The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using did dye

1

In vivo Trafficking of Targeted Drug Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vivo trafficking of TDNPs was demonstrated using DiD‐labeled TDNPs. TDNPs (100 µg per 100 µL per mouse) were first labeled with a DiD dye (Invitrogen, USA, 1 µL DiD dye + 100 µL PBS). The mixture was ultrafiltered several times to remove unbound dye and then resuspended in PBS. The dorsal skin of the diabetic mice (see more details in the section on “diabetic wound healing evaluation”) was scratched using a blunt blade to induce skin damage. Subsequently, the wounded skin was treated with TAG shielded from light for various time points. As controls, the equivalent DiD dye in PBS was ultrafiltered, and the resulting solution was suspended in PBS to treat the mice. The mice were imaged using a multiphoton laser‐scanning microscope (FV1200MPE, Olympus, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tracking BCN Biodistribution In Vivo

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BCN were loaded with DiD dye (Thermo Fisher) and administered to mice IT at 4 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 6 days, and 6 weeks prior to the final time point, at which all mice were sacrificed and analyzed together. Lung, spleen, and draining lymph nodes were harvested and imaged using a near-IR in vivo Imaging System (IVIS; Center for Advanced Molecular Imaging, Northwestern University). The single-cell suspension was then prepared from indicated organs and cells were stained for flow cytometric analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Biodistribution of DiD-labeled BCN

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BCN was loaded with DiD dye (Thermo Fisher) and administered to mice IT at 4 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr, 6 days, and 6 weeks prior to the final time point, at which all mice were sacrificed and analyzed together. Lung, spleen, and draining lymph nodes were harvested and imaged using a near-IR in vivo Imaging System (IVIS; Center for Advanced Molecular Imaging, Northwestern University). The single-cell suspension was then prepared from indicated organs and cells were stained for flow cytometric analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying LRNV Uptake in HUVECs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HUVECs were grown to
90% confluence in 48-well tissue culture-treated plates. LRNVs were
labeled with DiI or DiD dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Dyes were
added to LRNVs at a final concentration of 1.67 μM and incubated
at 37 °C for 10 min. Excess DiI was removed using Nanosep centrifugal
ultrafiltration devices with Omega membranes (100 kDa MWCO, Pall OD100C34).
To control for excess DiI micelles, the same procedure was conducted
with the DiI dye alone with the LRNV sample volume replaced with 1×
PBS instead. 5 × 108 LRNV particles were added to
each well and incubated for 4, 6, or 24 h. At the end of the timepoint,
media was aspirated and replaced with fresh media supplemented with
20 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific #62249) and
imaged using a Carl Zeiss Axio Observer D1 inverted microscope. Particle
uptake was assessed semiquantitatively using ImageJ. Before analysis,
intensities of the control-DiI group were subtracted from the LRNV
group at each timepoint to account for background. For representative
images, cells were plated in eight-well chamber slides (Labtek), fixed
with formalin for 20 min at room temperature (RT), and stained with
DAPI before being mounted and imaged using a Nikon C2 scanning laser
microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Biohybrid Scaffold for Bone Regeneration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA), hydroxyapatite (HAp), LiBr, APS, TEMED, FITC, and DAPI were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Phalloidin, DiD dye, and live/dead kit were purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific. All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise indicated. RUNX2, OCN, OPG, and BSP antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz (USA). The raw silks were obtained from Simatech Co. (JiangSu, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Flow cytometric analysis of DC-T cell trogocytosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD11C+MHC-II+ lung DCs were sorted by flow cytometry. 5 µg/mL DiD dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added to 1 × 106/mL DCs suspended in serum-free RPMI 1640 medium. The DCs were incubated for 20 min at 37 °C and washed twice with RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS. To investigate the trogocytosis process directly, we cocultured 5 × 105 GFP+ OVA DNTs and DiD-labeled DCs for 24 h at a ratio of 1:1 in a 24-well plate. For confocal microscopy, the antibodies used were rabbit anti-mouse Lag3 antibody (Abcam) and mouse-purified anti-mouse I-Ab (Biolegend), and DAPI was used as a nuclear stain (Molecular Probes). Donkey anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 546 and donkey anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 647 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used to detect the primary Abs. Confocal analysis was conducted using a confocal laser scanning microscope (FLUOVIEW FV1000, Olympus). The image data were acquired by FV10-ASW 4.2 microscopy software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fluorescent Labeling of Small Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
100 μL of sEVs suspension (∼1 × 1010 particles/mL) was incubated with fluorescein conjugated antibody for 30 min at 37°C and then stained with plasma membrane fluorescent probe, DiD dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific, V22887, 1:100) for 30 min at 37°C, protected from light. The following antibodies were used: AF488 anti‐human PODXL Antibody (Abcam, ab208254, 1:20), AF488 anti‐human SSEA‐4 Antibody (BioLegend, 330411, 1:20). Afterward, the sEVs were washed with PBS using ultracentrifugation at 100,000 × g for 17 min at 4°C (Beckman Coulter MAX‐XP centrifuge, MLA‐150 rotor). Images were obtained using an IXplore SpinSR Super Resolution Microscope System (Olympus, Japan) and further processed with Imaris software (version 9.8.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Identifying Proliferating Cells using DiD Dye

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
hTERT+-AM cells were stained with DiD dye (Thermo Fisher, Cat#V22887), according to the manufacturer’s directions. The DiD dye was lost as cells divided, which allowed highly proliferating cells to be identified and distinguished from slowly dividing cells.54 (link)–56 (link) Briefly, 1 mL serum-free DMEM containing 1×106 cells was incubated with DiD dye (1:200) at 37 °C for 10 minutes. After washing three times, the cells were plated in the sterile cell culture dishes and passaged every 2 days. After 10 days, the DiDhigh AM cells and DiDlow AM cells were sorted by a FACSVantage instrument (BD FACSAriaFusion) and used for the functional experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Vesicle Transfer Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The number of vesicles transferred was quantitated using a vesicle transfer assay.20 (link),41 (link) Briefly, one flask of confluent TM cells was trypsinized, and half was labeled with Vybrant DiO dye (488 nm), while the other half was labeled with DiD dye (647 nm; ThermoFisher). After washing, fluorescently labeled cells were mixed 1:1, plated at 1 × 105 cells/mL, and incubated overnight. For NTM/GTM coculture assays, NTM (n = 5) cells were labeled with DiO and incubated with DiD-labeled GTM (n = 6) cells. Cells were then fixed and immunostained with CD44 monoclonal antibody and imaged by confocal microscopy. The total number of DiO (green) and DiD (red) cells were counted in each image. In addition, the number of TM cells containing at least five vesicles of the opposite color “transferred vesicles” was counted. For GTM/NTM cocultures, the percentage of green NTM cells containing red GTM-derived vesicles was calculated, and vice versa.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Visualization of Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells cultured for 1 day were fixed with a 3% glutaraldehyde solution. For confocal microscopy, the cells were labeled with DiD dye (D307; Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and visualized at a 633 nm wavelength using a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). For scanning electron microscopy, the fixed cells were washed 3 times with deionized water, followed by dehydration with an ethanol gradient (50%, 70%, 90% and 99%) and hexamethyldisilazane treatment (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The cells were visualized at an acceleration voltage of 5–10 keV in secondary electrons (SE) mode at various magnifications using a Hitachi SU8000 microscope (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!