The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sound attenuated chamber

Manufactured by Med Associates
Sourced in United States

Sound-attenuated chambers are designed to provide a quiet, controlled environment. These chambers reduce external noise and vibrations, allowing for precise measurements and experimentation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using sound attenuated chamber

1

Appetitive Conditioning in Calorie-Restricted Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Conditioning was performed in sound-attenuated chambers (Med Associates, Georgia, VT, USA). To test simple reward learning and motivation, we used an established appetitive simple instrumental conditioning task (Gore and Zweifel, 2013 (link); Locke et al., 2018 (link)). Calorie restricted (to 85% of body weight) mice were monitored for learning in a fixed-ratio 1 (FR1) reward for one lever press results in the delivery of a food pellet. Four days of instrumental conditioning were performed in male mice. The session continued until 50 trials were completed or 2 h had elapsed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Open-field test for motor activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate motor activity, several doses of J4 was i.p. injected (n = 4–5 per group) 30 min prior to mice being tested using the open-field test (OFT). The OFT was performed in sound attenuated chambers (Med-Associates, Inc., St. Albans City, VT) equipped with infrared beams and Activity Monitor (Med-Associates). Mice were placed in the center of a Plexiglass box (27 cm × 27 cm × 20.3 cm) and permitted to freely explore the chamber for 30 min (Jia et al. 2020b ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chronic Stereotrode Recording in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were prepared for chronic stereotrode recording as described previously23 (link), either 1 week after implantation surgery (C57BL/6J) or 4 weeks after AAV transduction (Pvalb-IRES-CRE). Mice in their home cage were placed into sound-attenuated chambers (Med Associates) for recording of CA1 activity during natural sleep/wake states and CFC (see below). Stereotrode bundles were slowly advanced into CA1 in 10–20 μm steps over a period of 3–7 days, until stable recordings were obtained. During this period, mice were habituated to daily handling and the recording apparatus (including tethering via lightweight recording cables (Plexon, Inc.)). All experiments began with a 24-h baseline recording period, starting at lights-on, and continued throughout subsequent, single-trial CFC, a 24-h post-training CFM consolidation period, and subsequent CFM testing in the conditioning chamber. Neuronal spike and LFP signals were acquired by differentially filtering data from each electrode wire (bandpass 300 Hz–8 KHz and 0.5–300 Hz, respectively); these data were digitized and amplified using Plexon Omniplex hardware and software as described previously23 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Pre-pulse Inhibition Measurement in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pre-pulse inhibition (PPI) was performed in sound-attenuated chambers (Med Associates Inc., St. Albans, VT, USA) as previously described (16 (link)) with minor revision. In brief, a 65-dB background whiter noise was maintained throughout the test sessions. Mice were acclimated to the testing chamber for 5 min as the first test session. Then, mice were individually placed in a tube fixed on a plastic frame to monitor movement. After 12 initial startle pulses (20 ms, 120 dB) were presented, 12 prepulse/startle trials (prepulse, 20-ms white noise at 70, 80, or 90 dB at 100-ms intervals; 80-ms interval; startle pulse, 20 ms,120 dB) were performed immediately. The initial startle pulses provided a baseline of startle reactivity for the following test session. The different trial types (12 times for each trial type) were presented pseudo-randomly with a 15-s inter-trial interval (10-20 s), and two consecutive trials were always different. Mice movements were analyzed for 100 ms from startle stimulus onset. Each complete test session lasted about 25 min. For each pre-pulse intensity, PPI (%) was calculated as: [1 - (startle amplitude on “pre-pulse followed by pulse” trial/startle amplitude on “pulse-alone” trial)] × 100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Measuring Locomotor Activity in Rodents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Locomotor activity was tested for 30 min under ambient light levels (190–210 lux) in sound attenuated chambers (43 × 43 cm) equipped with an infrared beam detection system (Med Associates Inc.). Data are presented as cumulative distance traveled in 5 min intervals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Auditory Electrophysiology in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were first habituated to the sound-attenuated chambers for several days (Med Associates Inc.). Auditory stimulation was performed using an audio generator, and electrical signals were recorded with a Neurologger and analyzed offline. Within a recording session, the ERP protocol (300 repetitions of white noise click pairs, spaced 8 s apart) or ASSR protocol (300 repetitions of 2-s-long click trains consisting of 80 white noise clicks, spaced 10 s apart, at 85 dB) were presented. All mice received all treatments in a randomized cross-over design.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Auditory Fear Conditioning in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used the (Quirk et al., 2000 (link)) method for auditory fear conditioning. Rats were placed into sound attenuated chambers (Med Associates Fairfax VT) with a 33×28×25 cm interior chamber within a 63×45×58 cm sound attenuating outer box and aluminum walls and aluminum rod floor. The fear conditioning paradigm was controlled by Ethovision software (Noldus Information Technology) and consisted of 3 days. On day one, (acquisition) rats were allowed to habituate to the chamber for 5 min followed by 5 x 30 s tones paired with shock, 0.5mA for 0.5 s, administered with 3 min inter-trial intervals (ITI). Rats were removed to their homecage and returned to the chamber 24 hr later. For day two (extinction), after another 5 min habituation, 20 x 30 s tones, with 3 min ITIs, were played with no shock at termination. Rats were again returned to the homecage for 24 hr. The last day, day three (extinction recall), consisted again of a 5 min habituation and 20 x 30 s tones, with 3 min ITIs. Freezing, the complete cessation of all movement other than respiration was measured by Freezescan software (CleverSys, Inc) during the 30 s tones.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Assessing Murine Locomotor Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess locomotor activity, mice were placed in sound-attenuated chambers equipped with photo beams (Med Associates, St. Albans, VT, USA). Mice were habituated for 30 min and then observed for an additional 90 min. Number of ambulations, measured by the number of beam breaks, was quantified in 5-min intervals after the habituation period.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Open Field Locomotor Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immediately after finishing the elevated plus maze, the mouse was transferred to a clear acrylic open field arena (42cm by 42cm floor dimensions, with 4 walls that were each 30.5cm high, and no ceiling) for 15 minutes. The acrylic open field arena was located inside a sound-attenuated chamber (Med Associates; Fairfax, VT) with lights on (40 lux inside the chamber). Locomotion was monitored using infrared beam breaks (Versamax, AccuScan Instruments; Columbus, OH). Total distance covered and percent of time spent in the center (defined as >7.875cm from the edges of the chamber, i.e. 3 grid squares in Versamax analysis software) were analyzed. The chamber was cleaned with 70% ethanol and allowed to dry between mice. Mice were returned to the home cage immediately after the open field test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Open Field Exploration in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were placed in the center of a transparent acrylic arena with 42 cm by 42 cm floor dimensions, 30.5 cm high walls, and a removable, perforated lid (Figure 1A). The arena was housed within a sound-attenuated chamber (Med Associates; Fairfax, VT) with lights and a fan in the interior. Mice were allowed to explore the arena undisturbed for 15 min. Movement was monitored in the arena using infrared beam brakes (Versamax, AccuScan Instruments; Columbus, OH). Behavioral metrics analyzed included total distance traveled (cm) and time in center (center defined as > 7.875 cm from the walls of the arena). The arena was wiped down with 70% ethanol and allowed to dry before adding each animal. Mice were only tested once.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!