

Analyzing Immunotherapy Adverse Events

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals were estimated through the Cox regression proportional model; in the multivariate approach, a forward stepwise procedure was used, and the enter and remove limits were set to 0.05 and 0.10, respectively. The association of irAE frequency with biological parameters with clinical outcomes in the two patient cohorts was assessed by the chi-square test. Statistics were performed by the SPSS software 23.0 (International Business Machines Corp., New York, NY, USA) and R statistical software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Survival Analysis of Heart Failure Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative variables are expressed as mean ± SD or median or percentile 25 and 75 as required. Categorical variables are expressed as numbers and percentages. A Student's t˗test or the Mann–Whitney U test were used to compare continuous variables, and a χ2 test or the Fischer's exact test were used to compare categorical variables. A Cox proportional‐hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR). For the multivariate analysis, variables with a P‐value greater than 0.10 were removed from the model. Event‐free survival rates were estimated by the method of Kaplan–Meier and compared by the two‐stage hazard rate comparison method9 and the log‐rank test. Analyses were performed with SPSS Statistics for Windows (IBM SPSS Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) and R statistical software (A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R‐project.org/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Predictive Nomogram for Intraoperative Adverse Events

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative data was described as mean ±SD or median (25th–75th); qualitative data was described as n (%). The comparisons between groups for qualitative variables were performed by Chi-square test or Fisher exact test and comparisons between groups for quantitative variables was performed using a t-test or Wilcoxon test. The likelihood ratio test with backward step-down selection was used for the multivariate logistic analysis. The VIFs and Tolerance value were calculated using the “car” package. The ROC curves were plotted using the “pROC” package. Nomogram construction and calibration plots were performed using the “rms” package. A two-sided P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The cut-off probability threshold of the nomogram for the prediction of IAC was determined by maximizing the Youden index. The statistical analysis was conducted using R statistical software (version 3.3.1) and SPSS software for Windows, version 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Nomogram Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software (V4.2.1), IBM SPSS Statistics (V21.0), and Python programming software (V3.7.1). The normally distributed variables were recorded as mean (standard deviation), and compared using the Student’s t-test. All non-normally distributed variables were recorded as [interquartile range (IQR)], and compared using Mann–Whitney U-test. The categorical characteristics were recorded as number (percentage), and compared using the χ2 test. A two-sided P <0.05 was regarded as the statistically significant difference. In the validation of the nomogram model, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve with 1000 bootstrap samples, Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the discrimination, calibration, goodness-of-fit, and clinical usefulness of the nomogram model, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS (version 27, IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, United States) and R statistical software (version 3.6.0, Vienna, Austria). A Student's t‐test was used for continuous variables. A p‐value of < .05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics was presented as frequencies and percentages for categorical data whereas medians and interquartile ranges for continuous data. All analyses were performed using the R statistical software and SPSS (IBM Version 20).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Healthcare Workers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A chi-square test was used to test the differences in the proportion of vaccine confidence, willingness and vaccination uptake among the different demographic groups. Logistic regression models were applied to the total sample and each HCW sub-group separately to detect the different patterns of the relationship between vaccine confidence (X) and willingness (Y). Demographic characteristics were introduced into logistic regression model as covariates. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for detection of the strength of association between study variables.
Participants were further categorized into willing & vaccinated, willing & unvaccinated, unwilling & vaccinated, or unwilling & unvaccinated groups to explore the factors relating to lack of vaccination among the willing population. A logistic regression model was further applied among participants that reported willingness to get vaccinated to explore the effects of vaccine confidence on actual vaccination uptake. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were also calculated and displayed. SPSS (version 22.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and R statistical software (version 3.6.3; appendix p 11) were used for cleaning up the data and statistical analysis. The significance level was considered when the p value was less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multivariate Analysis of Cytokine Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to find correlations among cytokine profile groups and APO, a Factorial analysis of mixed data (FAMD) was performed that combined Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for continuous variables and Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) for categorical variables (Audigier et al., 2016 (link)). Kruskal-Wallis/Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the cytokines between the different groups. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc test was performed to compare the relationship between cytokine/IFN-γ among groups. Spearman rank based pairwise correlation analysis was performed to analyze cytokine abundances in all the groups. R statistical software and IBM-SPSS version 23 were used for all analyses. Heatmaps were made using Morpheus, https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Sepsis Outcomes: Descriptive Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We will use a combination of IBM SPSS Statistics and R Statistical Software for all analyses. We will start with descriptive analyses on baseline characteristics (age, sex, comorbidities, vital sign measurements and other clinical features, blood tests results, baseline EQ5D-5L score), final diagnosis, hospital admission, ICU admission, length of stay, EQ5D-5L compared to baseline, and 30-day mortality. Results will be stratified based on whether patients do or do not meet the primary outcome sepsis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analysis was performed via the R statistical software (R version 4.1.3) and IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 25.0). Normally distributed continuous variables are described as means with standard deviations (SD). The median (M) with interquartile range (IQR, 1st quartile, 3rd quartile) and nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were applied for variable description and comparison, respectively. The categorical variables are reported as the numbers and percentages of patients in each category. Proportions were compared by the Pearson’s Chi-square test. The correlation analysis was performed with Spearman non-parametric correlation tests. All graphs were delineated using GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!