The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Polyclonal anti flag

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Canada

Polyclonal anti-FLAG is a laboratory reagent used to detect and purify proteins that have been engineered to contain a FLAG tag sequence. The anti-FLAG antibody specifically binds to the FLAG tag, allowing the tagged protein to be identified and isolated from complex mixtures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using polyclonal anti flag

1

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blotting of Flag-Tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK 293T whole cell extracts were prepared using lysis buffer containing 1%TX-100 as previously described (Lamia et al., 2004 (link)). Immunoprecipitation was performed using anti-Flag M2 agarose beads (Sigma #A2220). Antibodies for Western Blots were anti-Flag polyclonal (Sigma cat #F7425), anti-V5 polyclonal (Bethyl Labs cat# A190-120A), anti-βActin (Sigma cat #A1978), anti-Cry1-CT and anti-Cry2-CT as described (Lamia et al., 2011 (link)). Anti-PPARδ antibody was raised in guinea pig using a peptide containing the first twenty amino acids of mouse PPARδ (Fan et al., 2017 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Co-Immunoprecipitation of HEK293T Cell Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK 293T whole cell extracts for co-IP were prepared using lysis buffer containing 1%TX-100, 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 138 mM KCl, 4 mM NaCl, 50 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 100 mM sodium fluoride, 10 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA pH 8, 50 μM PMSF, 1 mM β-Glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and protease inhibitors (Thermo Scientific cat # 88265) as previously described (Lamia et al., 2004). Immunoprecipitation was performed using anti-Flag M2 agarose beads (Sigma cat #A2220). Antibodies for Western Blots were anti-FLAG polyclonal (Sigma cat #F7425), anti-V5 polyclonal (Bethyl Labs cat# A190–120A), anti-HA polyclonal (Sigma cat # H6908), anti-α-TUBULIN (Sigma cat # T5168), anti-E2F1 (Santa Cruz KH95), anti-E2F8 (Abcam ab109596), CRY1-CT and CRY2-CT11 (link). For CHX assay, HEK293T cells were lysed with a RIPA Buffer containing 1% TX-100, 147 mM NaCl, 12 mM Sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA, 50 μM PMSF, 1 mM β-Glycerophosphate, 1 mM Sodium Orthovanadate and protease inhibitors (Thermo Scientific cat # 88265).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Interaction of STX17, BAP31, and ATG14L

