The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Columbus image analysis system

Manufactured by PerkinElmer
Sourced in United States

The Columbus Image Analysis System is a high-performance imaging platform designed for automated microscopy and image analysis. It provides advanced tools for cell-based assays, enabling researchers to acquire, analyze, and manage images efficiently.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using columbus image analysis system

1

Quantifying In Vivo Stem Cell Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For quantification of in vivo stem cell differentiation and Chi3l3 expression analysis, regions of interest around the lateral ventricle were analyzed with a LSM 510 Laser Scanning microscope and LSM 3D analysis software. The periventricular area was defined as the 200 µm adjacent to the ventricular lumen all around the lateral ventricles including the entire width of the corpus callosum directly above the lateral ventricles. Cells labeled with NG2 and/or BrdU were quantified using a × 63 water-immersion objective18 (link). The region of interest around the lateral ventricle labeled with Chi3l3 and/or CD11b was imaged using × 20 objective or × 63 water-immersion objective. Chi3l3 colocalization was analyzed and displayed as ortho-view of a z-stack.
Non-confocal fluorescence analysis was performed using the Operetta® High Content Screening System with a 20xWD or × 60 high NA objective and Columbus Image Analysis System (Perkin Elmer). Mean fluorescence intensity for analysis of phospho-protein staining intensity signal was calculated by automated identification individual cells and subsequent automated mean staining intensity calculation using a Columbus Image Analysis System (Perkin Elmer). A minimum of 100 cells per condition was analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Lipid Droplet Quantification in Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultured cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and 2% sucrose and then stained with Nile red (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and High-Content Screening (HCS) Cell Mask Blue (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Images were acquired using the Opera high-content screening system (20 x confocal lens) and lipid droplets intensity per cell was determined using the Columbus Image Analysis System (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) (Liu et al., 2020 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

High-Content Screening for Nuclear-Cytoplasmic Ratios

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired using the Opera Phenix High-Content Screening System (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Images were acquired with a 40× or 63× objective as confocal z-stacks with a z-step of 1 μm and processed to obtain a maximum intensity projection. A minimum of 12 fields of view were taken for each well. Images were analysed using the Columbus Image Analysis System (PerkinElmer). The nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio of proteins was analysed on a cell-by-cell basis. A DAPI mask was applied to define the nucleus, and a trained machine learning feature selected neurons, removing dead cells and double cells based on nuclei properties. For each individual cell, an average nuclear intensity of the protein was measured. For the cytoplasmic measurement, a 1.5 µm cytoplasmic region was defined around the nucleus within a mask defined by a cytoplasmic protein, and an average intensity was measured. A ratio of the nuclear to cytoplasmic intensity measurements was calculated for each individual cell and then averaged across the well to give the main experimental outcome.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Lysosomal Activity in Neurodegenerative Models

