The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using anti cd14 percp cy5

1

Multiparameter flow cytometry and western blotting of immune cell subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies (Abs) used for flow cytometry were anti-IFN-γ-PE-Cy7 (BD Pharmingen); anti-CD66b-FITC, anti-CD33-PE, anti-CD45-PE-Cy7, anti-CD14-PerCP-Cy5.5, anti-HLA-DR-Alexa Fluor 647 and CD8-PerCP-Cy5.5 (eBioscience); anti-perforin-PE, and anti-granzyme B-APC (Biolegend). Abs used for western blotting were anti-human arginase I (R&D Systems) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary ab (Zhongshan Biotechnology). Abs used for IL-6/IL-8 blockade studies were: anti-human IL-6 (Biolegend) and anti-human IL-8 (R&D Systems). The chemical arginase I inhibitor nor-NOHA (Santa Cruz) was also used. Purified anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 Abs (Biolegend) and recombinant human IL-2 (PeproTech) were also used for T cell studies.
Recombinant human IL-6, IL-8, and arginase I (Biolegend) were used for CD45+CD33lowCD11bdim activation studies. Drug inhibitors studies involved the STAT3 inhibitor FLLL32 (Medco Biosciences), PI3K inhibitor Wortmannin, and MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (Calbiochem).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Macrophage Marker and TLR2 Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For expression analysis of macrophage marker surface proteins and TLR2, undifferentiated and differentiated as well as unstimulated and/or pam3CSK4-stimulated cells were resuspended in Flow Cytometry Staining Buffer (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). To block Fc receptors and prevent nonspecific binding of Fc fragments, cells were incubated with Human Fc Receptor Binding Inhibitor Purified (eBioscience). 1 × 106 cells were stained with anti-TLR2-FITC (mouse monoclonal, FAB2616F, R&D); anti-CD11b-FITC (mouse monoclonal, 11-0113, eBioscience); anti-CD11b-APC (mouse monoclonal, 17-0118, eBioscience); anti-CD14-PerCP-Cy5.5 (mouse monoclonal, 45-0149, eBioscience) or with appropriate isotype controls. Flow cytometric analysis was performed on LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) instrument and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc.). Since these experiments were performed for quality control reasons, to demonstrate the proper molecular characteristics of our cellular models, we do not include these results as figures in the results section. Representative flow cytometry histograms may be found in supplementary material as Supplementary Figure 1 (differentiation markers) and Supplementary Figure 2 (TLR2 expression).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophage Isolation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone marrow derived-macrophages were isolated according to previously published methods(60) and differentiated in the presence of L929 conditioned media for 8 days as per standard protocols. After 8 days the cells were incubated with 4 mg/ml lidocaine (Sigma) for 15 min at 4°C and gently lifted using a cell lifter. Cells were then centrifuged, counted and re-suspended in medium at a concentration appropriate for measurement of cytokine production, bacterial uptake, flow cytometry or bacterial killing assays. Macrophage maturation was assessed by flow cytometry using APC-conjugated anti-F4/80, PE-conjugated anti-Ly6G or -CCR2, FITC-conjugated Ly6C, eFluor 450-conjugated CD45 and PE-Cy7-conjugated CD11b, or corresponding isotype controls. Pattern recognition receptor (PRR) expression was measured using anti-TLR4-FITC, anti-TLR2-PE-Cy7 and anti-CD14-PerCpCy5.5 (eBioscience), as well as anti-MARCO-PE (RND systems). To visualize S. pneumoniae uptake by macrophages, TRITC labeled bacteria were incubated with bone marrow derived macrophages for 2h at an MOI of 200. Cells were fixed and stained using an anti-beta actin antibody (Cell Signaling). Images were acquired at 40X magnification using an inverted Zeiss LSM510 laser confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole blood samples (3 ml) were collected in EDTA-treated tubes and MDSCs were analysed by flow cytometry (FACS Calibour, BD, USA). Whole blood samples were then stained with anti-CD11b APC (BD Biosciences, CA, USA), anti-HLA-DR PE (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-CD14 PerCP-cy5.5 (eBioscience) and anti-CD15 FITC (BD Biosciences) for 30 min in the dark as described before (15, 16) . Cells were then washed and suspended in FACS buffer before 20,000 events were analysed by FACS. The gating strategy was CD11b+/HLA-DR-/dim and within this population CD14+/CD15-cells and CD14-/CD15+ were identified as described previously (15, 16) .
Flow cytometry analysis was calculated as the frequency (percentage) of the respective subset of leukocytes and the data was subsequently analysed by FlowJO-V10 software (USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three ml whole blood in EDTA were obtained from all participants and MDSCs were analysed by ow cytometry (FACS Calibour, BD, USA). Brie y, blood samples were then stained with anti-CD11b APC (BD Biosciences, CA, USA), anti-HLA-DR PE (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-CD14 PerCP-cy5.5 (eBioscience) and anti-CD15 FITC (BD Biosciences) for 30 min in the dark as described before (19, (link)20) (link). Cells were then washed and suspended in FACS buffer before 20,000 events were analysed by FACS. The gating strategy was CD11b+/HLA-DR-/dim and within this population CD14+/CD15-cells and CD14-/CD15+ were identi ed as described previously (19, (link)20) (link). Flow cytometry data was subsequently analysed by FlowJO-V10 software (USA) and reported as the frequency (percentage) of the respective subset of leukocytes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!