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were cultured on poly-L-lysine coated coverslips and fixed in 4% formaldehyde and permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100. The primary antibodies included an anti-STX17 polyclonal, anti-FLAG polyclonal (Sigma), anti-BAP31 monoclonal (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and anti-ATG14L monoclonal (MBL Lifescience, Tokyo, Japan) antibodies. The secondary antibodies were fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated for rabbit IgG and Rhodamine Red or FITC-conjugated for mouse Immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Molecular Probes, Hampton, NH, USA). The DAPI stained nuclei (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). An in situ proximity ligation assay (PLA) and immunofluorescence were performed to detect the BAP31 and STX17 or STX17 and ATG14L interactions using primary antibodies and a Duolink II Detection Kit with PLA PLUS and MINUS Probes for rabbit and mouse according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Olink Bioscience, Uppsala, Sweden). All images were obtained under a confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and processed using Adobe Photoshop software (CS6; Adobe, San Jose, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Preparation and Immunoblotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
293T whole cell extracts and mouse liver lysates were prepared using Lysis buffer containing 1%TX-100 as previously described (Lamia et al., 2004 (link)). MEF cell extracts were prepared from RIPA buffer containing 1% TX-100, 147 mM NaCl, 12 mM sodium deoxycolate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA, 50 μM PMSF, phosphatase inhibitors (cat #P5266 and cat #P0044; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and protease inhibitor (cat #11697498001; Roche, Switzerland). For ubiquitination experiments, iodoacetamide was added to the buffer to a final concentration of 5 mM (Fisher AC122270050).
Antibodies were anti-Flag M2 agarose beads, anti-Flag polyclonal, anti-v5 polyclonal, anti-Lamin A, anti-aTubulin, and anti-βactin from Sigma, anti-Hausp and anti-V5 from Bethyl Labs (Montgomery, TX, cat #A300-033A and cat #A190-120A), anti-53BP1 from Novus Biologicals (Littleton, CO, NB100-304), Cry1-CT and Cry2-CT as described (Lamia et al., 2011 (link)), anti-p21 from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies (Dallas, TX, cat #sc-6246), anti-p53 as previously described (Pasini et al., 2004 (link)), and anti-Ubiquitin, anti-phospho-P53 (S15), and anti-phosphoATM/ATR substrate (phospho-SQ/TQ) from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA). Anti-Cry1-phosphoS588 antibody was affinity purified from rabbit antisera raised against a phospho-S588 containing peptide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Whole Cell Extract Preparation for Immunoprecipitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
293 T whole cell extracts were prepared using lysis buffer containing 1%TX-100, 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 138 mM KCl, 4 mM NaCl, 50 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 100 mM sodium fluoride, 10 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA pH 8, 50 μM PMSF, 1 mM β-Glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and protease inhibitors (Roche cat # 11697498001 or Thermo Scientific cat # 88265) as previously described (Lamia et al.40 (link)). ASF cell extracts were prepared from RIPA buffer containing 1% TX-100, 147 mM NaCl, 12 mM sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA, 50 μM PMSF, 1 mM β-Glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM sodium fluoride, and protease inhibitors (Thermo Scientific cat # 88265). Antibodies used for immunoprecipitation were anti-FLAG M2 agarose beads (Sigma cat # A2220) and monoclonal anti-HA agarose beads (Sigma cat # A2095). Antibodies for Western blot were anti-FLAG polyclonal (Sigma cat # F7425), anti-HA polyclonal (Sigma cat # H6908), anti-MYC polyclonal (Sigma cat # C3956), anti-SKP1 (BD Biosciences cat # BDB610530), anti-CUL1 (Life Technologies cat # 71–8700), anti-αTubulin (Sigma cat # T5168), anti-βactin (Sigma cat # A1978), anti-AFG3L2[N1N2] (GeneTex cat # GTX102036), and CRY1-CT and CRY2-CT as described (Lamia et al., 2011).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were separated by SDS/PAGE, and proteins were transferred on to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked with TBST (20 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20) containing 5% skim milk for 1 h. The blot was then incubated with primary antibody at 4°C overnight and washed thrice with TBST. This was followed by incubating with secondary antibody for 1 h, washed again with TBST, and finally developed through enhanced chemiluminescence. The primary antibodies used in the study included mAb 7H6 (as described above), anti-GAPDH polyclonal (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-FLAG polyclonal (Sigma) antibodies. Secondary antibodies used were HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse and goat anti-rabbit IgG (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Dyrk1A Interactome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pCI/Dyrk1A and its deletion mutants were constructed and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. pCI/Dyrk1As were tagged with FLAG at the C‐terminus. pCEP4/ASF‐HA, pCEP4/SC35‐HA, and pCEP4/SRp55‐HA were kind gifts from Dr. Tarn of the Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taiwan. The Bcl‐x mini‐gene, comprising Bcl‐x exons 2 and 3 and intron 2 was a gift from Dr. Jianhua Zhou of the University of Massachusetts Medical School. pCEP4/ASFS3A‐HA, ASF was mutated at Ser‐227, Ser‐234, and Ser‐238 to three Ala, as described previously.
25 (link) Small inference RNAs (siRNAs) of Dyrk1A and ASF, and Monoclonal anti‐Bcl‐xL were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Monoclonal antibody 8D9 was raised against a histidine‐tagged protein containing the first 160 residues of rat Dyrk1A.
31 (link) The monoclonal anti‐HA, polyclonal anti‐FLAG, and monoclonal anti‐Dyrk1A (N‐terminal) were purchased from Sigma. Polyclonal Bcl‐xS, and monoclonal anti‐NeuN were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated secondary antibodies were obtained from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA). Enhanced chemiluminescence ECL kit was bought from Thermo Fisher Scientific.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were obtained commercially: anti-γ-tubulin, polyclonal anti-FLAG, anti-Cyclin A, monoclonal anti-FLAG M2, anti-α-tubulin and anti-acetylated-α-tubulin (all from Sigma, St. Louis, MO), anti-Cyclin E, anti-CDK2 phospho-Thr160, anti-Akt and anti-Akt phospho-Thr308 (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA), anti-centrin 20H5 (Millipore, Billerica, MA), polyclonal anti-β-catenin and anti-GSK3β (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-Ku70 (Genetex, Trvine, CA), anti-DNA-PKcs, and anti-DNA-PKcs phospho-Thr 2609 (Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA). The immune sera against SF-1 have been described previously [19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Whole Cell Protein Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain whole cell extract, NSPCs were harvested in RIPA buffer containing 320 mM sucrose, 50 mM TRIS pH 7.5, 1% Triton, 10% glycerol and 1% of inhibitor of proteases cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich), incubated on ice for 30 min and centrifuged for 12 min at 13,000× g. Protein amount was quantified by Bradford assay (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) and 10 or 20 µg of protein was subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred overnight onto polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Immobilion-PSQ; Millipore) [82 (link)]. Membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat dry milk and then incubated with the following primary antibodies: monoclonal anti-FUS (1:750; Santa-Cruz), polyclonal anti-FLAG (1:750; Sigma-Aldrich), monoclonal anti-PCNA (1:750; Sigma-Aldrich), polyclonal anti-Cdk2 (1:400, Santa Cruz), polyclonal anti-DCX (1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and polyclonal anti-PAX6 (1:200; BioLegend). Blots were washed and incubated with the appropriate horseradish peroxidase secondary antibodies (1:10.000, Jackson Immunoresearch). Blots were then washed again, incubated in lumi-light enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (BioRad) and exposed to chemidoc (BioRad). Densitometric analysis on scanned blots was performed using the ImageLab program (BioRad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibody Detection in Cell Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The anti-peptide polyclonal antibody raised against the C-terminal region of the human a-SMN (#910) was prepared in rabbits in 2005 by NeoMPS (Strasbourg, France; diluted 1:500 for IF). The specific antibody samples used in this study have been previously described [13 (link)]. Mouse anti-tag (anti-Xpress), revealing transfected proteins only, was purchased from Life Technologies (diluted 1:500 for WB and IF experiments), polyclonal anti-Flag from Sigma-Aldrich (diluted 1:500 for IF); anti-SMN clone 8 from BD Transduction Laboratories (diluted 1:20,000 for WB); mouse anti-actin from Millipore (diluted 1:5,000 for WB); mouse anti-neurofilament 200 (NF-200) from Sigma-Aldrich (diluited 1:500 for IF).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!