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lysosomal in situ enzyme activity was measured by using lysosome-specific self-quenched substrate (Cat. no. ab234622; Abcam) at manufacturers recommended dosage. In brief, primary mouse cortical neurons were exposed to poly-GA DPRs for 24 h (or were left untreated), and lysosome-specific self-quenched substrate was added during the final 1 h of the 24-h period. Cells were then fixed with 4% PFA at room temperature for 15 min before being imaged with a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope on glass-bottom slides (Ibidi). FIJI was used to analyse the images, and the mean fluorescence intensity of the substrate was quantified per neuronal cell.
Lysosomal staining with the fluorescent acidotropic probe, LysoSensor Green DND-189, was performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (#L7535; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Briefly, HeLa cells on a 96-Well Optical-Bottom Plate (#165305; Thermo Fisher Scientific) were exposed to poly-GA DPRs for 24 h (or were left untreated), and LysoSensor Green was added during the final 1 h of the 24-h period (1 μM final concentration). After incubation, live cells were transferred to the PerkinElmer Opera Phenix high-throughput system for imaging (40× 1.1 NA lens). Using the Columbus Image Analysis System, the mean fluorescence intensity of LysoSensor Green was quantified per cell (PerkinElmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Parkin Mitochondrial Translocation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 10 µL of 0.1 mg/mL Poly-d-Lys solution was added to 384-well plates (Corning #3712) for 5 min, followed by a PBS wash. Plates were dried for at least 2 h; 50 µL of 600000 HEK293 GFP cells/mL of DMEM was dispensed into each well. After 24 h incubation to allow the cells to adhere, 200 nL of small molecules (or DMSO in columns 1, 2, 23 and 24) were pinned. Following a 16-h incubation, 200 nL of 5 mM CCCP was added to all wells except columns 1 and 2, into which 200 nL of DMSO was added. Following 2-h incubation, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and stained with 50 µL of 1 µg/mL DAPI solution for 15 min. After the final PBS wash, plates were ready for high content microscopy.
Images were acquired on IN Cell Analyzer 6000 (GE Healthcare), equipped with sCMOS camera (2048 × 2048), and 20×/0.45 NA Plan Fluor objective (Nikon) in open aperture mode using 1 × 1 binning. Image analysis was performed using Columbus Image Analysis System (PerkinElmer). Nuclei were initially detected in DAPI channel, followed by whole-cell segmentation in GFP channel. Using PhenoLOGIC machine learning plug-in, cells were categorized into two sub-populations: cells with even GFP-Parkin distribution and cells with GFP-Parkin localized to mitochondria. The percentage of cells with mitochondrial GFP-Parkin was determined per well and averaged across two independent trials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating EGFP Intensity and Cell Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were treated for 72 h with DAC or AZA at 1 μM and 5 μM concentrations diluted in appropriate medium and imaged and analyzed to evaluate the intensity of EGFP signal as described elsewhere [31 (link)]. The rate of HCT116 cell proliferation (72 h/24 h) in untreated culture types was determined by counting the total number of RFP-H2B-tagged HCT116 cell nuclei using Columbus Image Analysis System (PerkinElmer), as described previously [31 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Pluripotency Characterization of hESC/iPSC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Various hESC and iPSC lines were dissociated with EDTA for 5 min at 37°C and passaged onto VN-coated plates in E8 Medium containing CEPT up to 44 times. On the last passage, cells were fixed with 4% PFA and stained with anti-OCT4 (Santa Cruz, sc9081, 1:500), SOX2 (Millipore-Sigma, AB5603, 1:500), NANOG (CST, 4903, 1:50), followed by labelling with Alexa-Fluor 488 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21202, 1:500) and Alexa-Fluor 568 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A10042, 1:500) conjugated secondary antibodies. Additionally, cells were also stained with alkaline phosphatase stain II (Stemgent). Quantification of labeled cells was done using the method B algorithm of the Columbus image analysis system (Perkin-Elmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunolabeling of Neural Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunocytochemistry and immunohistochemistry, samples were blocked in 10% normal goat serum (NGS) or 10% normal donkey serum (NDS) as appropriate and permeabilised in 0.3% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich; in PBS) at room temperature (RT) for 1 h. Immunolabelling was performed with primary antibodies in NGS (5%) and Triton X-100 (0.1% in PBS) at 4 °C overnight followed by species-specific secondary antibodies for 1 h at RT and DAPI nuclear counterstain (100 ng/ml) for 10 min at RT. For human post-mortem samples fixation and permeabilisation in cold methanol (−20 °C, 20 min) was performed before the immunostaining. Primary antibodies were diluted as follows: rabbit anti Olig2 (Millipore, AB9610) 1:200; mouse anti SMI32 (Cambridge Bioscience, SMI-32R-500) 1:1000; goat anti ChAT (Millipore, AB144P) 1:100; rabbit anti Pax6 (biolegend, 901301) 1:300; mouse and rabbit anti SFPQ (Abcam, ab11825 and ab38148, respectively) 1:100; mouse and rabbit anti beta-tubulinIII (biolegend, 801201), mouse anti Lim3 (DSHB, 67.4E12) 1:50; chicken anti Nkx2.2 (DSHB, 74.5A5) 1:50. Images were acquired using either a 710 Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope (Zeiss) or the Opera Phenix High-Content Screening System (Perkin Elmer). For image analysis, Fiji or the Columbus Image Analysis System (Perkin Elmer) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Automated Astrocyte Immunocytochemistry Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunocytochemistry, astrocytes were plated onto clear bottom 96 well plates (Falcon). These were fixed with 4% fresh paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature before being washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Samples were then blocked for 1 h at room temperature with 0.3% Triton/PBS/5% goat serum before being incubated overnight with primary antibody in 0.1% Triton/PBS/5% goat serum at 4°C. Primary antibodies used were mouse monoclonal anti-GFAP (Clone G-A-5, 1:500, Sigma-Aldrich) and rabbit anti-cleaved caspase-3 (1:300, Cell Signaling Technology #9661). After three washes in PBS, a secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse, Alexa Fluor 488 or 568, 1:1000) in 0.1% Triton/PBS/5% goat serum was next applied for 1 h at room temperature. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (100 ng/mL).
Images were acquired using the automated Opera Phenix High-Content Screening System (Perkin Elmer). For automated image analysis, the Columbus Image Analysis System (Perkin Elmer) was used. Five non-overlapping fields per well were acquired, and two wells per condition (total >5000 cells) were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunostaining of iPSC-derived Endothelial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
iPSCs were cultured in 6-well plates (Corning) and were differentiated into endothelial cells as described earlier. At day 3 cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at room temperature for 20 min, permeabilized and immunostained following standard protocol using anti-Factor VIII antibody (Abcam, ab236284, 1:200) and fluorescently labeled secondary antibody (Invitrogen, Alexa fluor 546 goat anti-rabbit, 1:500). Additionally, nuclei were labeled with Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen, H3570, 1:5000). Images of cells were automatically captured using an automated Operetta CLS confocal microscope (PerkinElmer) at 20× magnification. Subsequent image capturing was performed using the PerkinElmer Columbus Image Analysis System as previously described63 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!