The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using gel extraction kit

1

TOPO Cloning of Genomic DNA Loci

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 250 ng genomic DNA was used for the TOPO cloning experiment. The knock-in events were amplified using specific TA colony primers targeting the DYNLT1 or HSP90AA1 locus (the primers are listed in Supplementary Table 4) using Phusion flash high-fidelity PCR master mix (Thermo Scientific, F-548L). The PCR products were purified using a gel extraction kit (New England BioLabs, T1020L) following the manufacturer’s instructions. A poly(A) tail was added to the purified products using Taq polymerase (New England BioLabs, M0273S) with incubation at 72 °C for 30 min. The TOPO cloning reaction was set up and the transformation was performed following the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Scientific, K457501). The plates were sent for rolling-circle amplification/colony sequencing using the M13F (5′-GTAAAACGACGGCCAG-3′) and M13R (5′-CAGGAAACAGCTATGAC-3′) universal Sanger sequencing primers. The sequence results were analysed using the SnapGene software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cloning VEGFA-eGFP Construct in pOET6 Vector

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The human VEGFA in a pcDNA3.1 + eGFP vector was purchased from GenScript. The EGFP-tagged VEGFA gene was excised from the original plasmid using EcoRI and XbaI Fast Digest restriction enzymes (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The resultant genes of interest were run on a 1% (m/v) agarose gel containing SYBR Green (Thermo Fisher) at 100 Volts. After one hour, the DNA bands were visualized using a blue light transilluminator (miniPCR bio, Boston, MA, USA). Each gene fragment was excised and purified using NEB’s Gel Extraction Kit. The genes of interest were each ligated, using Instant Sticky End Ligase (NEB), into the pOET6 plasmid with compatible sticky ends. The VEGFA-eGFP-pOET6 plasmid was then chemically transformed into DH5alpha E. coli (Thermo Fisher) and selected for using the ampicillin resistance present within the pOET6 plasmid (MJS BioLynx Inc., Brockville, ON, Canada). Several different LB agar plates were streaked with different dilutions of the transformed bacteria and grown overnight. The next day, the resistant colonies containing the gene of interest were selected and grown overnight to amplify the plasmid. The plasmid was then extracted and purified using NEB’s plasmid purification kit. The resultant purified pOET6 plasmid, each with a gene of interest, was used for all future virus production steps or frozen at −20 °C for future use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Targeted TOPO Cloning for Genetic Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total of 250 ng gDNA was used for the TOPO cloning experiment. The knock-in events were amplified using specific TA colony primers targeted to DYNLT1 or HSP90AA1 locus (primers are listed in Supplementary Table 4) using Phusion Flash High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix (ThermoScientific, F-548L). The PCR products were purified using Gel extraction kit (New England BioLabs, T1020L) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified products were added with a-tail using Taq polymerase (New England BioLabs, M0273S) through incubate at 72 °C for 30 minutes. Set up the TOPO cloning reaction and perform the transformation following the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Scientific, K457501). Send the colony plates for RCA/colony sequencing using M13F (5´-GTAAAACGACGGCCAG-3´) and M13R (5´-CAGGAAACAGCTATGAC-3´) universial Sanger sequencing primers. The sequence results were analyzed using SnapGene software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Site-Directed Mutagenesis Protocol for CIDEA Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CIDEA WT and point-mutation (R47E and R171E) constructs were previously generated as detailed in Barneda et al.27 (link). Insertion fragments were amplified by PCR (list of primers can be found in Supplementary Data 1), purified by PCR purification kit (Roche, 11732676001), followed by restriction enzyme digestion. Digested fragments with sticky ends were purified by gel electrophoresis and extracted by gel extraction kit (NEB, T1020S). Purified inserts were ligated to pre-digested pPyCAGIP plasmids by DNA ligase (NEB, M020S) at 16 °C overnight. Ligation product was transformed into DHFalpha competent bacterial cells and amplified. Bacteria culture was lysed, and plasmids purified by midiprep plasmid extraction kits (Invitrogen, K210004), followed by Sanger sequencing for verification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing efficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After incubation with NBs, murine organoids were grown for 9 days. gDNA was extracted using a gDNA extraction kit (Macherey-Nagel). Primers were designed to amplify approximately 400–700 bp of the region targeted by the guide RNAs (Table S5). gDNA (50 ng) was used for PCR amplification. The size of the PCR fragments was checked using an agarose gel. PCR fragments were then purified using a gel extraction kit (New England Biolabs) and subjected to Sanger sequencing. Sequencing results were analyzed for the percentage of INDEL using ICE (https://ice.synthego.com/#/) or DECODR (https://decodr.org/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Detecting extrachromosomal DNA using nested PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA samples from five million cells were prepared using the Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit (69504). Genomic DNA was diluted to 100 ng/μl prior to its use for PCR. Nested PCR, involving two sequential amplification reactions, was used to generate DNA fragments with ecDNA junctions. Primers used for PCR reactions were: PCR1 (5’ GGATTAAGTCGTCCGCAGTC 3’ and 5’AGGAACCTGAAGCTCTATGTGA 3’), PCR2 (5’ TGGCTGTCTGTTCTCTCCAG 3’ and 5’ CTTGGCCAAGCACAGAACTC 3’). Settings for PCR1 reaction: 1. Initial denaturation 95°C / 5min, 2. Denaturation 94°C / 40 s, 3. Annealing 60°C / 40 sec, 4. Elongation 72°C 1min, 39 repeat for steps 2 to 4 and final extension for 10 min at 72°C. The reaction volume was 25 μl. Settings for PCR2 reaction: 1. Initial denaturation 95°C / 5min, 2. Denaturation 94°C / 40 s, 3. Annealing 59°C / 40 sec, 4. Elongation 72°C 1min 10sec, 39 repeat steps for 2 to 4 and final extension for 10 min at 72°C. The reaction volume was 50 μl. Fragment from PCR2 was isolated and purified from agarose gel using a gel extraction kit (New England Biolabs, cat# T1020S), following the manufacturer instructions. Sanger sequencing of the Junction was performed using the primers 5’ ATGCAGAATCCAGCAGCCCC 3’ and 5’ AACAGTGATTGGCCCAGGGG 3’.