The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Realplex2

Manufactured by Eppendorf
Sourced in Germany

The Realplex2 is a real-time PCR thermal cycler. It is designed for quantitative gene expression analysis and detection of nucleic acids. The Realplex2 provides precise temperature control and high-sensitivity fluorescence detection for accurate and reliable results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

85 protocols using realplex2

1

Quantitative Bacterial Detection by qPCR and LAMP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 25 μL qPCR mix contained 1× PerfeCTa qPCR ToughMix
(Quanta BioSciences Inc.), 0.25 μM forward primer, 0.25 μM
reverse primer, 0.25 μM TaqMan probe, and 2.5 μL of DNA
template. The primer was targeting the universal bacterial 16s rRNA
gene and their sequences are listed in Table S2. Thermal cycling was performed with Eppendorf RealPlex2 (Hamburg,
Germany). The initialization was 3 min at 95 °C, followed by
40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C for denaturation and 30 s at 55 °C
for annealing/extension.
25 μL qLAMP assay contained 1×
WarmStart LAMP Mastermix, primer mix (1.6 μM FIB and BIP, 0.2
μM F3 and B3, 0.8 μM LF and LB), 1× self-contained
dye, and 2.5 μL of template. The reaction was incubated at 65
°C using Eppendorf RealPlex2. Fluorescence intensity of the reaction
was monitored every minute for 60 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genotyping of rs1800566 Polymorphism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping for rs1800566 was performed in genomic DNA obtained from venous blood samples of participants using TaqMan Assays (C___2091255_30, Life Technologies, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain). Detection was carried out by qPCR in an Eppendorf realplex thermocycler. The amplification conditions were as follows: after a denaturation time of 10 min at 96°C, 45 cycles of 92°C 15 sec 60°C 90 sec were carried out and fluorescence was measured at the end of each cycle and at endpoint. All samples were determined in triplicate and genotypes were assigned both by gene identification software (RealPlex 2.0, Eppendorf, Madrid, Spain) and by analysis of the reference cycle number for each fluorescence curve, calculated by the use of the CalQPlex algorithm (Eppendorf, Madrid, Spain).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of PKM1 and PKM2 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from cultured MCF7 cells and MDA-MB-231 cells by TRizolTM (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. RNA was reverse transcribed by MMLV-RT (Invitrogen) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Amplification reactions were prepared in triplicate using iQTaq SYBR green (Biorad) and amplification was performed on an Eppendorf realplex 2.0 according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The average cycle thresholds from three independent biological replicate samples were calculated as described in Singh et al. with slight modifications [32 ]. Briefly, the average cycle thresholds from three independent biological replicate samples were normalized to housekeeping control gene 18S rRNA. Normalization was performed using 18S rRNA as a normalization control using the formula: [2^ (Ct control − Ct target)]. Along with control gene normalization, constitutive exon (exon 11) normalization was performed for PKM1 (exons 8–9/9) and PKM2 (exons 10–11/11) expression analysis. Student’s t-test was used to compare expression between two different groups. A list of primers used is given in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Real-Time PCR Analysis of Seed Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA (4 µg) was treated with DNase I (Sigma), reverse transcribed with Revertaid Reverse Transcriptase (Fermentas) in a 25 µl reaction volume and amplified with Mastercycler ep Realplex (Eppendorf) using 5 µl of 30-fold diluted cDNA solution. Primers were designed with primer3 software and their respective sequences are shown in Table 1. Real-time PCRs were performed with the MaximaTM SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (Fermentas) and 0.23 mM of each primer (Fermentas) in a 15 µl reaction. Cycle thresholds (Cts) were calculated using the Realplex 2.0 software (Eppendorf). For each plate and each gene, a standard curve made with dilutions of cDNA pools was used to calculate the reaction efficiencies, and the relative expression was calculated according to Hellemans et al. [20] (link) with HaEF1, Haβ-tubulin [12] (link) and HaS19 as reference genes (Table 1). An arbitrary value of 1 was assigned to dormant seed samples, which were used as control samples for normalization [21] (link). Results presented are the means ± SD of three biological replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative PCR Analysis of PCGF1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from cell cultures was prepared by using EasyPure RNA Kit (TransGen Biotech, China), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCGF1 (forward: 5ʹ-TTAAGATGGCGTCTCCTCAGG-3ʹ; reverse: 5ʹ-AGTGGCTGTGTCTCGTGGAT-3ʹ) and GAPDH (forward: 5ʹ-TGACTTCAACAGCGACACCCA-3ʹ; reverse: 5ʹ-CACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAAA-3ʹ) specific primers were used in the qPCR reactions. