The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gradient sds page gel

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States, France

4–20% gradient SDS-PAGE gels are a type of polyacrylamide gel used for the separation of proteins based on their molecular weight. These gels have a continuous gradient of polyacrylamide concentration from 4% to 20%, allowing for the effective separation of a wide range of protein sizes in a single gel.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

207 protocols using gradient sds page gel

1

Quantification of Polyubiquitinated Substrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 10 OD600 units of yeast grown to log phase in selection media was harvested and lysed mechanically using zirconium beads (BioSpec Products). Cell lysates were precipitated and prepared with TCA precipitation as above. Small equal volumes of each lysate sample were resolved on a 4–15% gradient SDS-PAGE gel (Biorad) and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Biorad) for quantification and normalization of HA-tagged substrates in each sample with immunoblot. Normalized volumes of proteins were immunoprecipitated with the anti-HA affinity matrix (Roche). Proteins were resolved on a 4–15% gradient SDS-PAGE gel (Biorad) and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Biorad), autoclaved and immunoblotted for polyubiquitinated substrates. The membrane was scanned with the Odyssey Li-Cor Imaging System and the bands were quantified with ImageJ (Schindelin et al. 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Lysates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein lysates collected for western blot were clarified by centrifugation at 20,800g for 10 min, followed by quantification using the detergent‐compatible protein assay (BioRad, Hercules, CA) with BSA as a standard. Samples were mixed with 5X loading dye (bromophenol blue, 5% SDS, 30% glycerol, 250 mmol/L Tris‐HCl pH 6.8), boiled for 10 min, resolved on 4–12% gradient SDS‐PAGE gels (BioRad), and transferred to nitrocellulose (BioRad). Blots were blocked, incubated overnight at 4°C in primary antibody as per the manufacturer's instructions (Sp1 antibody, Cat#9389, Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA; Sp3 antibody, Cat#sc‐644, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), incubated in secondary antibody (Anti‐rabbit HRP, Cat#111‐035‐144, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) for 1 h at room temperature, and developed using Immobilon western chemiluminescent HRP substrate (Millipore, Etobicoke, ON). Images of western blots were captured using QuantityOne software on the BioRad ChemiDoc XRS System and quantified by densitometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Liver Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver samples were homogenized in ice‐cold RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris‐HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.25% deoxycholic acid, and 1% NP‐40) in the presence of protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Thermo‐Fisher). Total sample lysates were centrifuged for 15 minutes at 10 163 g and supernatant were mixed with 6x reducing SDS buffer (Alfa‐Aesar) and boiled at 100°C for 5 minutes. Protein samples (30 μg) were loaded and separated on gradient SDS‐PAGE gels (Bio‐Rad) and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked for 1 h with 5% non‐fat milk in 1× TBS supplemented with 0.1% Tween20 (Bio‐Rad) and incubated with the following antibodies: GLS2 (Novus Biologicals, NBP1‐76544), GLUD1 (ThermoFisher Scientific, PA5‐19267), OTC (Abcam, ab203859), and GAPDH (Cell Signaling, 2118 L). Bound antibodies were detected using horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated anti‐rabbit or anti‐goat secondary antibodies (1:10 000; Jackson ImmunoResearch) and enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (Thermo‐Fisher). Band intensities were quantified with ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

