The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using rabbit anti glua1

1

Neuronal Synaptic Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary antibodies included: mouse anti-GluA1 (NeuroMAB; 1:10 IHC), rabbit anti-GluA1 (Cell Signaling Technologies; 13185, 1:1,000), mouse anti-GluA2 (NeuroMAB; 1:10 IHC), mouse anti-GluA2 (MAB1189; 1:500), chicken anti-Homer (SySy; 160006, 1:500), mouse anti-SynGAP (Thermo Fisher Scientific; PA1-046, 1:500 IHC, 1:5,000 WB), mouse anti-PSD95 (Thermo Fisher; MA1-045, 1:1,000 WB), rabbit anti-Synaptophysin (PA1-1043, 1:5,000 WB), mouse anti-Cdk5 (Invitrogen; AHZ0492, 1:500), mouse anti-WAVE1 (mAb K91/361; NeuroMab), goat anti-PPA2c (Santa Cruz; sc-6110), rabbit anti-CaMKIIα (Abcam; EP1829Y, 1:1,000), rabbit-anti-p-Synapsin1-Ser 551 (Abcam; Ab32532), rabbit anti-p35 (Cell Signaling; 2680, 1:250), mouse anti-GAPDH (Millipore; MAB374, 1:4,000), and Phalloidin Alexa 647 (Thermo Fisher Scientific; A22287, 1:200). Secondary antibodies included: donkey anti-mouse Alexa 488 (Thermo Fisher Scientific; R37114, 1:200), donkey anti-mouse Dy 488 (Abcam; 96875, 1:500), donkey anti-chicken Alexa 488 (Jackson ImmunoResearch; 703-545-155), and LI-COR (anti-mouse, anti-goat, and anti-rabbit IRDye 680 and 800; 1:10,000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

FASS-LTP Assay for Synaptic Plasticity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Activity-dependent responses in hippocampal synaptosomes were analyzed by FASS-LTP, as previously described26 (link),27 (link). FASS-LTP consists of chemical LTP (cLTP) stimulation directly in crude P2 synaptosomal fractions, immunofluorescence labeling for surface GluA1 and neurexin-1β, and flow cytometry analysis. Briefly, fresh crude synaptosome P2 fractions were obtained from the hippocampi of mice injected with AAVs and stimulated with glycine (500 μM) and KCl (50 mM). For surface immunolabeling, primary antibodies were rabbit anti-GluA1 (Cell Signaling #13185; 1:400) and mouse anti-Nrx1β (UC Davis/NIH NeuroMab Facility, 75–216; 2.5 μg/ml). Secondary antibodies were anti-rabbit-Alexa-405, anti-rabbit-Alexa-488 and anti-mouse-Alexa-647 antibodies (Life Sciences), at 2.5 μl/ml. Samples were protected from light, maintained at 4 °C and immediately run on a flow cytometer (Novocyte, ACEA Biosciences, Inc); 20,000 events were collected and analyzed for each sample with an event rate of approximately 500/sec. Analysis was performed using the FlowJo v10.3 software (LLC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibody Panel for Neuronal Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primary antibodies used were: mouse anti-tubulin (1:30,000, #T9026, Sigma), rabbit anti-GAPDH (1:5,000, #sc-25778, Santa Cruz), rabbit anti-GluN2A (1:1,000, #M264, Sigma), rabbit anti-GluN2B (1:1,000, #718600, Invitrogen), mouse anti-GluN2D (1:1,000, #MAB5578, Millipore), rabbit anti-GluA1 (1:1,000, #13185, Cell Signaling), mouse anti-GluA2 (1:1,000, #75–002, Neuromab), mouse anti-GluA3 (1:1,000, #MAB5416, Millipore), polyclonal anti-Rph3A (1:2,000, Protein Tech, #11396-1-AP), mouse anti-PSD-95 (1:1,000, #K28/43, Neuromab), rabbit anti-tyrosine hydroxylase (1:10,000, #AB152, Millipore), rabbit anti-phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 44/42 (1:1,000, Cell Signaling, #9101), rabbit anti-ERK 44/42 (1:1,000, #9102, Cell Signaling), rabbit anti-phospho-cAMP responsive element binding protein (CREB) (1:1,000, #9198, Cell Signaling), and rabbit anti-CREB (1:1,000, #9197, Cell Signaling). The secondary horseradish peroxidase-linked antibodies used were goat anti-rabbit (1:10,000, #172-1019, Biorad) and goat anti-mouse (1:10,000, #172-1011, Biorad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!