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In Vitro Transcription Assay for PydiU and HyaA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA fragments containing PydiU, PhyaA, or their mutant derivatives were isolated from the relevant plasmids following digestion with BamHI and HindIII. The 3′ end of the top strand was radiolabeled with [α-32P]dGTP (PerkinElmer) using Klenow fragment. The radiolabeled fragment was isolated from a 5% acrylamide gel, purified using a QIAquick gel extraction kit, and incubated with either 100 nM E. coli RNA polymerase with σ70 (NEB), 500 nM purified WT IscR, or both for 30 min at 37°C in a solution containing 40 mM Tris (pH 7.9), 30 mM KCl, 100 μg/ml BSA, and 1 mM DTT. A total of 2 μg/ml of DNase I (Worthington) was added to the reaction mix for 30 s, followed by the addition of sodium acetate and EDTA to final concentrations of 300 and 20 mM, respectively, to terminate the reaction. The reaction mix was ethanol precipitated, resuspended in urea loading dye, heated for 60 s at 90°C, and loaded onto a 7 M urea–8% polyacrylamide gel in 0.5× TBE buffer. An A+G ladder was made by formic acid modification of the radiolabeled DNA, followed by piperidine cleavage (53 (link)). The gels were visualized using a Typhoon FLA-9000 gel imaging scanner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Constructing Mutant hmw1AB Clones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oligonucleotide primers were designed to amplify DNA encoding hmw1AB incorporating NcoI and SacI restriction sites. PCR amplicons were digested with NcoI and SacI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts), purified using the Sigma-Aldrich gel extraction kit, and ligated into NcoI and SacI-digested pET28a(+). Cloning with NcoI caused a D 2 N substitution in HMW1A, which was reverted to the native sequence using site-directed mutagenesis (57) .
The pBad-HMW1C plasmid previously constructed by Gawthorne (2014) (58) was used for this study. Site-directed mutagenesis (57) was used to introduce an S 1046 T point mutation in HMW1A and to delete sequence encoding the HMW1A signal sequence (amino acids 1-68). Top10 E. coli cells transformants were selected by growth on LB plates with kanamycin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Recombinant Protein Expression in E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents were purchased from commercial sources and used as received. Primers were ordered from Sigma-Aldrich. The Escherichia coli strain (DH5α) for cloning was obtained from New England Biolabs. E. coli strain LMG194 for recombinant protein expression was obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific and made chemically competent by CaCl2 treatment. Restriction enzymes, T4 DNA ligase, Q5 DNA polymerase, the Gibson assembly kit, and DNase I were obtained from New England Biolabs. PCR cleanup, plasmid DNA miniprep, and gel extraction kits were also from New England Biolabs. Columns for purification were from Bio-Rad. Protein gel electrophoresis was carried out using Bio-Rad 4–20% Mini-PROTEAN TGX Stain-Free Protein Gels. Gels were imaged on a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc Touch Imaging System. Fast protein liquid chromatography was carried out on a Bio-Rad NGC Quest 10 chromatography system. Ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) absorption spectra were obtained on an Agilent Cary 100 UV–Vis spectrophotometer, and fluorescence spectra were obtained on an Agilent Eclipse spectrofluorimeter using quartz cuvettes (Starna cells) with 1 cm path lengths. To remove adventitious metal ions, all buffers used for spectroscopy were treated with Chelex-100 resin (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s batch protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genotyping of Plasmodium falciparum Circumsporozoite Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the amplification of the msp1 gene, P. falciparum were sorted out to exclude multiclonal infection since multiple clonal infections produce multiple products of pfcsp, which later give non-specific sequencing results. Genomic DNA of single clonal infections were further used for the amplification of pfcsp. The pfcsp gene amplification was done as previously published by Zeeshan et al. [9 (link)]; using the following primers; outer PfCSP-f: 5′ TTA GCT ATT TTA TCT GTT TCT TC 3′ and outer PfCSP-r: 5′ TAA GGA ACA AGA AGG ATA ATA CC 3′, for the first PCR reaction. The second PCR reaction was made using the primers; nested nPfCSP-f: 5′ GAA ATG AAT TAT TAT GGG AAA CAG 3′ and nPfCSP-r: 5′ GAA GGA TAA TAC CAT TAT TAA TCC 3′. PCR amplicons of the first run were used as a template for the second PCR. The amplified pfcsp products were visualized using agarose gel electrophoresis in comparison to a 100 base pair DNA ladder. Amplified PfCSP PCR products were further purified from gel using gel extraction kits and instructions were followed according to the manufacturer’s guidelines (New England Biolabs Inc, New England). Each amplicon was sent in replicate for sequencing by the Sanger dideoxy sequencing method using the primer SeqPfCSP: 5′ TGG GTC ATT TGG CAT ATT GTG 3′ using ABI3500 sequencer (Applied Biosystems SeqStudio, 3500 series) provided by Macrogen Inc. (The Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!