The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cd8 clone c8 144b

Manufactured by Nichirei Biosciences
Sourced in United States, Germany, Denmark

CD8 (clone C8/144B) is a monoclonal antibody that recognizes the CD8 antigen. CD8 is a glycoprotein that is expressed on the surface of cytotoxic T cells, a type of lymphocyte. The CD8 (clone C8/144B) antibody can be used to identify and study CD8+ T cells in various research applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using cd8 clone c8 144b

1

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Tumor Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical (IHC) procedures were conducted as described previously [15 (link)]. Antibodies used are PD-L1 (SP142, rabbit monoclonal, Spring Bioscience, Pleasanton, CA, USA), PD-1 (NAT105, mouse monoclonal, GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA), CD4 (clone SP35, rabbit monoclonal, Spring Bioscience, Pleasanton, CA, USA), CD8 (clone C8/144B, mouse monoclonal, Nichirei Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan), CD68 (PG-M1, mouse monoclonal, DAKO, Tokyo, Japan), and VEGF (A-20, rabbit polyclonal, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA). For PD-L1 staining, antigen retrieval was done by autoclaving at 121 °C for 10 min in Tris/EDTA buffer (pH 9.0), and 1st antibody incubation (1:100) was conducted at 4 °C overnight. The corresponding normal endometria or stroma provided an internal positive control, and negative controls without addition of primary antibody showed low background staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Immune Markers in Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue samples from EC lesions or RLN were routinely fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. All 3‐μm serial sections were stored in a deep freezer until immunostaining was performed. Antigen retrieval was performed as follows: sections were immersed in 1‐mM ethylenediamine tetra‐acetic acid solution (pH 8.0), and samples were heated in a microwave (95°C, 5 min) for CD169 staining (clone HSn 7D2; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) or using a pressure cooker for staining CD68 (clone PG‐M1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), CD57 (clone NK‐1; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and CD8 (clone C8/144B; Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan). An isotype‐matched mouse IgG (Dako) antibody was used as a negative control. Following incubation with primary antibodies, samples were incubated with an HRP‐labeled goat anti‐mouse antibody (Nichirei). Immune reactivity was visualized using a diaminobenzidine substrate system (Nichirei). Double immunostaining of CD169 and CD57 in RLN was performed as described previously.23 Briefly, sections were incubated with an anti‐CD57 antibody, staining was visualized using DAB, and then slides were washed with citrate buffer (pH 2.2). Sections were then incubated with anti‐CD169 antibodies and visualized using HistoGreen (Linaris, Dossenheim, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Tumor Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining was performed on 3 μm-thick sections obtained from paraffin-embedded tissues. Mouse monoclonal antibodies against CD68 (clone PG-M1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), CD8 (clone C8/144B; Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) and CD169 (clone HSn7D2; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA) were used. After the samples were reacted with primary antibodies, they were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary anti-mouse antibody (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan). Signals were visualized using the diaminobenzidine system (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan). Normal mouse immunoglobulin (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) was used as a negative control and no signal was observed in those control sections. Data regarding the Ki-67 labeling index, as well as the statuses of ER, PgR, and Her2, were previously evaluated by our research group [19 (link), 20 (link)]. CD68-, CD169-, and CD8-positive staining was counted in four randomly selected fields-of-view by two pathologists (TS and YM) who were blind to patient information. The average numbers of counted cells were determined and were used to calculate the number per mm2. To evaluate lymph node metastasis, sinus macrophages were counted in non-metastatic regions. The detailed methods of cell counting in RLNs have been previously described [21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!