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate by qPCR with SYBR Green Supermix (Promega, USA) on Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus instruments, with GAPDH as the internal control. Amplification data were collected by Mastercycler ep realplex and analyzed by the realplex2.0 software (Eppendorf, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of E. coli O157:H7 Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Six E. coli O157:H7 strains were selected from feedlot steers that had originally been sampled in California and Texas (from objective 1). Three strains were defined as normal shedders, isolated from cattle with concentrations of <104 MPN/g of feces and three were defined as super-shedders, isolated from cattle with concentrations of ≥104 MPN/g of feces. Each selected strain was also confirmed by Real-time PCR (Realplex 2.2; Eppendorf, Hauppauge, New York, USA) to contain at least one or both Shiga toxin genes (Philpott & Ebel, 2003 , Chapters 1 and 4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PCR Forming Units (PFU) Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Since some target DNA copies serving as templates for a PCR may be damaged or fragmented (e.g., during extraction and freeze-thaw during handling), DNA mass measurements may overestimate copy numbers [29 ]. Hence, the term “PCR forming units” (PFU) was introduced to clearly distinguish between copies being truly amplified during PCR and crude copy number estimates based on the measured DNA amount [30 (link)]. Based on this framework, the number of PFU per standard was calculated following the SIMQUANT assay [29 ]. SIMQUANT assumes a ratio of positive:negative PCR reactions of 7:3 (70% detection) during a series of PCR reactions with approximately 1 PFU. Accordingly, the standard containing 1 PFU was roughly identified and the DNA contents of the remaining standards were successively converted into respective PFU. These values were used to generate a calibration curve, where the mean Ct value for each standard (n = 7) was plotted as a function of the corresponding PFU. Subsequently, the LoD and LoQ were derived following the descriptions in Vrålstad et al. [28 (link)]. For a full description of the calculations for the LoD and LoQ, see S3 File. The software Real Plex 2.2 (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and R for Mac version 3.0.2 [31 ] were used for data analysis and preparation of figures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying IL-2 and GM-CSF Receptor Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To detect the expression of IL-2 receptor and GM-CSF receptor, total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and reversely transcribed using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas, Life Sciences, Ontario, Canada) after DNase I (Fermentas) treatment. The sequence of primers used were as below: for mIL-2Rα, FP: 5′-GCAACTCCCATGACAAATCG-3′, RP: 5′-CCCGGAATACACTCGTAGTGAA-3′; for mGM-CSFRα, FP: 5′-CGTGCATATCCCCACCGTAATA-3′, RP: 5′-TGAAGGCACGTTGGATTTTATGA-3′; for GAPDH, FP: 5′-GCACGGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC-3′, RP: 5′-GCCTTCTCCATGGTGGTGAA-3′. Real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) were performed using the iQ™ SYBR® Green Supermix kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) on Mastercycler ep realplex4 (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Target mRNA quantification was analyzed using the comparative threshold cycle (Ct) method with the software realplex 2.2 (Eppendorf) as described previously [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Yeast Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from yeast cells by the hot phenol method85 . RNA (10 ng) was used with One Step SYBR® Prime ScriptTM Kit II (Perfect Real Time) kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The realplex 2.2 software (Eppendorf) was used to analyse the data and to calculate cycle threshold (Ct) values. Actin1 was taken as housekeeping gene. The change in gene expression was calculated as relative fold change by the comparative Ct method86 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

RNA Extraction, cDNA Synthesis, and qRT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA isolation from cells was performed using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) and c-DNA was synthesized by Improm II reverse transcriptase system (Promega). The absorbance at 260 and 280 nm was measured using NanoDrop ND-1000 UV-Visible Spectrophotometer. A260/A280 ratio of 1.9 to 2.1 indicated good quality of RNA and c-DNA.
Quantitative real time PCR was performed using SYBR Green Supermix (Biorad) in Realplex Real-Time Thermal Cycler (Eppendorf). The profile of thermal cycling consisted of initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, and 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 45 s for primer annealing and extension. Melting curve analysis was used to determine the specific PCR products. The changes in the threshold cycle (CT) values were calculated by the equation: - ∆CT = CT (target gene) - CT (endogenous control gene) and fold difference was calculated as . CT values and melting curves were analyzed on Eppendorf Realplex 2.2 software. GAPDH was used as an internal control to normalize gene expression. Fold change for each treated sample was calculated in comparison with constitutive m-RNA levels of the specific gene and graphs were plotted. Sequences of primers used in the study are listed in the Supplemental Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!