WDR62 Mutant Immunoprecipitation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% fetal calf serum and transiently transfected with V5-tagged WT or mutant forms of WDR62 along with AURKB-3xMyc using Lipofectamine (Life Technologies, NY). 36 hours after transfection cells were treated with 0.2 μg/ml nocodazole (Sigma) for 12 hours, then were lysed using a Triton-X100 based buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). Clarified supernatants were used for immunoprecipitation using Dynabeads (Life Technologies) according to the supplier’s instructions. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western analysis using standard protocols. In brief, lysates were separated on gradient SDS-PAGE gels (4–16%, BioRad) and transferred to nitrocellulose or PVDF membranes. After blocking with 5% milk, the membranes were incubated first with rabbit anti-tag antibodies and then with a secondary HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch Labs). Signals were detected with chemiluminescence reagent (BioRad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Protein Expression in Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human monocyte‐derived macrophages were washed 2× with 1× PBS (Fisher) and stored in −80°C until further analysis. Frozen cell lysates were washed, and lysis buffer comprised of RIPA buffer with protease inhibitor; PMSF (Sigma) was added to the wells to obtain cell lysates. After which, cell lysates were equalized for loading into a gradient SDS–PAGE gels (Bio‐Rad) using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce). Proteins were separated by Tris–Hcl gel electrophoresis (Bio‐Rad) and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Bio‐Rad). Later, membranes were blocked overnight with blocking buffer (5% milk in 1× PBS‐T with 0.1% Tween‐20). For primary incubation, antibodies against IL‐1β and β‐actin (Appendix Table S1) were incubated for an hour, followed by another 1‐h incubation with HRP‐coupled secondary antibody 1:2,000 (Cell Signaling). Membranes were developed using Amersham® ECL Western Blotting Detection Reagents (GE Healthcare) following manufacturer's instructions. Quantification of protein band density was performed using ImageJ (NIH) and normalized to β‐actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Western Blotting of Mouse Corneas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was performed as described before.22 (link) Briefly, protein extracts of mouse corneas were prepared in a radioimmunoprecipitation (RIPA) buffer supplemented with 1% SDS and Halt protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Four corneas were pooled and considered one biological replica. Protein concentration was determined by Bradford-based protein assay (Bio-Rad protein assay). Equal amounts of lysates (30 μg protein) were subjected to electrophoresis in 4% to 15% gradient SDS-PAGE gels (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Protein blots of the gels were blocked with Odyssey blocking buffer (OBB; Li-Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) and incubated overnight with primary antibodies: rabbit anti-α-SMA (ab5694, 1:2000 dilution in OBB; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), goat anti-connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) (clone L-20, 1:500 dilution in OBB; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), and mouse anti-β-actin (clone AC-15, 1:10,000 dilution in OBB; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The secondary antibody used was anti-rabbit IgG IRDye 800CW, anti-goat IRDye 800CW, and anti-mouse IgG IRDye 680LT (1:10,0000 dilution in OBB; Li-Cor Biosciences). Blots were then scanned with the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System, and relative band intensity was quantified by Image Studio v2.0 software (Li-Cor Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Protein Immunoblotting Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell monolayers were lysed in Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (MPER™, Thermo Scientific) supplemented with Halt™ Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (Thermo Scientific) and Complete™ Mini Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Indiannapolis, IN). Protein concentrations of cell lysates were determined using the BCA Protein Assay (Thermo Scientific) and proteins were resolved using 7.5%, 12%, or 4-20% gradient SDS-PAGE gels (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Proteins were transferred to supported nitrocellulose membrane overnight at 25 V, and membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat dry milk or 5% BSA in TBST, incubated overnight at 4 C with primary antibody in block, followed by Immun-Star HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Bio-Rad) at 1:10,000; signal was detected with SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Scientific). Antibodies directed against the following were used: p-DNA-PKcsT2609 (Thermo Scientific), DNA-PKcs (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX); AURKA, BRCA1, PARP (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA); BRCA2 (R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), pADPr or PAR (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), pH2AXS139 (Calbiochem), and β-Actin (Sigma-Aldrich). Pixel densities of blot images were calculated using Image-J software (NIH). Changes in protein levels were normalized to loading controls and expressed as fold change relative to treatment controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Expression Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein lysates were prepared by cold lysis of 5 × 106 cells in 1× RIPA buffer for 15 min and centrifugation at 12,000 × g and 4 °C for 10 min. Total protein concentration was measured by BCA assay (Pierce), and equal amounts of protein were denatured in 1× LDS buffer with 1× reducing agent (Life Technologies) at 70 °C for 10 min. Samples were separated on 4–15% gradient SDS-PAGE gels (Biorad), blotted onto PVDF membrane, blocked with 3% dry milk in 1× PBS/0.1% Tween 20 (Sigma–Aldrich) and incubated with mouse anti-beta-Actin IgG (1:20,000, Sigma) or rabbit anti-Dicer IgG (1:1000, Sigma–Aldrich) at 4 °C over night. Detection was performed with the IR-Dye system on an Odyssey scanner (Licor) after incubation with anti-mouse (1:10,000) or anti-rabbit (1:5000) secondary antibodies for 60 min at room temperature. Western blot images were analyzed with ImageJ software (Abramoff et al., 2004 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phospho-MLC Protein Detection Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were separated by gradient SDS-PAGE gels (Biorad) followed by western blotting with 1 hour of blocking (5% BSA in 0.1% Tween in TBS) at room temperature (RT), overnight primary antibody incubation at 4 °C, and three washes of 10 minutes each at RT. Blots were then incubated with secondary antibody for 1 hour at RT and final three washes of 10 minutes each at RT. Immunoblots were developed using Pierce Pico ECL (Thermo Scientific). Antibodies used were polyclonal phospho-MLC of Thr18/Ser19 (CST), polyclonal MLC (CST) and monoclonal α-tubulin (Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Analysis of Cell Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell extracts and western blotting was carried out using standard methods. Briefly, total Cell extracts were prepared in 2x Laemmli sample buffer (4% SDS, 20% Glycerol, 120 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 1x beta-mercaptoethanol, 0.002% bromophenol blue). 30–40 μg of extract was loaded into gradient SDS-PAGE gels (Bio-Rad) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham Proton 0.2 μM NC #10600006) blocked in 3–5% skimmed milk TBST and probed with the antibodies listed in Supplementary Data 5. Membranes were developed using either ECL or ECL Prime (Amersham RPN2106/RPN2232) and exposed to Hyblot-ES Autoradiography Film (Denville, #1156p38). Independent Nbs1f/fISG15−/− clones were used for each repeat.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!